summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/compiler/codeGen/CgHeapery.lhs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSimon Marlow <simonmar@microsoft.com>2007-07-27 10:41:57 +0000
committerSimon Marlow <simonmar@microsoft.com>2007-07-27 10:41:57 +0000
commit6015a94f9108a502150565577b66c23650796639 (patch)
tree20d499d1a9644c2c98374d99f511a4a1c2cb7d1d /compiler/codeGen/CgHeapery.lhs
parent04d444716b2e5415fb8f13771e49f1192ef8c8f8 (diff)
downloadhaskell-6015a94f9108a502150565577b66c23650796639.tar.gz
Pointer Tagging
This patch implements pointer tagging as per our ICFP'07 paper "Faster laziness using dynamic pointer tagging". It improves performance by 10-15% for most workloads, including GHC itself. The original patches were by Alexey Rodriguez Yakushev <mrchebas@gmail.com>, with additions and improvements by me. I've re-recorded the development as a single patch. The basic idea is this: we use the low 2 bits of a pointer to a heap object (3 bits on a 64-bit architecture) to encode some information about the object pointed to. For a constructor, we encode the "tag" of the constructor (e.g. True vs. False), for a function closure its arity. This enables some decisions to be made without dereferencing the pointer, which speeds up some common operations. In particular it enables us to avoid costly indirect jumps in many cases. More information in the commentary: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Rts/HaskellExecution/PointerTagging
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/codeGen/CgHeapery.lhs')
-rw-r--r--compiler/codeGen/CgHeapery.lhs3
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/codeGen/CgHeapery.lhs b/compiler/codeGen/CgHeapery.lhs
index 3bba211aa1..b89452e1de 100644
--- a/compiler/codeGen/CgHeapery.lhs
+++ b/compiler/codeGen/CgHeapery.lhs
@@ -288,6 +288,9 @@ hpStkCheck cl_info is_fun reg_save_code code
= noStmts
| otherwise
= oneStmt (CmmAssign nodeReg (CmmLit (CmmLabel closure_lbl)))
+ -- Strictly speaking, we should tag node here. But if
+ -- node doesn't point to the closure, the code for the closure
+ -- cannot depend on the value of R1 anyway, so we're safe.
closure_lbl = closureLabelFromCI cl_info
full_save_code = node_asst `plusStmts` reg_save_code