summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/STATUS
Commit message (Expand)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Note Releasewrowe2005-10-281-1/+1
* Bump after tagwrowe2005-09-261-0/+1
* Bump for 0.9.7 tagwrowe2005-09-261-1/+3
* property cleanupnd2004-11-241-1/+1
* Record 0.9.[34] release dates.jorton2004-05-171-2/+4
* Donestoddard2003-06-261-3/+3
* give some credit where credit is duetrawick2003-04-101-2/+2
* update an entry on a solaris lock problem with informationtrawick2003-04-041-1/+22
* Noteswrowe2003-03-311-2/+3
* Prepare for 0.9.2 tagwrowe2003-03-221-2/+2
* Clean up status, noting the pending release, splitting showstopperswrowe2003-03-201-16/+9
* One fewer namespace collisions (effective with 1.0 of APR)wrowe2003-03-071-2/+1
* A few fewer undecorated nameswrowe2003-02-241-14/+7
* Removed some unnecessary #defines from apr.hnwbnicholes2003-01-271-4/+2
* proc_mutex support on NetWarebnicholes2003-01-231-1/+4
* Meant to do this earlier today.wrowe2003-01-231-1/+21
* I'm content to remove this showstopper now that we have the versioning bitsjerenkrantz2003-01-221-17/+1
* It was raining, now it's sunny. :-)rbb2002-12-101-1/+8
* Invite others to the party.wrowe2002-12-101-1/+5
* Comment on renames status.thommay2002-11-201-1/+4
* More work?aaron2002-10-221-1/+4
* mention need to clean up protocol info for socket creationtrawick2002-10-181-2/+8
* Update revision history.jerenkrantz2002-09-131-2/+4
* "A dump truck... a *yellow* dump truck..."gstein2002-08-221-12/+24
* This vote seems to be pretty resolved.thommay2002-08-191-9/+8
* ENOSHOWSTOP: Not a showstopper.fitz2002-08-011-2/+2
* Add a vote.striker2002-08-011-2/+2
* Day? It is still night isn't it?jerenkrantz2002-07-311-2/+8
* Yet another horrendous day in London townthommay2002-07-311-7/+8
* Revoking my proposal [busec] from consideration.wrowe2002-07-151-125/+2
* *** empty log message ***brane2002-07-151-4/+5
* I don't like the half point votes one bit, but since others are using themstriker2002-07-141-5/+5
* My new viewjwoolley2002-07-141-5/+5
* Cast a vote, though I have on purpose avoiding chiming in duringjim2002-07-131-3/+4
* buggerfielding2002-07-131-2/+2
* more votesfielding2002-07-131-5/+6
* Thanks brian... add my vote, and move fielding's to make it absolutelywrowe2002-07-121-4/+5
* Updated votes on time typesbrianp2002-07-121-2/+5
* Refine my suggested names for both alternatives.wrowe2002-07-121-3/+4
* I've since been swayed more toward the middle of this debate. I'm ofjwoolley2002-07-121-4/+2
* Add my votes.dreid2002-07-121-4/+4
* Updated votes on apr_time_t renamingbrianp2002-07-121-3/+4
* whee, better than a votefielding2002-07-121-8/+12
* Reformat all votes of the same number with no explanations on the same linejerenkrantz2002-07-121-5/+2
* Revisit my position, and comments on-point. Off-topic comments to list.wrowe2002-07-121-6/+10
* add my 2c'sianh2002-07-121-3/+5
* updated my votes on apr_table_t, added some explanatory notesbrianp2002-07-121-2/+13
* Revert the other significant response to trolling, it didn't belong inwrowe2002-07-121-8/+2
* more junkfielding2002-07-121-1/+25
* IMHO, apr_time_t should be treated as an opaque value. The library should bejerenkrantz2002-07-121-2/+2