1 files changed, 75 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Examples/d/extend/d1/runme.d b/Examples/d/extend/d1/runme.d
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..96501d1a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Examples/d/extend/d1/runme.d
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+/// This file illustrates the cross language polymorphism using directors.
+module runme;
+
+import example;
+import tango.io.Stdout;
+
+// CEO class, which overrides Employee.getPosition().
+class CEO : Manager {
+public:
+  this( char[] name ) {
+    super( name );
+  }
+
+  override char[] getPosition() {
+    return "CEO";
+  }
+
+  // Public method to stop the SWIG proxy base class from thinking it owns the underlying C++ memory.
+  void disownMemory() {
+    swigCMemOwn = false;
+  }
+}
+
+void main() {
+  // Create an instance of CEO, a class derived from the D proxy of the
+  // underlying C++ class. The calls to getName() and getPosition() are standard,
+  // the call to getTitle() uses the director wrappers to call CEO.getPosition().
+
+  auto e = new CEO( "Alice" );
+  Stdout.formatln( "{} is a {}.", e.getName(), e.getPosition() );
+  Stdout.formatln( "Just call her '{}'.", e.getTitle() );
+  Stdout( "----------------------" ).newline;
+
+  {
+    // Create a new EmployeeList instance.  This class does not have a C++
+    // director wrapper, but can be used freely with other classes that do.
+    scope auto list = new EmployeeList();
+
+    // EmployeeList owns its items, so we must surrender ownership of objects we add.
+    e.disownMemory();
+    list.addEmployee(e);
+    Stdout( "----------------------" ).newline;
+
+    // Now we access the first four items in list (three are C++ objects that
+    // EmployeeList's constructor adds, the last is our CEO). The virtual
+    // methods of all these instances are treated the same. For items 0, 1, and
+    // 2, all methods resolve in C++. For item 3, our CEO, getTitle calls
+    // getPosition which resolves in D. The call to getPosition is
+    // slightly different, however, because of the overidden getPosition() call, since
+    // now the object reference has been "laundered" by passing through
+    // EmployeeList as an Employee*. Previously, D resolved the call
+    // immediately in CEO, but now D thinks the object is an instance of
+    // class Employee. So the call passes through the
+    // Employee proxy class and on to the C wrappers and C++ director,
+    // eventually ending up back at the D CEO implementation of getPosition().
+    // The call to getTitle() for item 3 runs the C++ Employee::getTitle()
+    // method, which in turn calls getPosition(). This virtual method call
+    // passes down through the C++ director class to the D implementation
+    // in CEO. All this routing takes place transparently.
+
+    Stdout( "(position, title) for items 0-3:" ).newline;
+    Stdout.formatln( "  {}, '{}'", list.getItem(0).getPosition(), list.getItem(0).getTitle() );
+    Stdout.formatln( "  {}, '{}'", list.getItem(1).getPosition(), list.getItem(1).getTitle() );
+    Stdout.formatln( "  {}, '{}'", list.getItem(2).getPosition(), list.getItem(2).getTitle() );
+    Stdout.formatln( "  {}, '{}'", list.getItem(3).getPosition(), list.getItem(3).getTitle() );
+    Stdout( "----------------------" ).newline;
+
+    // All Employees will be destroyed when the EmployeeList goes out of scope,
+    // including the CEO instance.
+  }
+  Stdout( "----------------------" ).newline;
+
+  // All done.
+  Stdout( "Exiting cleanly from D code." ).newline;
+}