diff options
| author | Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> | 2022-07-29 11:38:52 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> | 2022-07-30 14:01:30 -0400 |
| commit | 10bde81c74863472047f31304064018c40f488ee (patch) | |
| tree | be691aa0de645373dda1d095010aef85e183f12f /Documentation/trace | |
| parent | 8812d21219b9c649dd25eb93915e00939944aeb7 (diff) | |
| download | linux-10bde81c74863472047f31304064018c40f488ee.tar.gz | |
rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor
The wakeup in preemptive (wip) monitor verifies if the
wakeup events always take place with preemption disabled:
|
|
v
#==================#
H preemptive H <+
#==================# |
| |
| preempt_disable | preempt_enable
v |
sched_waking +------------------+ |
+--------------- | | |
| | non_preemptive | |
+--------------> | | -+
+------------------+
The wakeup event always takes place with preemption disabled because
of the scheduler synchronization. However, because the preempt_count
and its trace event are not atomic with regard to interrupts, some
inconsistencies might happen.
The documentation illustrates one of these cases.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c98ca678df81115fddc04921b3c79720c836b18f.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/trace')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_wip.rst | 55 |
2 files changed, 56 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst b/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst index db2ae3f90b90..4cb71ed628b8 100644 --- a/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst @@ -10,3 +10,4 @@ Runtime Verification deterministic_automata.rst da_monitor_synthesis.rst da_monitor_instrumentation.rst + monitor_wip.rst diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_wip.rst b/Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_wip.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a95763438c48 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_wip.rst @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +Monitor wip +=========== + +- Name: wip - wakeup in preemptive +- Type: per-cpu deterministic automaton +- Author: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> + +Description +----------- + +The wakeup in preemptive (wip) monitor is a sample per-cpu monitor +that verifies if the wakeup events always take place with +preemption disabled:: + + | + | + v + #==================# + H preemptive H <+ + #==================# | + | | + | preempt_disable | preempt_enable + v | + sched_waking +------------------+ | + +--------------- | | | + | | non_preemptive | | + +--------------> | | -+ + +------------------+ + +The wakeup event always takes place with preemption disabled because +of the scheduler synchronization. However, because the preempt_count +and its trace event are not atomic with regard to interrupts, some +inconsistencies might happen. For example:: + + preempt_disable() { + __preempt_count_add(1) + -------> smp_apic_timer_interrupt() { + preempt_disable() + do not trace (preempt count >= 1) + + wake up a thread + + preempt_enable() + do not trace (preempt count >= 1) + } + <------ + trace_preempt_disable(); + } + +This problem was reported and discussed here: + https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1559051152.git.bristot@redhat.com/ + +Specification +------------- +Grapviz Dot file in tools/verification/models/wip.dot |