| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix up the coverage testpoint TestIssue59563TruncatedCoverPkgAll
to avoid spurious failures due to racy behavior. Specifically,
we are only interested in verifying coverage for the larger
function of the two in the test package (the smaller one is only
there to trigger additional function registrations while the
test is finalizing the cov data).
Updates #59867.
Updates #59563.
Change-Id: Ibfbbcbf68e0ad7a4d9606cbcfc69d140375c7b87
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/492175
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch revises the way coverage counter data writing takes place
to avoid problems where useful counter data (for user-written functions)
is skipped in favor of counter data from stdlib functions that are
executed "late in the game", during the counter writing process itself.
Reading counter values from a running "--coverpkg=all" program is an
inherently racy operation; while the the code that scans the coverage
counter segment is reading values, the program is still executing,
potentially updating those values, and updates can include execution
of previously un-executed functions. The existing counter data writing
code was using a two-pass model (initial sweep over the counter
segment to count live functions, second sweep to actually write data),
and wasn't properly accounting for the fact that the second pass could
see more functions than the first.
In the bug in question, the first pass discovered an initial set of
1240 functions, but by the time the second pass kicked in, several
additional new functions were also live. The second pass scanned the
counter segment again to write out exactly 1240 functions, but since
some of the counters for the newly executed functions were earlier in
the segment (due to linker layout quirks) than the user's selected
function, the sweep terminated before writing out counters for the
function of interest.
The fix rewrites the counter data file encoder to make a single sweep
over the counter segment instead of using a two-pass scheme.
Fixes #59563.
Change-Id: I5e908e226bb224adb90a2fb783013e52deb341da
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/484535
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The existing runtime/coverage API set includes a "ClearCounters()"
function that zeros out the counter values in a running process so as
enable capturing of a coverage profile from a specific execution time
segment. Calling this function is only permitted if the program is
built with "-covermode=atomic", due (in part) to concerns about
processors with relaxed memory models in which normal stores can be
reordered.
In the bug in question, a test that stresses a different set of
counter-related APIs was hitting an invalid counter segment when
running on a machine (ppc64) which does indeed have a relaxed memory
consistency model.
From a post-mortem examination of the counter array for the harness
from the ppc64 test run, it was clear that the thread reading values
from the counter array was seeing the sort of inconsistency that could
result from stores being reordered (specifically the prolog
"packageID" and "number-of-counters" stores).
To preclude the possibility of future similar problems, this patch
extends the "atomic mode only" restriction from ClearCounters to the
other APIs that deal with counters (WriteCounters, WriteCountersDir).
Fixes #56197.
Change-Id: Idb85d67a84d69ead508e0902ab46ab4dc82af466
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/463695
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix a buglet in cmd/cover in how we handle package name/path for the
"go build -o foo.exe *.go" and "go run *.go" cases.
The go command assigns a dummy import path of "command-line-arguments"
to the main package built in these cases; rather than expose this
dummy to the user in coverage reports, the cover tool had a special
case hack intended to rewrite such package paths to "main". The hack
was too general, however, and was rewriting the import path of all
packages with (p.name == "main") to an import path of "main". The hack
also produced unexpected results for cases such as
go test -cover foo.go foo_test.go
This patch removes the hack entirely, leaving the package path for
such cases as "command-line-arguments".
Fixes #57169.
Change-Id: Ib6071db5e3485da3b8c26e16ef57f6fa1712402c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/456237
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add more skips if short mode testing, since some of these tests
still seem to be timing out on smaller and more underpowered
builders.
Updates #56197.
Change-Id: I469d9fd3a6be5602243234562fa3fe6263968b56
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/443376
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch fixes up a bug in the inliner's special case code for
coverage counter updates, which was not properly working for
-covermode=atomic compilations.
Updates #56044.
Change-Id: I9e309312b123121c3df02862623bdbab1f6c6a4b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/441858
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Read counters using atomic ops so as to avoid problems with the race
detector if a goroutine happens to still be executing at the end of a
test run when we're writing out counter data. In theory we could guard
the atomic use on the counter mode, but it's better just to do it in
all cases, leaves us with a simpler implementation.
Fixes #56006.
Change-Id: I81c2234b5a1c3b00cff6c77daf2c2315451b7f6c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/438256
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
|
|
|
Add hooks/apis to support writing of coverage counter data and
meta-data under user control (from within an executing "-cover"
binary), so as to provide a way to obtain coverage data from programs
that do not terminate. This patch also adds a hook for clearing the
coverage counter data for a running program, something that can be
helpful when the intent is to capture coverage info from a specific
window of program execution.
Updates #51430.
Change-Id: I34ee6cee52e5597fa3698b8b04f1b34a2a2a418f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/401236
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
|
