| Commit message (Expand) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
* | Revoking my proposal [busec] from consideration. | wrowe | 2002-07-15 | 1 | -125/+2 |
* | *** empty log message *** | brane | 2002-07-15 | 1 | -4/+5 |
* | I don't like the half point votes one bit, but since others are using them | striker | 2002-07-14 | 1 | -5/+5 |
* | My new view | jwoolley | 2002-07-14 | 1 | -5/+5 |
* | Cast a vote, though I have on purpose avoiding chiming in during | jim | 2002-07-13 | 1 | -3/+4 |
* | bugger | fielding | 2002-07-13 | 1 | -2/+2 |
* | more votes | fielding | 2002-07-13 | 1 | -5/+6 |
* | Thanks brian... add my vote, and move fielding's to make it absolutely | wrowe | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -4/+5 |
* | Updated votes on time types | brianp | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -2/+5 |
* | Refine my suggested names for both alternatives. | wrowe | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -3/+4 |
* | I've since been swayed more toward the middle of this debate. I'm of | jwoolley | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -4/+2 |
* | Add my votes. | dreid | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -4/+4 |
* | Updated votes on apr_time_t renaming | brianp | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -3/+4 |
* | whee, better than a vote | fielding | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -8/+12 |
* | Reformat all votes of the same number with no explanations on the same line | jerenkrantz | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -5/+2 |
* | Revisit my position, and comments on-point. Off-topic comments to list. | wrowe | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -6/+10 |
* | add my 2c's | ianh | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -3/+5 |
* | updated my votes on apr_table_t, added some explanatory notes | brianp | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -2/+13 |
* | Revert the other significant response to trolling, it didn't belong in | wrowe | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -8/+2 |
* | more junk | fielding | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -1/+25 |
* | IMHO, apr_time_t should be treated as an opaque value. The library should be | jerenkrantz | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -2/+2 |
* | Grmbl, grmbl, 8 spaces -> tab... squash it. | striker | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -2/+2 |
* | Yet another vote... | striker | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -1/+2 |
* | Fix my misconception, and retract an otherwise combative answer to | wrowe | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -6/+3 |
* | Split opinion, commentary and aspecific complaints from the statements | wrowe | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -22/+46 |
* | Comments on the time_t discussion | brianp | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -1/+7 |
* | wake up | fielding | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -3/+35 |
* | This seems to be a fairly moot issue at this point. | jwoolley | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -50/+1 |
* | MHO | jwoolley | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -1/+7 |
* | noone liked apr_butime_t so eliminate that part of the debate. | wrowe | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -10/+3 |
* | Drop in my votes on this issue. | striker | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -3/+3 |
* | These two questions aren't orthogonal, so the votes don't all make sense. | aaron | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -2/+4 |
* | Votes passing in the night | jerenkrantz | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -3/+3 |
* | Added vote on apr_time_t naming | brianp | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -1/+8 |
* | FirstBill says longlong integer divisions are near gone. Change the | wrowe | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -13/+13 |
* | Add my vote | thommay | 2002-06-28 | 1 | -3/+3 |
* | Casting... | jim | 2002-06-28 | 1 | -3/+3 |
* | My votes | rbb | 2002-06-28 | 1 | -4/+4 |
* | *** empty log message *** | brane | 2002-06-28 | 1 | -4/+4 |
* | mho | jwoolley | 2002-06-28 | 1 | -4/+7 |
* | Added a call for votes on how to address the apr_time_t 64-bit division | brianp | 2002-06-28 | 1 | -1/+11 |
* | "I can see down your shirt!" | gstein | 2002-05-31 | 1 | -1/+8 |
* | Both of these issues have been taken care of. The old locks are gone | aaron | 2002-05-24 | 1 | -8/+1 |
* | I *think* "polymorphically" is a word... | brianp | 2002-05-07 | 1 | -1/+6 |
* | Convert apr_pcalloc to a macro to take advantage of compiler | brianp | 2002-05-05 | 1 | -7/+1 |
* | Don't throw the baby out with the bath water... | stoddard | 2002-05-03 | 1 | -4/+5 |
* | add my vote about atomics. | gregames | 2002-05-02 | 1 | -2/+2 |
* | Small reformatting to make the votes easier to see (hopefully). Also | rbb | 2002-05-02 | 1 | -4/+5 |
* | Missed the most important point of | jim | 2002-05-02 | 1 | -2/+3 |
* | Cast me vote on atomics... back from | jim | 2002-05-02 | 1 | -1/+8 |