| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
ApplicationSetting.current where applicable
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Delete remote uploads
Closes #45425
See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab-ce!18698
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This could only be possible for users that can create merge requests
within a project.
So they need to be a allowed to create a branch and create a merge request.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Repository archives are always named `<project>-<ref>-<sha>` even if
the ref is a commit. A consequence of always including the sha even
for tags is that packaging a release is more difficult because both
the ref and sha must be known by the packager.
- add append_sha option (defaults true) to provide a method for
toggling this feature.
Support added to GitLab Workhorse by gitlab-org/gitlab-workhorse!232
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Bring Object Storage to CE
Closes #4171, #4163, #3370, #2841, and #29203
See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab-ce!17358
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move it to Members::ApproveAccessRequestService.
Also, note that there was a double audit event log for access request
destruction.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
'security-10-4'
Restrict Todo API mark_as_done endpoint to the user's todos only
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This ensures that we have more visibility in the number of SQL queries
that are executed in web requests. The current threshold is hardcoded to
100 as we will rarely (maybe once or twice) change it.
In production and development we use Sentry if enabled, in the test
environment we raise an error. This feature is also only enabled in
production/staging when running on GitLab.com as it's not very useful to
other users.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
endpoints
We can simplify the code quite a bit and improve performance by using
grape-entity merge fields:
https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape-entity/tree/v0.6.0#merge-fields
Relates to #42030
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Search query is especially slow if a user searches a generic string
which matches many records, in such case search can take tens of
seconds or time out. To speed up the search query, we search only for
first 1000 records, if there is >1000 matching records we just display
"1000+" instead of precise total count supposing that with such amount
the exact count is not so important for the user.
Because for issues even limited search was not fast enough, 2-phase
approach is used for issues: first we use simpler/faster query to get
all public issues, if this exceeds the limit, we just return the limit.
If the amount of matching results is lower than limit, we re-run more
complex search query (which includes also confidential issues).
Re-running the complex query should be fast enough in such case because the
amount of matching issues is lower than limit.
Because exact total_count is now limited, this patch also switches to
to "prev/next" pagination.
Related #40540
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'security-10-3'
[10.3] Migrate `can_push` column from `keys` to `deploy_keys_project`
See merge request gitlab/gitlabhq!2276
(cherry picked from commit f6ca52d31bac350a23938e0aebf717c767b4710c)
1f2bd3c0 Backport to 10.3
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'security-10-3-do-not-expose-passwords-or-tokens-in-service-integrations-api' into 'security-10-3'
Filter out sensitive fields from the project services API
See merge request gitlab/gitlabhq!2281
(cherry picked from commit 476f2576444632f2a9a61b4cead9c1077f2c81d7)
2bcbbda0 Filter out sensitive fields from the project services API
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The N+1 issue was caused by loading the job_artifacts_archive for each
job (build) individually. Including that in the builds
AssociationRelation fixed the issue.
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Remove soft removals related code
Closes #37447
See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab-ce!15789
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This removes all usage of soft removals except for the "pending delete"
system implemented for projects. This in turn simplifies all the query
plans of the models that used soft removals. Since we don't really use
soft removals for anything useful there's no point in keeping it around.
This _does_ mean that hard removals of issues (which only admins can do
if I'm not mistaken) can influence the "iid" values, but that code is
broken to begin with. More on this (and how to fix it) can be found in
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/31114.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/37447
|
