1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
|
//===- unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/DataflowAnalysisContextTest.cpp ---===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/DataflowAnalysisContext.h"
#include "clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/WatchedLiteralsSolver.h"
#include "gmock/gmock.h"
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
#include <memory>
namespace {
using namespace clang;
using namespace dataflow;
class DataflowAnalysisContextTest : public ::testing::Test {
protected:
DataflowAnalysisContextTest()
: Context(std::make_unique<WatchedLiteralsSolver>()), A(Context.arena()) {
}
DataflowAnalysisContext Context;
Arena &A;
};
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, DistinctTopsNotEquivalent) {
auto &X = A.create<TopBoolValue>();
auto &Y = A.create<TopBoolValue>();
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(X, Y));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, EmptyFlowCondition) {
auto &FC = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
auto &C = A.create<AtomicBoolValue>();
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC, C));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, AddFlowConditionConstraint) {
auto &FC = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
auto &C = A.create<AtomicBoolValue>();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC, C);
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC, C));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, ForkFlowCondition) {
auto &FC1 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
auto &C1 = A.create<AtomicBoolValue>();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC1, C1);
// Forked flow condition inherits the constraints of its parent flow
// condition.
auto &FC2 = Context.forkFlowCondition(FC1);
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC2, C1));
// Adding a new constraint to the forked flow condition does not affect its
// parent flow condition.
auto &C2 = A.create<AtomicBoolValue>();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC2, C2);
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC2, C2));
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC1, C2));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, JoinFlowConditions) {
auto &C1 = A.create<AtomicBoolValue>();
auto &C2 = A.create<AtomicBoolValue>();
auto &C3 = A.create<AtomicBoolValue>();
auto &FC1 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC1, C1);
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC1, C3);
auto &FC2 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC2, C2);
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC2, C3);
auto &FC3 = Context.joinFlowConditions(FC1, FC2);
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC3, C1));
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC3, C2));
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC3, C3));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, FlowConditionTautologies) {
// Fresh flow condition with empty/no constraints is always true.
auto &FC1 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC1));
// Literal `true` is always true.
auto &FC2 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC2, A.makeLiteral(true));
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC2));
// Literal `false` is never true.
auto &FC3 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC3, A.makeLiteral(false));
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC3));
// We can't prove that an arbitrary bool A is always true...
auto &C1 = A.create<AtomicBoolValue>();
auto &FC4 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC4, C1);
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC4));
// ... but we can prove A || !A is true.
auto &FC5 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC5, A.makeOr(C1, A.makeNot(C1)));
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC5));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, EquivBoolVals) {
auto &X = A.create<AtomicBoolValue>();
auto &Y = A.create<AtomicBoolValue>();
auto &Z = A.create<AtomicBoolValue>();
auto &True = A.makeLiteral(true);
auto &False = A.makeLiteral(false);
// X == X
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(X, X));
// X != Y
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(X, Y));
// !X != X
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(A.makeNot(X), X));
// !(!X) = X
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(A.makeNot(A.makeNot(X)), X));
// (X || X) == X
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(A.makeOr(X, X), X));
// (X || Y) != X
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(A.makeOr(X, Y), X));
// (X || True) == True
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(A.makeOr(X, True), True));
// (X || False) == X
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(A.makeOr(X, False), X));
// (X && X) == X
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(A.makeAnd(X, X), X));
// (X && Y) != X
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(A.makeAnd(X, Y), X));
// (X && True) == X
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(A.makeAnd(X, True), X));
// (X && False) == False
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(A.makeAnd(X, False), False));
// (X || Y) == (Y || X)
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(A.makeOr(X, Y), A.makeOr(Y, X)));
// (X && Y) == (Y && X)
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(A.makeAnd(X, Y), A.makeAnd(Y, X)));
// ((X || Y) || Z) == (X || (Y || Z))
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(A.makeOr(A.makeOr(X, Y), Z),
A.makeOr(X, A.makeOr(Y, Z))));
// ((X && Y) && Z) == (X && (Y && Z))
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentBoolValues(A.makeAnd(A.makeAnd(X, Y), Z),
A.makeAnd(X, A.makeAnd(Y, Z))));
}
} // namespace
|
