diff options
| author | Armin Ronacher <armin.ronacher@active-4.com> | 2008-04-26 23:21:03 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Armin Ronacher <armin.ronacher@active-4.com> | 2008-04-26 23:21:03 +0200 |
| commit | 32a910f041ef31a62dcff468ab1d6f3d3f711266 (patch) | |
| tree | c128d7270321cd21ce3f6372ebc486693f69ed61 /examples | |
| parent | 5304229478b34fa7190f0cfa93cce13ed8a1273b (diff) | |
| download | jinja2-32a910f041ef31a62dcff468ab1d6f3d3f711266.tar.gz | |
added spitfire to bench and did some more refactoring
--HG--
branch : trunk
Diffstat (limited to 'examples')
| -rw-r--r-- | examples/bench.py | 64 |
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/examples/bench.py b/examples/bench.py index 287f831..15830a0 100644 --- a/examples/bench.py +++ b/examples/bench.py @@ -1,9 +1,10 @@ -""" +"""\ This benchmark compares some python templating engines with Jinja 2 so that we get a picture of how fast Jinja 2 is for a semi real world - template. If a template engine is not installed the test is skipped. + template. If a template engine is not installed the test is skipped.\ """ import sys +import cgi from timeit import Timer from jinja2 import Environment as JinjaEnvironment @@ -247,20 +248,67 @@ else: from tenjin.helpers import escape, to_str tenjin_template.render(context, locals()) +try: + from spitfire.compiler import util as SpitfireTemplate + from spitfire.compiler.analyzer import o2_options as spitfire_optimizer +except ImportError: + test_spitfire = None +else: + spitfire_template = SpitfireTemplate.load_template("""\ +<!doctype html> +<html> + <head> + <title>$cgi.escape($page_title)</title> + </head> + <body> + <div class="header"> + <h1>$cgi.escape($page_title)</h1> + </div> + <ul class="navigation"> + #for $href, $caption in [('index.html', 'Index'), ('downloads.html', 'Downloads'), ('products.html', 'Products')] + <li><a href="$cgi.escape($href)">$cgi.escape($caption)</a></li> + #end for + </ul> + <div class="table"> + <table> + #for $row in $table + <tr> + #for $cell in $row + <td>$cell</td> + #end for + </tr> + #end for + </table> + </div> + </body> +</html>\ +""", 'spitfire_tmpl', spitfire_optimizer, {'enable_filters': False}) + spitfire_context = dict(context, **{'cgi': cgi}) + + def test_spitfire(): + spitfire_template(search_list=[spitfire_context]).main() + sys.stdout.write('\r' + '\n'.join(( '=' * 80, 'Template Engine BigTable Benchmark'.center(80), - '-' * 80, + '=' * 80, __doc__, '-' * 80 )) + '\n') -for test in 'jinja', 'tenjin', 'mako', 'django', 'genshi', 'cheetah': +for test in 'jinja', 'tenjin', 'mako', 'spitfire', 'django', 'genshi', 'cheetah': if locals()['test_' + test] is None: - sys.stdout.write(' %-20s*not installed*\n' % test) + sys.stdout.write(' %-20s*not installed*\n' % test) continue t = Timer(setup='from __main__ import test_%s as bench' % test, stmt='bench()') - sys.stdout.write('> %-20s<running>' % test) + sys.stdout.write(' >> %-20s<running>' % test) sys.stdout.flush() - sys.stdout.write('\r %-20s%.4f ms\n' % (test, t.timeit(number=20) / 20)) -sys.stdout.write('=' * 80 + '\n') + sys.stdout.write('\r %-20s%.4f seconds\n' % (test, t.timeit(number=20) / 20)) +sys.stdout.write('-' * 80 + '\n') +sys.stdout.write('''\ + WARNING: The results of this benchmark are useless to compare the + performance of template engines and should not be taken seriously in any + way. It's testing the performance of simple loops and has no real-world + usefulnes. It only used to check if changes on the Jinja code affect + performance in a good or bad way and how it roughly compares to others. +''' + '=' * 80 + '\n') |