1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
|
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* pg_enum.c
* routines to support manipulation of the pg_enum relation
*
* Copyright (c) 2006-2013, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* src/backend/catalog/pg_enum.c
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#include "postgres.h"
#include "access/genam.h"
#include "access/heapam.h"
#include "access/htup_details.h"
#include "access/xact.h"
#include "catalog/catalog.h"
#include "catalog/indexing.h"
#include "catalog/pg_enum.h"
#include "catalog/pg_type.h"
#include "storage/lmgr.h"
#include "miscadmin.h"
#include "utils/builtins.h"
#include "utils/catcache.h"
#include "utils/fmgroids.h"
#include "utils/syscache.h"
#include "utils/tqual.h"
/* Potentially set by contrib/pg_upgrade_support functions */
Oid binary_upgrade_next_pg_enum_oid = InvalidOid;
static void RenumberEnumType(Relation pg_enum, HeapTuple *existing, int nelems);
static int oid_cmp(const void *p1, const void *p2);
static int sort_order_cmp(const void *p1, const void *p2);
/*
* EnumValuesCreate
* Create an entry in pg_enum for each of the supplied enum values.
*
* vals is a list of Value strings.
*/
void
EnumValuesCreate(Oid enumTypeOid, List *vals)
{
Relation pg_enum;
NameData enumlabel;
Oid *oids;
int elemno,
num_elems;
Datum values[Natts_pg_enum];
bool nulls[Natts_pg_enum];
ListCell *lc;
HeapTuple tup;
num_elems = list_length(vals);
/*
* We do not bother to check the list of values for duplicates --- if you
* have any, you'll get a less-than-friendly unique-index violation. It is
* probably not worth trying harder.
*/
pg_enum = heap_open(EnumRelationId, RowExclusiveLock);
/*
* Allocate OIDs for the enum's members.
*
* While this method does not absolutely guarantee that we generate no
* duplicate OIDs (since we haven't entered each oid into the table before
* allocating the next), trouble could only occur if the OID counter wraps
* all the way around before we finish. Which seems unlikely.
*/
oids = (Oid *) palloc(num_elems * sizeof(Oid));
for (elemno = 0; elemno < num_elems; elemno++)
{
/*
* We assign even-numbered OIDs to all the new enum labels. This
* tells the comparison functions the OIDs are in the correct sort
* order and can be compared directly.
*/
Oid new_oid;
do
{
new_oid = GetNewOid(pg_enum);
} while (new_oid & 1);
oids[elemno] = new_oid;
}
/* sort them, just in case OID counter wrapped from high to low */
qsort(oids, num_elems, sizeof(Oid), oid_cmp);
/* and make the entries */
memset(nulls, false, sizeof(nulls));
elemno = 0;
foreach(lc, vals)
{
char *lab = strVal(lfirst(lc));
/*
* labels are stored in a name field, for easier syscache lookup, so
* check the length to make sure it's within range.
*/
if (strlen(lab) > (NAMEDATALEN - 1))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_NAME),
errmsg("invalid enum label \"%s\"", lab),
errdetail("Labels must be %d characters or less.",
NAMEDATALEN - 1)));
values[Anum_pg_enum_enumtypid - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(enumTypeOid);
values[Anum_pg_enum_enumsortorder - 1] = Float4GetDatum(elemno + 1);
namestrcpy(&enumlabel, lab);
values[Anum_pg_enum_enumlabel - 1] = NameGetDatum(&enumlabel);
tup = heap_form_tuple(RelationGetDescr(pg_enum), values, nulls);
HeapTupleSetOid(tup, oids[elemno]);
simple_heap_insert(pg_enum, tup);
CatalogUpdateIndexes(pg_enum, tup);
heap_freetuple(tup);
elemno++;
}
/* clean up */
pfree(oids);
heap_close(pg_enum, RowExclusiveLock);
}
/*
* EnumValuesDelete
* Remove all the pg_enum entries for the specified enum type.
*/
void
EnumValuesDelete(Oid enumTypeOid)
{
Relation pg_enum;
ScanKeyData key[1];
SysScanDesc scan;
HeapTuple tup;
pg_enum = heap_open(EnumRelationId, RowExclusiveLock);
ScanKeyInit(&key[0],
Anum_pg_enum_enumtypid,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ,
ObjectIdGetDatum(enumTypeOid));
scan = systable_beginscan(pg_enum, EnumTypIdLabelIndexId, true,
SnapshotNow, 1, key);
while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = systable_getnext(scan)))
{
simple_heap_delete(pg_enum, &tup->t_self);
}
systable_endscan(scan);
heap_close(pg_enum, RowExclusiveLock);
}
/*
* AddEnumLabel
* Add a new label to the enum set. By default it goes at
* the end, but the user can choose to place it before or
* after any existing set member.
*/
void
AddEnumLabel(Oid enumTypeOid,
const char *newVal,
const char *neighbor,
bool newValIsAfter,
bool skipIfExists)
{
Relation pg_enum;
Oid newOid;
Datum values[Natts_pg_enum];
bool nulls[Natts_pg_enum];
NameData enumlabel;
HeapTuple enum_tup;
float4 newelemorder;
HeapTuple *existing;
CatCList *list;
int nelems;
int i;
/* check length of new label is ok */
if (strlen(newVal) > (NAMEDATALEN - 1))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_NAME),
errmsg("invalid enum label \"%s\"", newVal),
errdetail("Labels must be %d characters or less.",
NAMEDATALEN - 1)));
/*
* Acquire a lock on the enum type, which we won't release until commit.
* This ensures that two backends aren't concurrently modifying the same
* enum type. Without that, we couldn't be sure to get a consistent view
* of the enum members via the syscache. Note that this does not block
* other backends from inspecting the type; see comments for
* RenumberEnumType.
*/
LockDatabaseObject(TypeRelationId, enumTypeOid, 0, ExclusiveLock);
/*
* Check if label is already in use. The unique index on pg_enum would
* catch this anyway, but we prefer a friendlier error message, and
* besides we need a check to support IF NOT EXISTS.
*/
enum_tup = SearchSysCache2(ENUMTYPOIDNAME,
ObjectIdGetDatum(enumTypeOid),
CStringGetDatum(newVal));
if (HeapTupleIsValid(enum_tup))
{
ReleaseSysCache(enum_tup);
if (skipIfExists)
{
ereport(NOTICE,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DUPLICATE_OBJECT),
errmsg("enum label \"%s\" already exists, skipping",
newVal)));
return;
}
else
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DUPLICATE_OBJECT),
errmsg("enum label \"%s\" already exists",
newVal)));
}
pg_enum = heap_open(EnumRelationId, RowExclusiveLock);
/* If we have to renumber the existing members, we restart from here */
restart:
/* Get the list of existing members of the enum */
list = SearchSysCacheList1(ENUMTYPOIDNAME,
ObjectIdGetDatum(enumTypeOid));
nelems = list->n_members;
/* Sort the existing members by enumsortorder */
existing = (HeapTuple *) palloc(nelems * sizeof(HeapTuple));
for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++)
existing[i] = &(list->members[i]->tuple);
qsort(existing, nelems, sizeof(HeapTuple), sort_order_cmp);
if (neighbor == NULL)
{
/*
* Put the new label at the end of the list. No change to existing
* tuples is required.
*/
if (nelems > 0)
{
Form_pg_enum en = (Form_pg_enum) GETSTRUCT(existing[nelems - 1]);
newelemorder = en->enumsortorder + 1;
}
else
newelemorder = 1;
}
else
{
/* BEFORE or AFTER was specified */
int nbr_index;
int other_nbr_index;
Form_pg_enum nbr_en;
Form_pg_enum other_nbr_en;
/* Locate the neighbor element */
for (nbr_index = 0; nbr_index < nelems; nbr_index++)
{
Form_pg_enum en = (Form_pg_enum) GETSTRUCT(existing[nbr_index]);
if (strcmp(NameStr(en->enumlabel), neighbor) == 0)
break;
}
if (nbr_index >= nelems)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is not an existing enum label",
neighbor)));
nbr_en = (Form_pg_enum) GETSTRUCT(existing[nbr_index]);
/*
* Attempt to assign an appropriate enumsortorder value: one less than
* the smallest member, one more than the largest member, or halfway
* between two existing members.
*
* In the "halfway" case, because of the finite precision of float4,
* we might compute a value that's actually equal to one or the other
* of its neighbors. In that case we renumber the existing members
* and try again.
*/
if (newValIsAfter)
other_nbr_index = nbr_index + 1;
else
other_nbr_index = nbr_index - 1;
if (other_nbr_index < 0)
newelemorder = nbr_en->enumsortorder - 1;
else if (other_nbr_index >= nelems)
newelemorder = nbr_en->enumsortorder + 1;
else
{
other_nbr_en = (Form_pg_enum) GETSTRUCT(existing[other_nbr_index]);
newelemorder = (nbr_en->enumsortorder +
other_nbr_en->enumsortorder) / 2;
/*
* On some machines, newelemorder may be in a register that's
* wider than float4. We need to force it to be rounded to float4
* precision before making the following comparisons, or we'll get
* wrong results. (Such behavior violates the C standard, but
* fixing the compilers is out of our reach.)
*/
newelemorder = DatumGetFloat4(Float4GetDatum(newelemorder));
if (newelemorder == nbr_en->enumsortorder ||
newelemorder == other_nbr_en->enumsortorder)
{
RenumberEnumType(pg_enum, existing, nelems);
/* Clean up and start over */
pfree(existing);
ReleaseCatCacheList(list);
goto restart;
}
}
}
/* Get a new OID for the new label */
if (IsBinaryUpgrade && OidIsValid(binary_upgrade_next_pg_enum_oid))
{
/*
* Use binary-upgrade override for pg_enum.oid, if supplied. During
* binary upgrade, all pg_enum.oid's are set this way so they are
* guaranteed to be consistent.
*/
if (neighbor != NULL)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
errmsg("ALTER TYPE ADD BEFORE/AFTER is incompatible with binary upgrade")));
newOid = binary_upgrade_next_pg_enum_oid;
binary_upgrade_next_pg_enum_oid = InvalidOid;
}
else
{
/*
* Normal case: we need to allocate a new Oid for the value.
*
* We want to give the new element an even-numbered Oid if it's safe,
* which is to say it compares correctly to all pre-existing even
* numbered Oids in the enum. Otherwise, we must give it an odd Oid.
*/
for (;;)
{
bool sorts_ok;
/* Get a new OID (different from all existing pg_enum tuples) */
newOid = GetNewOid(pg_enum);
/*
* Detect whether it sorts correctly relative to existing
* even-numbered labels of the enum. We can ignore existing
* labels with odd Oids, since a comparison involving one of those
* will not take the fast path anyway.
*/
sorts_ok = true;
for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++)
{
HeapTuple exists_tup = existing[i];
Form_pg_enum exists_en = (Form_pg_enum) GETSTRUCT(exists_tup);
Oid exists_oid = HeapTupleGetOid(exists_tup);
if (exists_oid & 1)
continue; /* ignore odd Oids */
if (exists_en->enumsortorder < newelemorder)
{
/* should sort before */
if (exists_oid >= newOid)
{
sorts_ok = false;
break;
}
}
else
{
/* should sort after */
if (exists_oid <= newOid)
{
sorts_ok = false;
break;
}
}
}
if (sorts_ok)
{
/* If it's even and sorts OK, we're done. */
if ((newOid & 1) == 0)
break;
/*
* If it's odd, and sorts OK, loop back to get another OID and
* try again. Probably, the next available even OID will sort
* correctly too, so it's worth trying.
*/
}
else
{
/*
* If it's odd, and does not sort correctly, we're done.
* (Probably, the next available even OID would sort
* incorrectly too, so no point in trying again.)
*/
if (newOid & 1)
break;
/*
* If it's even, and does not sort correctly, loop back to get
* another OID and try again. (We *must* reject this case.)
*/
}
}
}
/* Done with info about existing members */
pfree(existing);
ReleaseCatCacheList(list);
/* Create the new pg_enum entry */
memset(nulls, false, sizeof(nulls));
values[Anum_pg_enum_enumtypid - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(enumTypeOid);
values[Anum_pg_enum_enumsortorder - 1] = Float4GetDatum(newelemorder);
namestrcpy(&enumlabel, newVal);
values[Anum_pg_enum_enumlabel - 1] = NameGetDatum(&enumlabel);
enum_tup = heap_form_tuple(RelationGetDescr(pg_enum), values, nulls);
HeapTupleSetOid(enum_tup, newOid);
simple_heap_insert(pg_enum, enum_tup);
CatalogUpdateIndexes(pg_enum, enum_tup);
heap_freetuple(enum_tup);
heap_close(pg_enum, RowExclusiveLock);
}
/*
* RenumberEnumType
* Renumber existing enum elements to have sort positions 1..n.
*
* We avoid doing this unless absolutely necessary; in most installations
* it will never happen. The reason is that updating existing pg_enum
* entries creates hazards for other backends that are concurrently reading
* pg_enum with SnapshotNow semantics. A concurrent SnapshotNow scan could
* see both old and new versions of an updated row as valid, or neither of
* them, if the commit happens between scanning the two versions. It's
* also quite likely for a concurrent scan to see an inconsistent set of
* rows (some members updated, some not).
*
* We can avoid these risks by reading pg_enum with an MVCC snapshot
* instead of SnapshotNow, but that forecloses use of the syscaches.
* We therefore make the following choices:
*
* 1. Any code that is interested in the enumsortorder values MUST read
* pg_enum with an MVCC snapshot, or else acquire lock on the enum type
* to prevent concurrent execution of AddEnumLabel(). The risk of
* seeing inconsistent values of enumsortorder is too high otherwise.
*
* 2. Code that is not examining enumsortorder can use a syscache
* (for example, enum_in and enum_out do so). The worst that can happen
* is a transient failure to find any valid value of the row. This is
* judged acceptable in view of the infrequency of use of RenumberEnumType.
*/
static void
RenumberEnumType(Relation pg_enum, HeapTuple *existing, int nelems)
{
int i;
/*
* We should only need to increase existing elements' enumsortorders,
* never decrease them. Therefore, work from the end backwards, to avoid
* unwanted uniqueness violations.
*/
for (i = nelems - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
HeapTuple newtup;
Form_pg_enum en;
float4 newsortorder;
newtup = heap_copytuple(existing[i]);
en = (Form_pg_enum) GETSTRUCT(newtup);
newsortorder = i + 1;
if (en->enumsortorder != newsortorder)
{
en->enumsortorder = newsortorder;
simple_heap_update(pg_enum, &newtup->t_self, newtup);
CatalogUpdateIndexes(pg_enum, newtup);
}
heap_freetuple(newtup);
}
/* Make the updates visible */
CommandCounterIncrement();
}
/* qsort comparison function for oids */
static int
oid_cmp(const void *p1, const void *p2)
{
Oid v1 = *((const Oid *) p1);
Oid v2 = *((const Oid *) p2);
if (v1 < v2)
return -1;
if (v1 > v2)
return 1;
return 0;
}
/* qsort comparison function for tuples by sort order */
static int
sort_order_cmp(const void *p1, const void *p2)
{
HeapTuple v1 = *((const HeapTuple *) p1);
HeapTuple v2 = *((const HeapTuple *) p2);
Form_pg_enum en1 = (Form_pg_enum) GETSTRUCT(v1);
Form_pg_enum en2 = (Form_pg_enum) GETSTRUCT(v2);
if (en1->enumsortorder < en2->enumsortorder)
return -1;
else if (en1->enumsortorder > en2->enumsortorder)
return 1;
else
return 0;
}
|