summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/FAQ.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'FAQ.txt')
-rw-r--r--FAQ.txt1049
1 files changed, 1049 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/FAQ.txt b/FAQ.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e8b7692e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/FAQ.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,1049 @@
+.. -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
+
+===========================================
+ Docutils FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)
+===========================================
+
+:Date: $Date$
+:Revision: $Revision$
+:Web site: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/
+:Copyright: This document has been placed in the public domain.
+
+.. contents::
+.. sectnum::
+
+
+This is a work in progress. Please feel free to ask questions and/or
+provide answers; send email to the `Docutils-users`_ mailing list.
+Project members should feel free to edit the source text file
+directly.
+
+.. _let us know:
+.. _Docutils-users: docs/user/mailing-lists.html#docutils-users
+
+
+Docutils
+========
+
+What is Docutils?
+-----------------
+
+Docutils_ is a system for processing plaintext documentation into
+useful formats, such as HTML, XML, and LaTeX. It supports multiple
+types of input, such as standalone files (implemented), inline
+documentation from Python modules and packages (under development),
+`PEPs (Python Enhancement Proposals)`_ (implemented), and others as
+discovered.
+
+For an overview of the Docutils project implementation, see `PEP
+258`_, "Docutils Design Specification".
+
+Docutils is implemented in Python_.
+
+.. _Docutils: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/
+.. _PEPs (Python Enhancement Proposals):
+ http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0012.html
+.. _PEP 258: http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0258.html
+.. _Python: http://www.python.org/
+
+
+Why is it called "Docutils"?
+----------------------------
+
+Docutils is short for "Python Documentation Utilities". The name
+"Docutils" was inspired by "Distutils", the Python Distribution
+Utilities architected by Greg Ward, a component of Python's standard
+library.
+
+The earliest known use of the term "docutils" in a Python context was
+a `fleeting reference`__ in a message by Fred Drake on 1999-12-02 in
+the Python Doc-SIG mailing list. It was suggested `as a project
+name`__ on 2000-11-27 on Doc-SIG, again by Fred Drake, in response to
+a question from Tony "Tibs" Ibbs: "What do we want to *call* this
+thing?". This was shortly after David Goodger first `announced
+reStructuredText`__ on Doc-SIG.
+
+Tibs used the name "Docutils" for `his effort`__ "to document what the
+Python docutils package should support, with a particular emphasis on
+documentation strings". Tibs joined the current project (and its
+predecessors) and graciously donated the name.
+
+For more history of reStructuredText and the Docutils project, see `An
+Introduction to reStructuredText`_.
+
+Please note that the name is "Docutils", not "DocUtils" or "Doc-Utils"
+or any other variation.
+
+.. _An Introduction to reStructuredText:
+ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/introduction.html
+__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/doc-sig/1999-December/000878.html
+__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/doc-sig/2000-November/001252.html
+__ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/doc-sig/2000-November/001239.html
+__ http://homepage.ntlworld.com/tibsnjoan/docutils/STpy.html
+
+
+Is there a GUI authoring environment for Docutils?
+--------------------------------------------------
+
+DocFactory_ is under development. It uses wxPython and looks very
+promising.
+
+.. _DocFactory:
+ http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/gschwant/docfactory/doc/
+
+
+What is the status of the Docutils project?
+-------------------------------------------
+
+Although useful and relatively stable, Docutils is experimental code,
+with APIs and architecture subject to change.
+
+Our highest priority is to fix bugs as they are reported. So the
+latest code from the repository_ (or the snapshots_) is almost always
+the most stable (bug-free) as well as the most featureful.
+
+
+What is the Docutils project release policy?
+--------------------------------------------
+
+It's "release early & often". We also have automatically-generated
+snapshots_ which always contain the latest code from the repository_.
+As the project matures, we may formalize on a
+stable/development-branch scheme, but we're not using anything like
+that yet.
+
+.. _repository: docs/dev/repository.html
+.. _snapshots: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/#download
+
+
+reStructuredText
+================
+
+What is reStructuredText?
+-------------------------
+
+reStructuredText_ is an easy-to-read, what-you-see-is-what-you-get
+plaintext markup syntax and parser system. The reStructuredText
+parser is a component of Docutils_. reStructuredText is a revision
+and reinterpretation of the StructuredText_ and Setext_ lightweight
+markup systems.
+
+If you are reading this on the web, you can see for yourself. `The
+source for this FAQ <FAQ.txt>`_ is written in reStructuredText; open
+it in another window and compare them side by side.
+
+`A ReStructuredText Primer`_ and the `Quick reStructuredText`_ user
+reference are a good place to start. The `reStructuredText Markup
+Specification`_ is a detailed technical specification.
+
+.. _A ReStructuredText Primer:
+ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/quickstart.html
+.. _Quick reStructuredText:
+ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/quickref.html
+.. _reStructuredText Markup Specification:
+ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html
+.. _reStructuredText: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html
+.. _StructuredText:
+ http://dev.zope.org/Members/jim/StructuredTextWiki/FrontPage/
+.. _Setext: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/mirror/setext.html
+
+
+Why is it called "reStructuredText"?
+------------------------------------
+
+The name came from a combination of "StructuredText", one of
+reStructuredText's predecessors, with "re": "revised", "reworked", and
+"reinterpreted", and as in the ``re.py`` regular expression module.
+For a detailed history of reStructuredText and the Docutils project,
+see `An Introduction to reStructuredText`_.
+
+
+What's the standard abbreviation for "reStructuredText"?
+--------------------------------------------------------
+
+"RST" and "ReST" (or "reST") are both acceptable. Care should be
+taken with capitalization, to avoid confusion with "REST__", an
+acronym for "Representational State Transfer".
+
+The abbreviations "reSTX" and "rSTX"/"rstx" should **not** be used;
+they overemphasize reStructuredText's precedessor, Zope's
+StructuredText.
+
+__ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representational_State_Transfer
+
+
+What's the standard filename extension for a reStructuredText file?
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+It's ".txt". Some people would like to use ".rest" or ".rst" or
+".restx", but why bother? ReStructuredText source files are meant to
+be readable as plaintext, and most operating systems already associate
+".txt" with text files. Using a specialized filename extension would
+require that users alter their OS settings, which is something that
+many users will not be willing or able to do.
+
+
+Are there any reStructuredText editor extensions?
+-------------------------------------------------
+
+See `Editor Support for reStructuredText`__.
+
+__ http://docutils.sf.net/tools/editors/README.html
+
+
+How can I indicate the document title? Subtitle?
+-------------------------------------------------
+
+A uniquely-adorned section title at the beginning of a document is
+treated specially, as the document title. Similarly, a
+uniquely-adorned section title immediately after the document title
+becomes the document subtitle. For example::
+
+ This is the Document Title
+ ==========================
+
+ This is the Document Subtitle
+ -----------------------------
+
+ Here's an ordinary paragraph.
+
+Counterexample::
+
+ Here's an ordinary paragraph.
+
+ This is *not* a Document Title
+ ==============================
+
+ The "ordinary paragraph" above the section title
+ prevents it from becoming the document title.
+
+Another counterexample::
+
+ This is not the Document Title, because...
+ ===========================================
+
+ Here's an ordinary paragraph.
+
+ ... the title adornment is not unique
+ =====================================
+
+ Another ordinary paragraph.
+
+
+How can I represent esoteric characters (e.g. character entities) in a document?
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+For example, say you want an em-dash (XML character entity &mdash;,
+Unicode character U+2014) in your document: use a real em-dash.
+Insert concrete characters (e.g. type a *real* em-dash) into your
+input file, using whatever encoding suits your application, and tell
+Docutils the input encoding. Docutils uses Unicode internally, so the
+em-dash character is a real em-dash internally.
+
+Emacs users should refer to the `Emacs Support for reStructuredText`__
+document. Tips for other editors are welcome.
+
+__ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/tools/editors/emacs/README.html
+
+ReStructuredText has no character entity subsystem; it doesn't know
+anything about XML charents. To Docutils, "&mdash;" in input text is
+7 discrete characters; no interpretation happens. When writing HTML,
+the "&" is converted to "&amp;", so in the raw output you'd see
+"&amp;mdash;". There's no difference in interpretation for text
+inside or outside inline literals or literal blocks -- there's no
+character entity interpretation in either case.
+
+If you can't use a Unicode-compatible encoding and must rely on 7-bit
+ASCII, there is a workaround. New in Docutils 0.3.10 is a set of
+`Standard Substitution Definition Sets`_, which provide equivalents of
+XML & HTML character entity sets as substitution definitions. For
+example, the Japanese yen currency symbol can be used as follows::
+
+ .. include:: <xhtml1-lat1.txt>
+
+ |yen| 600 for a complete meal? That's cheap!
+
+For earlier versions of Docutils, equivalent files containing
+character entity set substitution definitions using the "unicode_"
+directive `are available`_. Please read the `description and
+instructions`_ for use. Thanks to David Priest for the original idea.
+
+If you insist on using XML-style charents, you'll have to implement a
+pre-processing system to convert to UTF-8 or something. That
+introduces complications though; you can no longer *write* about
+charents naturally; instead of writing "&mdash;" you'd have to write
+"&amp;mdash;".
+
+For the common case of long dashes, you might also want to insert the
+following substitution definitons into your document (both of them are
+using the "unicode_" directive)::
+
+ .. |--| unicode:: U+2013 .. en dash
+ .. |---| unicode:: U+2014 .. em dash, trimming surrounding whitespace
+ :trim:
+
+.. |--| unicode:: U+2013 .. en dash
+.. |---| unicode:: U+2014 .. em dash, trimming surrounding whitespace
+ :trim:
+
+Now you can write dashes using pure ASCII: "``foo |--| bar; foo |---|
+bar``", rendered as "foo |--| bar; foo |---| bar". (Note that Mozilla
+and Firefox may render this incorrectly.) The ``:trim:`` option for
+the em dash is necessary because you cannot write "``foo|---|bar``";
+thus you need to add spaces ("``foo |---| bar``") and advise the
+reStructuredText parser to trim the spaces.
+
+.. _Standard Substitution Definition Sets:
+ http://docutils.sf.net/docs/ref/rst/substitutions.html
+.. _unicode:
+ http://docutils.sf.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#unicode-character-codes
+.. _are available: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/tmp/charents/
+.. _tarball: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/tmp/charents.tgz
+.. _description and instructions:
+ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/tmp/charents/README.html
+.. _to-do list: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/dev/todo.html
+
+
+How can I generate backticks using a Scandinavian keyboard?
+-----------------------------------------------------------
+
+The use of backticks in reStructuredText is a bit awkward with
+Scandinavian keyboards, where the backtick is a "dead" key. To get
+one ` character one must press SHIFT-` + SPACE.
+
+Unfortunately, with all the variations out there, there's no way to
+please everyone. For Scandinavian programmers and technical writers,
+this is not limited to reStructuredText but affects many languages and
+environments.
+
+Possible solutions include
+
+* If you have to input a lot of backticks, simply type one in the
+ normal/awkward way, select it, copy and then paste the rest (CTRL-V
+ is a lot faster than SHIFT-` + SPACE).
+
+* Use keyboard macros.
+
+* Remap the keyboard. The Scandinavian keyboard layout is awkward for
+ other programming/technical characters too; for example, []{}
+ etc. are a bit awkward compared to US keyboards.
+
+ According to Axel Kollmorgen,
+
+ Under Windows, you can use the `Microsoft Keyboard Layout Creator
+ <http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/tools/msklc.mspx>`__ to easily
+ map the backtick key to a real backtick (no dead key). took me
+ five minutes to load my default (german) keyboard layout, untick
+ "Dead Key?" from the backtick key properties ("in all shift
+ states"), "build dll and setup package", install the generated
+ .msi, and add my custom keyboard layout via Control Panel >
+ Regional and Language Options > Languages > Details > Add
+ Keyboard layout (and setting it as default "when you start your
+ computer").
+
+* Use a virtual/screen keyboard or character palette, such as:
+
+ - `Web-based keyboards <http://keyboard.lab.co.il/>`__ (IE only
+ unfortunately).
+ - Windows: `Click-N-Type <http://www.lakefolks.org/cnt/>`__.
+ - Mac OS X: the Character Palette can store a set of favorite
+ characters for easy input. Open System Preferences,
+ International, Input Menu tab, enable "Show input menu in menu
+ bar", and be sure that Character Palette is enabled in the list.
+
+If anyone knows of other/better solutions, please `let us know`_.
+
+
+Are there any tools for HTML/XML-to-reStructuredText? (Round-tripping)
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+People have tossed the idea around, and some implementations of
+reStructuredText-generating tools can be found in the `Docutils Link
+List`_.
+
+There's no reason why reStructuredText should not be round-trippable
+to/from XML; any technicalities which prevent round-tripping would be
+considered bugs. Whitespace would not be identical, but paragraphs
+shouldn't suffer. The tricky parts would be the smaller details, like
+links and IDs and other bookkeeping.
+
+For HTML, true round-tripping may not be possible. Even adding lots
+of extra "class" attributes may not be enough. A "simple HTML" to RST
+filter is possible -- for some definition of "simple HTML" -- but HTML
+is used as dumb formatting so much that such a filter may not be
+particularly useful. An 80/20 approach should work though: build a
+tool that does 80% of the work automatically, leaving the other 20%
+for manual tweaks.
+
+.. _Docutils Link List: docs/user/links.html
+
+
+Are there any Wikis that use reStructuredText syntax?
+-----------------------------------------------------
+
+There are several, with various degrees of completeness. With no
+implied endorsement or recommendation, and in no particular order:
+
+* `Webware for Python wiki
+ <http://wiki.webwareforpython.org/thiswiki.html>`__
+* `Ian Bicking's experimental code
+ <http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/ianb/wiki/Wiki.py>`__
+* `MoinMoin <http://moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/>`__ has some support;
+ `here's a sample <http://moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/RestSample>`__
+* Zope-based `Zwiki <http://zwiki.org/>`__
+* Zope3-based Zwiki (in the Zope 3 source tree as ``zope.products.zwiki``)
+* `StikiWiki <http://mithrandr.moria.org/code/stikiwiki/>`__
+* `Trac <http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/>`__ `supports using reStructuredText
+ <http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/wiki/WikiRestructuredText>`__ as an
+ alternative to wiki markup. This includes support for `TracLinks
+ <http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/wiki/TracLinks>`__ from within RST
+ text via a custom RST reference-directive or, even easier, an interpreted text
+ role 'trac'
+* `Vogontia <http://www.ososo.de/vogontia/>`__, a Wiki-like FAQ system
+
+Please `let us know`_ of any other reStructuredText Wikis.
+
+The example application for the `Web Framework Shootout
+<http://colorstudy.com/docs/shootout.html>`__ article is a Wiki using
+reStructuredText.
+
+
+Are there any Weblog (Blog) projects that use reStructuredText syntax?
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+With no implied endorsement or recommendation, and in no particular
+order:
+
+* `Firedrop <http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/firedrop2/>`__
+* `Python Desktop Server <http://pyds.muensterland.org/>`__
+* `PyBloxsom <http://roughingit.subtlehints.net/pyblosxom/>`__
+* `Lino WebMan <http://lino.sourceforge.net/webman.html>`__
+
+Please `let us know`_ of any other reStructuredText Blogs.
+
+
+Can lists be indented without generating block quotes?
+------------------------------------------------------
+
+Some people like to write lists with indentation, without intending a
+block quote context, like this::
+
+ paragraph
+
+ * list item 1
+ * list item 2
+
+There has been a lot of discussion about this, but there are some
+issues that would need to be resolved before it could be implemented.
+There is a summary of the issues and pointers to the discussions in
+`the to-do list`__.
+
+__ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/dev/todo.html#indented-lists
+
+
+Could the requirement for blank lines around lists be relaxed?
+--------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Short answer: no.
+
+In reStructuredText, it would be impossible to unambigously mark up
+and parse lists without blank lines before and after. Deeply nested
+lists may look ugly with so many blank lines, but it's a price we pay
+for unambiguous markup. Some other plaintext markup systems do not
+require blank lines in nested lists, but they have to compromise
+somehow, either accepting ambiguity or requiring extra complexity.
+For example, `Epytext <http://epydoc.sf.net/epytext.html#list>`__ does
+not require blank lines around lists, but it does require that lists
+be indented and that ambiguous cases be escaped.
+
+
+How can I include mathematical equations in documents?
+------------------------------------------------------
+
+There is no elegant built-in way, yet. There are several ideas, but
+no obvious winner. This issue requires a champion to solve the
+technical and aesthetic issues and implement a generic solution.
+Here's the `to-do list entry`__.
+
+__ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/dev/todo.html#math-markup
+
+There are several quick & dirty ways to include equations in documents.
+They all presently use LaTeX syntax or dialects of it.
+
+* For LaTeX output, nothing beats raw LaTeX math. A simple way is to
+ use the `raw directive`_::
+
+ .. raw:: latex
+
+ \[ x^3 + 3x^2a + 3xa^2 + a^3, \]
+
+ For inline math you could use substitutions of the raw directive but
+ the recently added `raw role`_ is more convenient. You must define a
+ custom role based on it once in your document::
+
+ .. role:: raw-latex(raw)
+ :format: latex
+
+ and then you can just use the new role in your text::
+
+ the binomial expansion of :raw-latex:`$(x+a)^3$` is
+
+ .. _raw directive: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/
+ directives.html#raw-data-pass-through
+ .. _raw role: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/roles.html#raw
+
+* Jens Jørgen Mortensen has implemented a "latex-math" role and
+ directive, available from `his sandbox`__.
+
+ __ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/sandbox/jensj/latex_math/
+
+* For HTML the "Right" w3c-standard way to include math is MathML_.
+ Unfortunately its rendering is still quite broken (or absent) on many
+ browsers but it's getting better. Another bad problem is that typing
+ or reading raw MathML by humans is *really* painful, so embedding it
+ in a reST document with the raw directive would defy the goals of
+ readability and editability of reST (see an `example of raw MathML
+ <http://sf.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=2177102>`__).
+
+ A much less painful way to generate HTML+MathML is to use itex2mml_ to
+ convert a dialect of LaTeX syntax to presentation MathML. Here is an
+ example of potential `itex math markup
+ <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.text.docutils.user/118>`__. The
+ simplest way to use it is to add ``html`` to the format lists for the
+ raw directive/role and postprocess the resulting document with
+ itex2mml. This way you can *generate LaTeX and HTML+MathML from the
+ same source*, but you must limit yourself to the intersection of LaTeX
+ and itex markups for this to work. Alan G. Isaac wrote a detailed
+ HOWTO_ for this approach.
+
+ .. _MathML: http://www.w3.org/Math/
+ .. _itex2mml: http://pear.math.pitt.edu/mathzilla/itex2mml.html
+ .. _HOWTO: http://www.american.edu/econ/itex2mml/mathhack.rst
+
+* The other way to add math to HTML is to use images of the equations,
+ typically generated by TeX. This is inferior to MathML in the long
+ term but is perhaps more accessible nowdays.
+
+ Of course, doing it by hand is too much work. Beni Cherniavsky has
+ written some `preprocessing scripts`__ for converting the
+ ``texmath`` role/directive into images for HTML output and raw
+ directives/subsitution for LaTeX output. This way you can *generate
+ LaTeX and HTML+images from the same source*. `Instructions here`__.
+
+ __ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/sandbox/cben/rolehack/
+ __ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/sandbox/cben/rolehack/README.html
+
+
+Is nested inline markup possible?
+---------------------------------
+
+Not currently, no. It's on the `to-do list`__ (`details here`__), and
+hopefully will be part of the reStructuredText parser soon. At that
+time, markup like this will become possible::
+
+ Here is some *emphasized text containing a `hyperlink`_ and
+ ``inline literals``*.
+
+__ http://docutils.sf.net/docs/dev/todo.html#nested-inline-markup
+__ http://docutils.sf.net/docs/dev/rst/alternatives.html#nested-inline-markup
+
+There are workarounds, but they are either convoluted or ugly or both.
+They are not recommended.
+
+* Inline markup can be combined with hyperlinks using `substitution
+ definitions`__ and references__ with the `"replace" directive`__.
+ For example::
+
+ Here is an |emphasized hyperlink|_.
+
+ .. |emphasized hyperlink| replace:: *emphasized hyperlink*
+ .. _emphasized hyperlink: http://example.org
+
+ It is not possible for just a portion of the replacement text to be
+ a hyperlink; it's the entire replacement text or nothing.
+
+ __ http://docutils.sf.net/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#substitution-definitions
+ __ http://docutils.sf.net/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#substitution-references
+ __ http://docutils.sf.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#replace
+
+* The `"raw" directive`__ can be used to insert raw HTML into HTML
+ output::
+
+ Here is some |stuff|.
+
+ .. |stuff| raw:: html
+
+ <em>emphasized text containing a
+ <a href="http://example.org">hyperlink</a> and
+ <tt>inline literals</tt></em>
+
+ Raw LaTeX is supported for LaTeX output, etc.
+
+ __ http://docutils.sf.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#raw
+
+
+How to indicate a line break or a significant newline?
+------------------------------------------------------
+
+`Line blocks`__ are designed for address blocks, verse, and other
+cases where line breaks are significant and must be preserved. Unlike
+literal blocks, the typeface is not changed, and inline markup is
+recognized. For example::
+
+ | A one, two, a one two three four
+ |
+ | Half a bee, philosophically,
+ | must, *ipso facto*, half not be.
+ | But half the bee has got to be,
+ | *vis a vis* its entity. D'you see?
+ |
+ | But can a bee be said to be
+ | or not to be an entire bee,
+ | when half the bee is not a bee,
+ | due to some ancient injury?
+ |
+ | Singing...
+
+__ http://docutils.sf.net/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#line-blocks
+
+Here's a workaround for manually inserting explicit line breaks in
+HTML output::
+
+ .. |br| raw:: html
+
+ <br />
+
+ I want to break this line here: |br| this is after the break.
+
+ If the extra whitespace bothers you, |br|\ backslash-escape it.
+
+
+A URL containing asterisks doesn't work. What to do?
+-----------------------------------------------------
+
+Asterisks are valid URL characters (see :RFC:`2396`), sometimes used
+in URLs. For example::
+
+ http://cvs.example.org/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/module/file
+
+Unfortunately, the parser thinks the asterisks are indicating
+emphasis. The slashes serve as delineating punctuation, allowing the
+asterisks to be recognized as markup. The example above is separated
+by the parser into a truncated URL, an emphasized word, and some
+regular text::
+
+ http://cvs.example.org/viewcvs.py/
+ *checkout*
+ /module/file
+
+To turn off markup recognition, use a backslash to escape at least the
+first asterisk, like this::
+
+ http://cvs.example.org/viewcvs.py/\*checkout*/module/file
+
+Escaping the second asterisk doesn't hurt, but it isn't necessary.
+
+
+How can I make a literal block with *some* formatting?
+------------------------------------------------------
+
+Use the `parsed-literal`_ directive.
+
+.. _parsed-literal: docs/ref/rst/directives.html#parsed-literal
+
+Scenario: a document contains some source code, which calls for a
+literal block to preserve linebreaks and whitespace. But part of the
+source code should be formatted, for example as emphasis or as a
+hyperlink. This calls for a *parsed* literal block::
+
+ .. parsed-literal::
+
+ print "Hello world!" # *tricky* code [1]_
+
+The emphasis (``*tricky*``) and footnote reference (``[1]_``) will be
+parsed.
+
+
+Can reStructuredText be used for web or generic templating?
+-----------------------------------------------------------
+
+Docutils and reStructuredText can be used with or as a component of a
+templating system, but they do not themselves include templating
+functionality. Templating should simply be left to dedicated
+templating systems. Users can choose a templating system to apply to
+their reStructuredText documents as best serves their interests.
+
+There are many good templating systems for Python (ht2html_, YAPTU_,
+Quixote_'s PTL, Cheetah_, etc.; see this non-exhaustive list of `some
+other templating systems`_), and many more for other languages, each
+with different approaches. We invite you to try several and find one
+you like. If you adapt it to use Docutils/reStructuredText, please
+consider contributing the code to Docutils or `let us know`_ and we'll
+keep a list here.
+
+One reST-specific web templating system is `rest2web
+<http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/rest2web>`_, a tool for
+automatically building websites, or parts of websites.
+
+.. _ht2html: http://ht2html.sourceforge.net/
+.. _YAPTU:
+ http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/52305
+.. _Quixote: http://www.mems-exchange.org/software/quixote/
+.. _Cheetah: http://www.cheetahtemplate.org/
+.. _some other templating systems:
+ http://webware.sourceforge.net/Papers/Templates/
+
+
+How can I mark up a FAQ or other list of questions & answers?
+-------------------------------------------------------------
+
+There is no specific syntax for FAQs and Q&A lists. Here are two
+options:
+
+1. For a FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions, usually with answers), a
+ convenient way to mark up the questions is as section titles, with
+ the answer(s) as section content. This document is marked up in
+ this way.
+
+ The advantages of using section titles for questions are: sections
+ can be numbered automatically, and a table of contents can be
+ generated automatically. One limitation of this format is that
+ questions must fit on one line (section titles may not wrap, in the
+ source text). For very long questions, the title may be a summary
+ of the question, with the full question in the section body.
+
+2. Field lists work well as Q&A lists::
+
+ :Q: What kind of questions can we
+ put here?
+
+ :A: Any kind we like!
+
+ In order to separate questions, lists can be used:
+
+ 1. :Q: What kind of question can we
+ put here?
+ :A: Any kind we like!
+
+ 2. :Q: How many answers can a question have?
+ :A: It can have one,
+ :A: or more.
+ :A3: Answers can be numbered like this.
+ :A: 1. Or like this.
+ 2. We're flexible!
+
+ If you don't want to number or otherwise mark questions, you can
+ use an empty comment between individual field lists to separate
+ them::
+
+ :Q: First question?
+ :A: Answer.
+
+ ..
+
+ :Q: Second question?
+ :A: Answer.
+
+
+HTML Writer
+===========
+
+What is the status of the HTML Writer?
+--------------------------------------
+
+The HTML Writer module, ``docutils/writers/html4css1.py``, is a
+proof-of-concept reference implementation. While it is a complete
+implementation, some aspects of the HTML it produces may be
+incompatible with older browsers or specialized applications (such as
+web templating). Alternate implementations are welcome.
+
+
+What kind of HTML does it produce?
+----------------------------------
+
+It produces XHTML compatible with the `XHTML 1.0`_ specification. A
+cascading stylesheet is required for proper viewing with a modern
+graphical browser. Correct rendering of the HTML produced depends on
+the CSS support of the browser. A general-purpose stylesheet,
+``html4css1.css`` is provided with the code, and is embedded by
+default. It is installed in the "writers/html4css1/" subdirectory
+within the Docutils package. Use the ``--help`` command-line option
+to see the specific location on your machine.
+
+.. _XHTML 1.0: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/
+
+
+What browsers are supported?
+----------------------------
+
+No specific browser is targeted; all modern graphical browsers should
+work. Some older browsers, text-only browsers, and browsers without
+full CSS support are known to produce inferior results. Firefox,
+Safari, Mozilla (version 1.0 and up), and MS Internet Explorer
+(version 5.0 and up) are known to give good results. Reports of
+experiences with other browsers are welcome.
+
+
+Unexpected results from tools/rst2html.py: H1, H1 instead of H1, H2. Why?
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Here's the question in full:
+
+ I have this text::
+
+ Heading 1
+ =========
+
+ All my life, I wanted to be H1.
+
+ Heading 1.1
+ -----------
+
+ But along came H1, and so shouldn't I be H2?
+ No! I'm H1!
+
+ Heading 1.1.1
+ *************
+
+ Yeah, imagine me, I'm stuck at H3! No?!?
+
+ When I run it through tools/rst2html.py, I get unexpected results
+ (below). I was expecting H1, H2, then H3; instead, I get H1, H1,
+ H2::
+
+ ...
+ <html lang="en">
+ <head>
+ ...
+ <title>Heading 1</title>
+ </head>
+ <body>
+ <div class="document" id="heading-1">
+ <h1 class="title">Heading 1</h1> <-- first H1
+ <p>All my life, I wanted to be H1.</p>
+ <div class="section" id="heading-1-1">
+ <h1><a name="heading-1-1">Heading 1.1</a></h1> <-- H1
+ <p>But along came H1, and so now I must be H2.</p>
+ <div class="section" id="heading-1-1-1">
+ <h2><a name="heading-1-1-1">Heading 1.1.1</a></h2>
+ <p>Yeah, imagine me, I'm stuck at H3!</p>
+ ...
+
+ What gives?
+
+Check the "class" attribute on the H1 tags, and you will see a
+difference. The first H1 is actually ``<h1 class="title">``; this is
+the document title, and the default stylesheet renders it centered.
+There can also be an ``<h2 class="subtitle">`` for the document
+subtitle.
+
+If there's only one highest-level section title at the beginning of a
+document, it is treated specially, as the document title. (Similarly, a
+lone second-highest-level section title may become the document
+subtitle.) See `How can I indicate the document title? Subtitle?`_ for
+details. Rather than use a plain H1 for the document title, we use ``<h1
+class="title">`` so that we can use H1 again within the document. Why
+do we do this? HTML only has H1-H6, so by making H1 do double duty, we
+effectively reserve these tags to provide 6 levels of heading beyond the
+single document title.
+
+HTML is being used for dumb formatting for nothing but final display.
+A stylesheet *is required*, and one is provided; see `What kind of
+HTML does it produce?`_ above. Of course, you're welcome to roll your
+own. The default stylesheet provides rules to format ``<h1
+class="title">`` and ``<h2 class="subtitle">`` differently from
+ordinary ``<h1>`` and ``<h2>``::
+
+ h1.title {
+ text-align: center }
+
+ h2.subtitle {
+ text-align: center }
+
+If you don't want the top section heading to be interpreted as a
+title at all, disable the `doctitle_xform`_ setting
+(``--no-doc-title`` option). This will interpret your document
+differently from the standard settings, which might not be a good
+idea. If you don't like the reuse of the H1 in the HTML output, you
+can tweak the `initial_header_level`_ setting
+(``--initial-header-level`` option) -- but unless you match its value
+to your specific document, you might end up with bad HTML (e.g. H3
+without H2).
+
+.. _doctitle_xform:
+ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/config.html#doctitle-xform
+.. _initial_header_level:
+ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/config.html#initial-header-level
+
+(Thanks to Mark McEahern for the question and much of the answer.)
+
+
+Why do enumerated lists only use numbers (no letters or roman numerals)?
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+The rendering of enumerators (the numbers or letters acting as list
+markers) is completely governed by the stylesheet, so either the
+browser can't find the stylesheet (try using the "--embed-stylesheet"
+option), or the browser can't understand it (try a recent Firefox,
+Mozilla, Konqueror, Opera, Safari, or even MSIE).
+
+
+There appear to be garbage characters in the HTML. What's up?
+--------------------------------------------------------------
+
+What you're seeing is most probably not garbage, but the result of a
+mismatch between the actual encoding of the HTML output and the
+encoding your browser is expecting. Your browser is misinterpreting
+the HTML data, which is encoded text. A discussion of text encodings
+is beyond the scope of this FAQ; see one or more of these documents
+for more info:
+
+* `UTF-8 and Unicode FAQ for Unix/Linux
+ <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html>`_
+
+* Chapters 3 and 4 of `Introduction to i18n [Internationalization]
+ <http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/intro-i18n/>`_
+
+* `Python Unicode Tutorial
+ <http://www.reportlab.com/i18n/python_unicode_tutorial.html>`_
+
+* `Python Unicode Objects: Some Observations on Working With Non-ASCII
+ Character Sets <http://effbot.org/zone/unicode-objects.htm>`_
+
+The common case is with the default output encoding (UTF-8), when
+either numbered sections are used (via the "sectnum_" directive) or
+symbol-footnotes. 3 non-breaking spaces are inserted in each numbered
+section title, between the generated number and the title text. Most
+footnote symbols are not available in ASCII, nor are non-breaking
+spaces. When encoded with UTF-8 and viewed with ordinary ASCII tools,
+these characters will appear to be multi-character garbage.
+
+You may have an decoding problem in your browser (or editor, etc.).
+The encoding of the output is set to "utf-8", but your browswer isn't
+recognizing that. You can either try to fix your browser (enable
+"UTF-8 character set", sometimes called "Unicode"), or choose a
+different encoding for the HTML output. You can also try
+``--output-encoding=ascii:xmlcharrefreplace`` for HTML (not applicable
+to non-XMLish outputs).
+
+If you're generating document fragments, the "Content-Type" metadata
+(between the HTML ``<head>`` and ``</head>`` tags) must agree with the
+encoding of the rest of the document. For UTF-8, it should be::
+
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+
+Also, Docutils normally generates an XML declaration as the first line
+of the output. It must also match the document encoding. For UTF-8::
+
+ <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
+
+.. _sectnum:
+ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#sectnum
+
+
+How can I retrieve the body of the HTML document?
+-------------------------------------------------
+
+(This is usually needed when using Docutils in conjunction with a
+templating system.)
+
+You can use the `docutils.core.publish_parts()`_ function, which
+returns a dictionary containing an 'html_body_' entry.
+
+.. _docutils.core.publish_parts():
+ docs/api/publisher.html#publish-parts
+.. _html_body:
+ docs/api/publisher.html#html-body
+
+
+Why is the Docutils XHTML served as "Content-type: text/html"?
+--------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Full question:
+
+ Docutils' HTML output looks like XHTML and is advertised as such::
+
+ <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
+ <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xht ml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
+
+ But this is followed by::
+
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+
+ Shouldn't this be "application/xhtml+xml" instead of "text/html"?
+
+In a perfect web, the Docutils XHTML output would be 100% strict
+XHTML. But it's not a perfect web, and a major source of imperfection
+is Internet Explorer. Despite it's drawbacks, IE still represents the
+majority of web browsers, and cannot be ignored.
+
+Short answer: if we didn't serve XHTML as "text/html" (which is a
+perfectly valid thing to do), it couldn't be viewed in Internet
+Explorer.
+
+Long answer: see the `"Criticisms of Internet Explorer" Wikipedia
+entry <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticisms_of_Internet_Explorer#XHTML>`__.
+
+However, there's also `Sending XHTML as text/html Considered
+Harmful`__. What to do, what to do? We're damned no matter what we
+do. So we'll continue to do the practical instead of the pure:
+support the browsers that are actually out there, and not fight for
+strict standards compliance.
+
+__ http://hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml
+
+(Thanks to Martin F. Krafft, Robert Kern, Michael Foord, and Alan
+G. Isaac.)
+
+
+Python Source Reader
+====================
+
+Can I use Docutils for Python auto-documentation?
+-------------------------------------------------
+
+Yes, in conjunction with other projects.
+
+Docstring extraction functionality from within Docutils is still under
+development. There is most of a source code parsing module in
+docutils/readers/python/moduleparser.py. We do plan to finish it
+eventually. Ian Bicking wrote an initial front end for the
+moduleparser.py module, in sandbox/ianb/extractor/extractor.py. Ian
+also did some work on the Python Source Reader
+(docutils.readers.python) component at PyCon DC 2004.
+
+Version 2.0 of Ed Loper's `Epydoc <http://epydoc.sourceforge.net/>`_
+supports reStructuredText-format docstrings for HTML output. Docutils
+0.3 or newer is required. Development of a Docutils-specific
+auto-documentation tool will continue. Epydoc works by importing
+Python modules to be documented, whereas the Docutils-specific tool,
+described above, will parse modules without importing them (as with
+`HappyDoc <http://happydoc.sourceforge.net/>`_, which doesn't support
+reStructuredText).
+
+The advantages of parsing over importing are security and flexibility;
+the disadvantage is complexity/difficulty.
+
+* Security: untrusted code that shouldn't be executed can be parsed;
+ importing a module executes its top-level code.
+* Flexibility: comments and unofficial docstrings (those not supported
+ by Python syntax) can only be processed by parsing.
+* Complexity/difficulty: it's a lot harder to parse and analyze a
+ module than it is to ``import`` and analyze one.
+
+For more details, please see "Docstring Extraction Rules" in `PEP
+258`_, item 3 ("How").
+
+
+Miscellaneous
+=============
+
+Is the Docutils document model based on any existing XML models?
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Not directly, no. It borrows bits from DocBook, HTML, and others. I
+(David Goodger) have designed several document models over the years,
+and have my own biases. The Docutils document model is designed for
+simplicity and extensibility, and has been influenced by the needs of
+the reStructuredText markup.