summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNed Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com>2012-11-23 17:38:03 -0500
committerNed Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com>2012-11-23 17:38:03 -0500
commitb18119c4949b4a4750a52ea8835e64f520b08c8a (patch)
tree6ad7c46324e7cc83c7360bab27103546d6e90aea
parent730e8d616d8e11f7f024873c782df06a41cbdcf9 (diff)
parentd11287ed83950deb3d8a19927dcd5063977a96f3 (diff)
downloadpython-coveragepy-b18119c4949b4a4750a52ea8835e64f520b08c8a.tar.gz
Merged, I thought?
-rw-r--r--CHANGES.txt6
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/CHANGES.txt b/CHANGES.txt
index e40be84..6ba1f34 100644
--- a/CHANGES.txt
+++ b/CHANGES.txt
@@ -65,6 +65,11 @@ Version 3.6b1
- Running coverage under a debugger is unlikely to work, but it shouldn't fail
with "TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable". Fixes `issue 201`_.
+- On some Linux distributions, when installed with the OS package manager,
+ coverage.py would report its own code as part of the results. Now it won't,
+ fixing `issue 214`_, though this will take some time to be repackaged by the
+ operating systems.
+
- Docstrings for the legacy singleton methods are more helpful. Thanks Marius
Gedminas. Closes `issue 205`_.
@@ -94,6 +99,7 @@ Version 3.6b1
.. _issue 205: https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issue/205/make-pydoc-coverage-more-friendly
.. _issue 206: https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issue/206/pydoc-coveragecoverage-fails-with-an-error
.. _issue 210: https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issue/210/if-theres-no-coverage-data-coverage-xml
+.. _issue 214: https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issue/214/coveragepy-measures-itself-on-precise
Version 3.5.3 --- 29 September 2012