diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'sql/opt_range.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | sql/opt_range.cc | 73 |
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/sql/opt_range.cc b/sql/opt_range.cc index 80944e97eb7..ce9c46572c7 100644 --- a/sql/opt_range.cc +++ b/sql/opt_range.cc @@ -2695,6 +2695,8 @@ int SQL_SELECT::test_quick_select(THD *thd, key_map keys_to_use, notnull_cond= head->notnull_cond; if (!records) records++; /* purecov: inspected */ + if (head->file->ha_table_flags() & HA_NON_COMPARABLE_ROWID) + only_single_index_range_scan= 1; if (head->force_index || force_quick_range) scan_time= read_time= DBL_MAX; @@ -3283,6 +3285,25 @@ double records_in_column_ranges(PARAM *param, uint idx, /* + Compare quick select ranges according to number of found rows + If there is equal amounts of rows, use the long key part. + The idea is that if we have keys (a),(a,b) and (a,b,c) and we have + a query like WHERE a=1 and b=1 and c=1, + it is better to use key (a,b,c) than (a) as it will ensure we don't also + use histograms for columns b and c +*/ + +static +int cmp_quick_ranges(TABLE *table, uint *a, uint *b) +{ + int tmp= CMP_NUM(table->opt_range[*a].rows, table->opt_range[*b].rows); + if (tmp) + return tmp; + return -CMP_NUM(table->opt_range[*a].key_parts, table->opt_range[*b].key_parts); +} + + +/* Calculate the selectivity of the condition imposed on the rows of a table SYNOPSIS @@ -3318,10 +3339,10 @@ double records_in_column_ranges(PARAM *param, uint idx, bool calculate_cond_selectivity_for_table(THD *thd, TABLE *table, Item **cond) { - uint keynr; - uint max_quick_key_parts= 0; + uint keynr, range_index, ranges; MY_BITMAP *used_fields= &table->cond_set; - double table_records= (double)table->stat_records(); + double table_records= (double)table->stat_records(); + uint optimal_key_order[MAX_KEY]; DBUG_ENTER("calculate_cond_selectivity_for_table"); table->cond_selectivity= 1.0; @@ -3360,23 +3381,21 @@ bool calculate_cond_selectivity_for_table(THD *thd, TABLE *table, Item **cond) Json_writer_object trace_wrapper(thd); Json_writer_array selectivity_for_indexes(thd, "selectivity_for_indexes"); - for (keynr= 0; keynr < table->s->keys; keynr++) - { + /* + Walk through all quick ranges in the order of least found rows. + */ + for (ranges= keynr= 0 ; keynr < table->s->keys; keynr++) if (table->opt_range_keys.is_set(keynr)) - set_if_bigger(max_quick_key_parts, table->opt_range[keynr].key_parts); - } + optimal_key_order[ranges++]= keynr; - /* - Walk through all indexes, indexes where range access uses more keyparts - go first. - */ - for (uint quick_key_parts= max_quick_key_parts; - quick_key_parts; quick_key_parts--) + my_qsort2(optimal_key_order, ranges, + sizeof(optimal_key_order[0]), + (qsort2_cmp) cmp_quick_ranges, table); + + for (range_index= 0 ; range_index < ranges ; range_index++) { - for (keynr= 0; keynr < table->s->keys; keynr++) + uint keynr= optimal_key_order[range_index]; { - if (table->opt_range_keys.is_set(keynr) && - table->opt_range[keynr].key_parts == quick_key_parts) { uint i; uint used_key_parts= table->opt_range[keynr].key_parts; @@ -10270,7 +10289,7 @@ key_or(RANGE_OPT_PARAM *param, SEL_ARG *key1,SEL_ARG *key2) uint max_part_no= MY_MAX(key1->max_part_no, key2->max_part_no); - for (key2=key2->first(); key2; ) + for (key2=key2->first(); ; ) { /* key1 consists of one or more ranges. tmp is the range currently @@ -10284,6 +10303,16 @@ key_or(RANGE_OPT_PARAM *param, SEL_ARG *key1,SEL_ARG *key2) ^ tmp */ + if (key1->min_flag & NO_MIN_RANGE && + key1->max_flag & NO_MAX_RANGE) + { + if (key1->maybe_flag) + return new SEL_ARG(SEL_ARG::MAYBE_KEY); + return 0; // Always true OR + } + if (!key2) + break; + SEL_ARG *tmp=key1->find_range(key2); /* @@ -10354,6 +10383,13 @@ key_or(RANGE_OPT_PARAM *param, SEL_ARG *key1,SEL_ARG *key2) key2->copy_min(tmp); if (!(key1=key1->tree_delete(tmp))) { // Only one key in tree + if (key2->min_flag & NO_MIN_RANGE && + key2->max_flag & NO_MAX_RANGE) + { + if (key2->maybe_flag) + return new SEL_ARG(SEL_ARG::MAYBE_KEY); + return 0; // Always true OR + } key1=key2; key1->make_root(); key2=key2_next; @@ -11669,6 +11705,9 @@ static bool is_key_scan_ror(PARAM *param, uint keynr, uint8 nparts) table_key->user_defined_key_parts); uint pk_number; + if (param->table->file->ha_table_flags() & HA_NON_COMPARABLE_ROWID) + return false; + for (KEY_PART_INFO *kp= table_key->key_part; kp < key_part; kp++) { field_index_t fieldnr= (param->table->key_info[keynr]. |