Last part of fix for BUG#7998 "Replication should be more clever about when to replicate RELEASE_LOCK()" + fixes after merge

mysql-test/r/drop_temp_table.result:
  result update
mysql-test/r/mix_innodb_myisam_binlog.result:
  result update
mysql-test/r/rpl000001.result:
  result update
mysql-test/r/rpl_change_master.result:
  result update
mysql-test/r/rpl_deadlock.result:
  result update (merge)
mysql-test/t/rpl000001.test:
  can't rely on GET_LOCK() to do slave synchro (use table lock instead)
mysql-test/t/rpl_change_master.test:
  changing the test as we can't use GET_LOCK() for slave synchro
mysql-test/t/rpl_deadlock.test:
  update (merge) binlog positions
mysql-test/t/rpl_get_lock.test:
  comment

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/mysql-test/t/rpl_change_master.test b/mysql-test/t/rpl_change_master.test
index ddac966b073..23866447c98 100644
--- a/mysql-test/t/rpl_change_master.test
+++ b/mysql-test/t/rpl_change_master.test
@@ -1,16 +1,23 @@
+# Verify that after CHANGE MASTER, replication (I/O thread and SQL
+# thread) restart from where SQL thread left, not from where
+# I/O thread left (some old bug fixed in 4.0.17)
+
 source include/master-slave.inc;
 
-connection slave;
-select get_lock("a",5);
 connection master;
+# Make SQL slave thread advance a bit
 create table t1(n int);
-insert into t1 values(1+get_lock("a",15)*0);
+sync_slave_with_master;
+select * from t1;
+# Now stop it and make I/O slave thread be ahead
+stop slave sql_thread;
+connection master;
+insert into t1 values(1);
 insert into t1 values(2);
 save_master_pos;
 connection slave;
---real_sleep 3; # can't sync_with_master as we should be blocked
+--real_sleep 3; # wait for I/O thread to have read updates
 stop slave;
-select * from t1;
 --replace_result $MASTER_MYPORT MASTER_MYPORT
 --replace_column 1 # 8 # 9 # 23 # 33 #
 show slave status;
@@ -18,8 +25,6 @@ change master to master_user='root';
 --replace_result $MASTER_MYPORT MASTER_MYPORT
 --replace_column 1 # 8 # 9 # 23 # 33 #
 show slave status;
-# Will restart from after the values(2), which is bug
-select release_lock("a");
 start slave;
 sync_with_master;
 select * from t1;