summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mysql-test/suite/maria
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Fixed crashing bug in recursive SQL if write to tmp table would failMonty2023-03-022-0/+120
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This error was discovered while working on MDEV-30540 Wrong result with IN list length reaching IN_PREDICATE_CONVERSION_THRESHOLD If there is read error from handler::ha_rnd_next() during a recursive query, st_select_lex_unit::exec_recursive() will crash as it will try to get the error code from a structure that was deleted by the callee. The code was using the construct: sl->join->exec(); saved_error=sl->join->error; This does not work as sl->join was freed by the exec() and sl->join would be set to 0. Fixed by having JOIN::exec() return the error code. The included test case simulates the error in ha_rnd_next(), which causes a crash without the patch. scovered whle working on MDEV-30540 Wrong result with IN list length reaching IN_PREDICATE_CONVERSION_THRESHOLD If there is read error from handler::ha_rnd_next() during a recursive query, st_select_lex_unit::exec_recursive() will crash as it will try to get the error code from a structure that was deleted by the callee. The code was using the construct: sl->join->exec(); saved_error=sl->join->error; This does not work as sl->join was freed by the exec() and sl->join was set to 0. Fixed by having JOIN::exec() return the error code. The included test case simulates the error in ha_rnd_next(), which causes a crash without the patch.
* Adjust costs for rowid filterMonty2023-02-211-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Use log2() insted of log() - Added missing ''+' when calculating rowid setup cost - Adjusted ROWID_FILTER_PER_ELEMENT_MODIFIER (from 3 to 1) Other things: - Adjusted cost for index_merge where rows_out < 1.0 The effects of the changes: - rowid filter will have higher setup cost - rowid filter will have slightly less costs per row This can be seen in mtr where some tests, with 'small tables or that uses rowid filters with many rows, will not use rowid filter anymore.
* Change cost for REF to take into account cost for 1 extra key read_nextMonty2023-02-101-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The main difference in code path between EQ_REF and REF is that for REF we have to do an extra read_next on the index to check that there is no more matching rows. Before this patch we added a preference of EQ_REF by ensuring that REF would always estimate to find at least 2 rows. This patch adds the cost of the extra key read_next to REF access and removes the code that limited REF to at least 2 rows. For some queries this can have a big effect as the total estimated rows will be halved for each REF table with 1 rows. multi_range cost calculations are also changed to take into account the difference between EQ_REF and REF. The effect of the patch to the test suite: - About 80 test case changed - Almost all changes where for EXPLAIN where estimated rows for REF where changed from 2 to 1. - A few test cases using explain extended had a change of 'filtered'. This is because of the estimated rows are now closer to the calculated selectivity. - A very few test had a change of table order. This is because the change of estimated rows from 2 to 1 or the small cost change for REF (main.subselect_sj_jcl6, main.group_by, main.dervied_cond_pushdown, main.distinct, main.join_nested, main.order_by, main.join_cache) - No key statistics and the estimated rows are now smaller which cased estimated filtering to be lower. (main.subselect_sj_mat) - The number of total rows are halved. (main.derived_cond_pushdown) - Plans with 1 row changed to use RANGE instead of REF. (main.group_min_max) - ALL changed to REF (main.key_diff) - Key changed from ref + index_only to PRIMARY key for InnoDB, as OPTIMIZER_ROW_LOOKUP_COST + OPTIMIZER_ROW_NEXT_FIND_COST is smaller than OPTIMIZER_KEY_LOOKUP_COST + OPTIMIZER_KEY_NEXT_FIND_COST. (main.join_outer_innodb) - Cost changes printouts (main.opt_trace*) - Result order change (innodb_gis.rtree)
* Added rowid_filter support to AriaMonty2023-02-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This includes: - cleanup and optimization of filtering and pushdown engine code. - Adjusted costs for rowid filters (based on extensive testing and profiling). This made a small two changes to the handler_rowid_filter_is_active() API: - One should not call it with a zero pointer! - One does not need to call handler_rowid_filter_is_active() for every row anymore. It is enough to check if filter is active by calling it call it during index_init() or when handler::rowid_filter_changed() is called The changes was to avoid unnecessary function calls and checks if pushdown conditions and rowid_filter is not used. Updated costs for rowid_filter_lookup() to be closer to reality. The old cost was based only on rowid_compare_cost. This is now changed to take into account the overhead in checking the rowid. Changed the Range_rowid_filter class to use DYNAMIC_ARRAY directly instead of Dynamic_array<>. This was done to be able to use the new append_dynamic() functions which gives a notable speed improvment compared to the old code. Removing the abstraction also makes the code easier to understand. The cost of filtering is now slightly lower than before, which is reflected in some test cases that is now using rowid filters.
* Added test cases for preceding testMonty2023-02-032-13/+27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This includes all test changes from "Changing all cost calculation to be given in milliseconds" and forwards. Some of the things that caused changes in the result files: - As part of fixing tests, I added 'echo' to some comments to be able to easier find out where things where wrong. - MATERIALIZED has now a higher cost compared to X than before. Because of this some MATERIALIZED types have changed to DEPENDEND SUBQUERY. - Some test cases that required MATERIALIZED to repeat a bug was changed by adding more rows to force MATERIALIZED to happen. - 'Filtered' in SHOW EXPLAIN has in many case changed from 100.00 to something smaller. This is because now filtered also takes into account the smallest possible ref access and filters, even if they where not used. Another reason for 'Filtered' being smaller is that we now also take into account implicit filtering done for subqueries using FIRSTMATCH. (main.subselect_no_exists_to_in) This is caluculated in best_access_path() and stored in records_out. - Table orders has changed because more accurate costs. - 'index' and 'ALL' for small tables has changed to use 'range' or 'ref' because of optimizer_scan_setup_cost. - index can be changed to 'range' as 'range' optimizer assumes we don't have to read the blocks from disk that range optimizer has already read. This can be confusing in the case where there is no obvious where clause but instead there is a hidden 'key_column > NULL' added by the optimizer. (main.subselect_no_exists_to_in) - Scan on primary clustered key does not report 'Using Index' anymore (It's a table scan, not an index scan). - For derived tables, the number of rows is now 100 instead of 2, which can be seen in EXPLAIN. - More tests have "Using index for group by" as the cost of this optimization is now more correct (lower). - A primary key could be preferred for a normal key, even if it would access more rows, as it's faster to do 1 lokoup and 3 'index_next' on a clustered primary key than one lookup trough a secondary. (main.stat_tables_innodb) Notes: - There was a 4.7% more calls to best_extension_by_limited_search() in the main.greedy_optimizer test. However examining the test results it looked that the plans where slightly better (eq_ref where more chained together) so I assume this is ok. - I have verified a few test cases where there was notable/unexpected changes in the plan and in all cases the new optimizer plans where faster. (main.greedy_optimizer and some others)
* Update row and key fetch cost models to take into account data copy costsMonty2023-02-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Before this patch, when calculating the cost of fetching and using a row/key from the engine, we took into account the cost of finding a row or key from the engine, but did not consistently take into account index only accessed, clustered key or covered keys for all access paths. The cost of the WHERE clause (TIME_FOR_COMPARE) was not consistently considered in best_access_path(). TIME_FOR_COMPARE was used in calculation in other places, like greedy_search(), but was in some cases (like scans) done an a different number of rows than was accessed. The cost calculation of row and index scans didn't take into account the number of rows that where accessed, only the number of accepted rows. When using a filter, the cost of index_only_reads and cost of accessing and disregarding 'filtered rows' where not taken into account, which made filters cost less than there actually where. To remedy the above, the following key & row fetch related costs has been added: - The cost of fetching and using a row is now split into different costs: - key + Row fetch cost (as before) but multiplied with the variable 'optimizer_cache_cost' (default to 0.5). This allows the user to tell the optimizer the likehood of finding the key and row in the engine cache. - ROW_COPY_COST, The cost copying a row from the engine to the sql layer or creating a row from the join_cache to the record buffer. Mostly affects table scan costs. - ROW_LOOKUP_COST, the cost of fetching a row by rowid. - KEY_COPY_COST the cost of finding the next key and copying it from the engine to the SQL layer. This is used when we calculate the cost index only reads. It makes index scans more expensive than before if they cover a lot of rows. (main.index_merge_myisam) - KEY_LOOKUP_COST, the cost of finding the first key in a range. This replaces the old define IDX_LOOKUP_COST, but with a higher cost. - KEY_NEXT_FIND_COST, the cost of finding the next key (and rowid). when doing a index scan and comparing the rowid to the filter. Before this cost was assumed to be 0. All of the above constants/variables are now tuned to be somewhat in proportion of executing complexity to each other. There is tuning need for these in the future, but that can wait until the above are made user variables as that will make tuning much easier. To make the usage of the above easy, there are new (not virtual) cost calclation functions in handler: - ha_read_time(), like read_time(), but take optimizer_cache_cost into account. - ha_read_and_copy_time(), like ha_read_time() but take into account ROW_COPY_TIME - ha_read_and_compare_time(), like ha_read_and_copy_time() but take TIME_FOR_COMPARE into account. - ha_rnd_pos_time(). Read row with row id, taking ROW_COPY_COST into account. This is used with filesort where we don't need to execute the WHERE clause again. - ha_keyread_time(), like keyread_time() but take optimizer_cache_cost into account. - ha_keyread_and_copy_time(), like ha_keyread_time(), but add KEY_COPY_COST. - ha_key_scan_time(), like key_scan_time() but take optimizer_cache_cost nto account. - ha_key_scan_and_compare_time(), like ha_key_scan_time(), but add KEY_COPY_COST & TIME_FOR_COMPARE. I also added some setup costs for doing different types of scans and creating temporary tables (on disk and in memory). This encourages the optimizer to not use these for simple 'a few row' lookups if there are adequate key lookup strategies. - TABLE_SCAN_SETUP_COST, cost of starting a table scan. - INDEX_SCAN_SETUP_COST, cost of starting an index scan. - HEAP_TEMPTABLE_CREATE_COST, cost of creating in memory temporary table. - DISK_TEMPTABLE_CREATE_COST, cost of creating an on disk temporary table. When calculating cost of fetching ranges, we had a cost of IDX_LOOKUP_COST (0.125) for doing a key div for a new range. This is now replaced with 'io_cost * KEY_LOOKUP_COST (1.0) * optimizer_cache_cost', which matches the cost we use for 'ref' and other key lookups. The effect is that the cost is now a bit higher when we have many ranges for a key. Allmost all calculation with TIME_FOR_COMPARE is now done in best_access_path(). 'JOIN::read_time' now includes the full cost for finding the rows in the table. In the result files, many of the changes are now again close to what they where before the "Update cost for hash and cached joins" commit, as that commit didn't fix the filter cost (too complex to do everything in one commit). The above changes showed a lot of a lot of inconsistencies in optimizer cost calculation. The main objective with the other changes was to do calculation as similar (and accurate) as possible and to make different plans more comparable. Detailed list of changes: - Calculate index_only_cost consistently and correctly for all scan and ref accesses. The row fetch_cost and index_only_cost now takes into account clustered keys, covered keys and index only accesses. - cost_for_index_read now returns both full cost and index_only_cost - Fixed cost calculation of get_sweep_read_cost() to match other similar costs. This is bases on the assumption that data is more often stored on SSD than a hard disk. - Replaced constant 2.0 with new define TABLE_SCAN_SETUP_COST. - Some scan cost estimates did not take into account TIME_FOR_COMPARE. Now all scan costs takes this into account. (main.show_explain) - Added session variable optimizer_cache_hit_ratio (default 50%). By adjusting this on can reduce or increase the cost of index or direct record lookups. The effect of the default is that key lookups is now a bit cheaper than before. See usage of 'optimizer_cache_cost' in handler.h. - JOIN_TAB::scan_time() did not take into account index only scans, which produced a wrong cost when index scan was used. Changed JOIN_TAB:::scan_time() to take into consideration clustered and covered keys. The values are now cached and we only have to call this function once. Other calls are changed to use the cached values. Function renamed to JOIN_TAB::estimate_scan_time(). - Fixed that most index cost calculations are done the same way and more close to 'range' calculations. The cost is now lower than before for small data sets and higher for large data sets as we take into account how many keys are read (main.opt_trace_selectivity, main.limit_rows_examined). - Ensured that index_scan_cost() == range(scan_of_all_rows_in_table_using_one_range) + MULTI_RANGE_READ_INFO_CONST. One effect of this is that if there is choice of doing a full index scan and a range-index scan over almost the whole table then index scan will be preferred (no range-read setup cost). (innodb.innodb, main.show_explain, main.range) - Fixed the EQ_REF and REF takes into account clustered and covered keys. This changes some plans to use covered or clustered indexes as these are much cheaper. (main.subselect_mat_cost, main.state_tables_innodb, main.limit_rows_examined) - Rowid filter setup cost and filter compare cost now takes into account fetching and checking the rowid (KEY_NEXT_FIND_COST). (main.partition_pruning heap.heap_btree main.log_state) - Added KEY_NEXT_FIND_COST to Range_rowid_filter_cost_info::lookup_cost to account of the time to find and check the next key value against the container - Introduced ha_keyread_time(rows) that takes into account finding the next row and copying the key value to 'record' (KEY_COPY_COST). - Introduced ha_key_scan_time() for calculating an index scan over all rows. - Added IDX_LOOKUP_COST to keyread_time() as a startup cost. - Added index_only_fetch_cost() as a convenience function to OPT_RANGE. - keyread_time() cost is slightly reduced to prefer shorter keys. (main.index_merge_myisam) - All of the above caused some index_merge combinations to be rejected because of cost (main.index_intersect). In some cases 'ref' where replaced with index_merge because of the low cost calculation of get_sweep_read_cost(). - Some index usage moved from PRIMARY to a covering index. (main.subselect_innodb) - Changed cost calculation of filter to take KEY_LOOKUP_COST and TIME_FOR_COMPARE into account. See sql_select.cc::apply_filter(). filter parameters and costs are now written to optimizer_trace. - Don't use matchings_records_in_range() to try to estimate the number of filtered rows for ranges. The reason is that we want to ensure that 'range' is calculated similar to 'ref'. There is also more work needed to calculate the selectivity when using ranges and ranges and filtering. This causes filtering column in EXPLAIN EXTENDED to be 100.00 for some cases where range cannot use filtering. (main.rowid_filter) - Introduced ha_scan_time() that takes into account the CPU cost of finding the next row and copying the row from the engine to 'record'. This causes costs of table scan to slightly increase and some test to changed their plan from ALL to RANGE or ALL to ref. (innodb.innodb_mysql, main.select_pkeycache) In a few cases where scan time of very small tables have lower cost than a ref or range, things changed from ref/range to ALL. (main.myisam, main.func_group, main.limit_rows_examined, main.subselect2) - Introduced ha_scan_and_compare_time() which is like ha_scan_time() but also adds the cost of the where clause (TIME_FOR_COMPARE). - Added small cost for creating temporary table for materialization. This causes some very small tables to use scan instead of materialization. - Added checking of the WHERE clause (TIME_FOR_COMPARE) of the accepted rows to ROR costs in get_best_ror_intersect() - Removed '- 0.001' from 'join->best_read' and optimize_straight_join() to ensure that the 'Last_query_cost' status variable contains the same value as the one that was calculated by the optimizer. - Take avg_io_cost() into account in handler::keyread_time() and handler::read_time(). This should have no effect as it's 1.0 by default, except for heap that overrides these functions. - Some 'ref_or_null' accesses changed to 'range' because of cost adjustments (main.order_by) - Added scan type "scan_with_join_cache" for optimizer_trace. This is just to show in the trace what kind of scan was used. - When using 'scan_with_join_cache' take into account number of preceding tables (as have to restore all fields for all previous table combination when checking the where clause) The new cost added is: (row_combinations * ROW_COPY_COST * number_of_cached_tables). This increases the cost of join buffering in proportion of the number of tables in the join buffer. One effect is that full scans are now done earlier as the cost is then smaller. (main.join_outer_innodb, main.greedy_optimizer) - Removed the usage of 'worst_seeks' in cost_for_index_read as it caused wrong plans to be created; It prefered JT_EQ_REF even if it would be much more expensive than a full table scan. A related issue was that worst_seeks only applied to full lookup, not to clustered or index only lookups, which is not consistent. This caused some plans to use index scan instead of eq_ref (main.union) - Changed federated block size from 4096 to 1500, which is the typical size of an IO packet. - Added costs for reading rows to Federated. Needed as there is no caching of rows in the federated engine. - Added ha_innobase::rnd_pos_time() cost function. - A lot of extra things added to optimizer trace - More costs, especially for materialization and index_merge. - Make lables more uniform - Fixed a lot of minor bugs - Added 'trace_started()' around a lot of trace blocks. - When calculating ORDER BY with LIMIT cost for using an index the cost did not take into account the number of row retrivals that has to be done or the cost of comparing the rows with the WHERE clause. The cost calculated would be just a fraction of the real cost. Now we calculate the cost as we do for ranges and 'ref'. - 'Using index for group-by' is used a bit more than before as now take into account the WHERE clause cost when comparing with 'ref' and prefer the method with fewer row combinations. (main.group_min_max). Bugs fixed: - Fixed that we don't calculate TIME_FOR_COMPARE twice for some plans, like in optimize_straight_join() and greedy_search() - Fixed bug in save_explain_data where we could test for the wrong index when displaying 'Using index'. This caused some old plans to show 'Using index'. (main.subselect_innodb, main.subselect2) - Fixed bug in get_best_ror_intersect() where 'min_cost' was not updated, and the cost we compared with was not the one that was used. - Fixed very wrong cost calculation for priority queues in check_if_pq_applicable(). (main.order_by now correctly uses priority queue) - When calculating cost of EQ_REF or REF, we added the cost of comparing the WHERE clause with the found rows, not all row combinations. This made ref and eq_ref to be regarded way to cheap compared to other access methods. - FORCE INDEX cost calculation didn't take into account clustered or covered indexes. - JT_EQ_REF cost was estimated as avg_io_cost(), which is half the cost of a JT_REF key. This may be true for InnoDB primary key, but not for other unique keys or other engines. Now we use handler function to calculate the cost, which allows us to handle consistently clustered, covered keys and not covered keys. - ha_start_keyread() didn't call extra_opt() if keyread was already enabled but still changed the 'keyread' variable (which is wrong). Fixed by not doing anything if keyread is already enabled. - multi_range_read_info_cost() didn't take into account io_cost when calculating the cost of ranges. - fix_semijoin_strategies_for_picked_join_order() used the wrong record_count when calling best_access_path() for SJ_OPT_FIRST_MATCH and SJ_OPT_LOOSE_SCAN. - Hash joins didn't provide correct best_cost to the upper level, which means that the cost for hash_joins more expensive than calculated in best_access_path (a difference of 10x * TIME_OF_COMPARE). This is fixed in the new code thanks to that we now include TIME_OF_COMPARE cost in 'read_time'. Other things: - Added some 'if (thd->trace_started())' to speed up code - Removed not used function Cost_estimate::is_zero() - Simplified testing of HA_POS_ERROR in get_best_ror_intersect(). (No cost changes) - Moved ha_start_keyread() from join_read_const_table() to join_read_const() to enable keyread for all types of JT_CONST tables. - Made a few very short functions inline in handler.h Notes: - In main.rowid_filter the join order of order and lineitem is swapped. This is because the cost of doing a range fetch of lineitem(98 rows) is almost as big as the whole join of order,lineitem. The filtering will also ensure that we only have to do very small key fetches of the rows in lineitem. - main.index_merge_myisam had a few changes where we are now using less keys for index_merge. This is because index scans are now more expensive than before. - handler->optimizer_cache_cost is updated in ha_external_lock(). This ensures that it is up to date per statements. Not an optimal solution (for locked tables), but should be ok for now. - 'DELETE FROM t1 WHERE t1.a > 0 ORDER BY t1.a' does not take cost of filesort into consideration when table scan is chosen. (main.myisam_explain_non_select_all) - perfschema.table_aggregate_global_* has changed because an update on a table with 1 row will now use table scan instead of key lookup. TODO in upcomming commits: - Fix selectivity calculation for ranges with and without filtering and when there is a ref access but scan is chosen. For this we have to store the lowest known value for 'accepted_records' in the OPT_RANGE structure. - Change that records_read does not include filtered rows. - test_if_cheaper_ordering() needs to be updated to properly calculate costs. This will fix tests like main.order_by_innodb, main.single_delete_update - Extend get_range_limit_read_cost() to take into considering cost_for_index_read() if there where no quick keys. This will reduce the computed cost for ORDER BY with LIMIT in some cases. (main.innodb_ext_key) - Fix that we take into account selectivity when counting the number of rows we have to read when considering using a index table scan to resolve ORDER BY. - Add new calculation for rnd_pos_time() where we take into account the benefit of reading multiple rows from the same page.
* Update cost for hash and cached joinsMonty2023-02-021-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The old code did not't correctly add TIME_FOR_COMPARE to rows that are part of the scan that will be compared with the attached where clause. Now the cost calculation for hash join and full join cache join are identical except for HASH_FANOUT (10%) The cost for a join with keys is now also uniform. The total cost for a using a key for lookup is calculated in one place as: (cost_of_finding_rows_through_key(records) + records/TIME_FOR_COMPARE)* record_count_of_previous_row_combinations + startup_cost startup_cost is the cost of a creating a temporary table (if needed) Best_cost now includes the cost of comparing all WHERE clauses and also cost of joining with previous row combinations. Other things: - Optimizer trace is now printing the total costs, including testing the WHERE clause (TIME_FOR_COMPARE) and comparing with all previous rows. - In optimizer trace, include also total cost of query together with the final join order. This makes it easier to find out where the cost was calculated. - Old code used filter even if the cost for it was higher than not using a filter. This is not corrected. - When rebasing on 10.11, I noticed some changes to access_cost_factor calculation. These changes was not picked as the coming changes to filtering will make that code obsolete.
* Update matching_candidates_in_table() to treat all conditions similarMonty2023-02-021-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fixed also that the 'with_found_constraint parameter' to matching_candidates_in_table() is as documented: It is now true only if there is a reference to a previous table in the WHERE condition for the current examined table (as it was originally documented) Changes in test results: - Filtered was 25% smaller for some queries (expected). - Some join order changed (probably because the tables had very few rows). - Some more table scans, probably because there would be fewer returned rows. - Some tests exposes a bug that if there is more filtered rows, then the cost for table scan will be higher. This will be fixed in a later commit.
* Merge 10.7 into 10.8Marko Mäkelä2022-11-172-0/+3
|\
| * Merge 10.5 into 10.6Marko Mäkelä2022-11-102-0/+3
| |\
| | * MDEV-28970: Add RESET MASTER to clear possible remaining binlog from ↵asklavou2022-11-092-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | previous test
* | | Merge 10.7 into 10.8Marko Mäkelä2022-09-2118-207/+207
|\ \ \ | |/ /
| * | Merge 10.5 into 10.6Marko Mäkelä2022-09-2018-207/+207
| |\ \ | | |/
| | * A cleanup for MDEV-29446 Change SHOW CREATE TABLE to display default collationAlexander Barkov2022-09-141-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Recording test results according to MDEV-29446 changes: mysql-test/suite/maria/max_length.result
| | * Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/10.4' into 10.5Alexander Barkov2022-09-1418-205/+205
| | |\
| | | * Merge 10.3 into 10.4Marko Mäkelä2022-09-1318-205/+205
| | | |\
| | | | * MDEV-29446 Change SHOW CREATE TABLE to display default collationAlexander Barkov2022-09-1218-205/+205
| | | | |
* | | | | Merge 10.7 into 10.8Marko Mäkelä2022-07-282-6/+6
|\ \ \ \ \ | |/ / / /
| * | | | Merge 10.5 into 10.6Marko Mäkelä2022-07-272-6/+6
| |\ \ \ \ | | |/ / /
| | * | | Merge 10.4 into 10.5Marko Mäkelä2022-07-272-6/+6
| | |\ \ \ | | | |/ /
| | | * | Merge branch '10.3' into 10.4Oleksandr Byelkin2022-07-272-6/+6
| | | |\ \ | | | | |/
| | | | * MDEV-21445 Strange/inconsistent behavior of IN condition when mixing numbers ↵Alexander Barkov2022-07-062-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | and strings
| * | | | Fix ./mtr --embeddedMarko Mäkelä2022-06-104-5/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This fixes up commit 3d241eb948855dbe0688a04c8111cc78deac3c1c
* | | | | Merge 10.7 into 10.8Marko Mäkelä2022-06-144-5/+8
|\ \ \ \ \
| * | | | | Fixed maria.maria-recover and maria.encrypt-no-key test filesMonty2022-06-134-5/+8
| |/ / / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | These had been damaged during some merge which caused --embedded test to fail
* | | | | Merge 10.7 into 10.8Marko Mäkelä2022-06-096-16/+23
|\ \ \ \ \ | |/ / / /
| * | | | Improve error reporting in AriaMonty2022-06-076-16/+23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch fixes the following issues in Aria error reporting in case of read errors & crashed tables: - Added the table name to the most error messages, including in case of read errors or when encrypting/decrypting a table. The format for error messages was changed sligtly to accomodate logging of errors from lower level routines. - If we got an read error from storage (hard disk, ssd, S3 etc) we only reported 'table is crashed'. Now the error number from the storage is reported. - Added checking of read failure from records_in_range() - Calls to ma_set_fatal_error() did not inform the SQL level of errors (to not spam the user with multiple error messages). Now the first error message and any fatal error messages are reported to the user.
* | | | | Merge 10.7 into 10.8Marko Mäkelä2022-04-272-1/+26
|\ \ \ \ \ | |/ / / /
| * | | | Merge 10.5 into 10.6Marko Mäkelä2022-04-212-1/+26
| |\ \ \ \ | | |/ / /
| | * | | Merge 10.4 into 10.5Marko Mäkelä2022-04-212-1/+26
| | |\ \ \ | | | |/ /
| | | * | Merge 10.3 into 10.4Marko Mäkelä2022-04-212-1/+24
| | | |\ \ | | | | |/
| | | | * MDEV-28269 Assertion `save_errno' in maria_write or ER_GET_ERRNOMonty2022-04-112-1/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The issue was that the value of MARIA_FOUND_WRONG_KEY was a value that could be returned by ha_key_cmp. This was already fixed in MyISAM, now using the same fix in Aria: Setting the value to INT_MAX32, which should be impossible in any normal cases. I also fixed so that if there is a wrong key, we now get a proper error message and not an assert.
* | | | | Merge 10.7 into 10.8Marko Mäkelä2022-02-231-0/+1
|\ \ \ \ \ | |/ / / /
| * | | | Merge 10.5 into 10.6Marko Mäkelä2022-02-231-0/+1
| |\ \ \ \ | | |/ / /
| | * | | Extend have_sanitizer with ASAN+UBSAN and MSANMarko Mäkelä2022-02-231-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Disable some tests that are too slow or big for MSAN.
* | | | | Merge 10.7 into 10.8Marko Mäkelä2022-02-172-0/+64
|\ \ \ \ \ | |/ / / /
| * | | | Merge 10.5 into 10.6Marko Mäkelä2022-02-172-0/+64
| |\ \ \ \ | | |/ / /
| | * | | Merge 10.4 into 10.5Marko Mäkelä2022-02-172-0/+64
| | |\ \ \ | | | |/ /
| | | * | Merge 10.3 into 10.4Marko Mäkelä2022-02-172-0/+64
| | | |\ \ | | | | |/
| | | | * MDEV-17223 Assertion `thd->killed != 0' failed in ha_maria::enable_indexesMonty2022-02-162-0/+64
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | MDEV-22500 Assertion `thd->killed != 0' failed in ha_maria::enable_indexes For MDEV-17223 the issue was an assert that didn't take into account that we could get duplicate key errors when enablling unique indexes. Fixed by not retrying repair in case of duplicate key error for this case, which avoids the assert. For MDEV-22500 I removed the assert, as it's not critical (just a way to find potential wrong code) and we will anyway get things logged in the error log if this happens. This case cannot triggered an assert in 10.3 but I verified that it would trigger in 10.5 and that this patch fixes it.
* | | | | Merge branch '10.7' into 10.8Oleksandr Byelkin2022-02-042-0/+16
|\ \ \ \ \ | |/ / / /
| * | | | Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6Oleksandr Byelkin2022-02-032-0/+16
| |\ \ \ \ | | |/ / /
| | * | | Merge branch '10.4' into 10.5Oleksandr Byelkin2022-02-012-0/+16
| | |\ \ \ | | | |/ /
| | | * | Merge branch '10.3' into 10.4Oleksandr Byelkin2022-01-302-0/+16
| | | |\ \ | | | | |/
| | | | * Merge branch '10.2' into 10.3mariadb-10.3.33Oleksandr Byelkin2022-01-292-0/+16
| | | | |\
| | | | | * MDEV-11241 Certain combining marks cause MariaDB to crash when doing ↵Sergei Golubchik2022-01-282-0/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Full-Text searches fix it for Aria too
* | | | | | MDEV-27434 DESC attribute does not work with auto-increment on secondary ↵Sergei Golubchik2022-01-262-6/+37
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | column of multi-part index when searching for the last auto-inc value, it's HA_READ_PREFIX_LAST for the ASC keypart, but HA_READ_PREFIX for the DESC one also fixes MDEV-27585
* | | | | | MDEV-27309 Server crash or ASAN memcpy-param-overlap upon INSERT into ↵Sergei Golubchik2022-01-262-0/+51
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Aria/MyISAM table with DESC key MyiSAM and Aria, indexes with prefix compression, where the first keypart could be NULL - in this case they didn't expect the next key after the not NULL key to be NULL. Expect the first keypart of the next key to have zero length even if store_not_null==1, this combination means keypart is NULL, don't pack it. also fixes MDEV-27340
* | | | | | MDEV-27303 Table corruption after insert into a non-InnoDB table with DESC indexSergei Golubchik2022-01-262-0/+83
|/ / / / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | optimized prefix search didn't take into account descending indexes also fixes MDEV-27330
* | | | | Merge 10.5 into 10.6Marko Mäkelä2021-11-092-0/+24
|\ \ \ \ \ | |/ / / /