summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/sb600spi.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAnastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>2021-07-06 16:18:44 +1000
committerEdward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>2021-08-25 02:24:23 +0000
commita69c5196d20d136b1de120f0fa5ea1e06c3776da (patch)
treed7479140777b3f91c8a49cc7065e1269391b12b9 /sb600spi.c
parent9db8e12c169aa5a74154d9fb9993af8044afe39f (diff)
downloadflashrom-git-a69c5196d20d136b1de120f0fa5ea1e06c3776da.tar.gz
spi_master: Use new API to register shutdown function
This allows spi masters to register shutdown function in spi_master struct, which means there is no need to call register_shutdown in init function, since this call is now a part of register_spi_master. As a consequence of using new API, two things are happening here: 1) No resource leakage anymore in case register_shutdown() would fail, 2) Fixed propagation of register_spi_master() return values. Basic testing: when I comment out free(data) in linux_spi_shutdown, test fails with error ../linux_spi.c:235: note: block 0x55a4db276510 allocated here ERROR: linux_spi_init_and_shutdown_test_success leaked 1 block(s) Means, shutdown function is invoked. BUG=b:185191942 TEST= 1) builds and ninja test including CB:56911 2) On ARMv7 device flashrom -p linux_spi -V -> using linux_spi, chip found 3) On x86_64 AMD device flashrom -p internal -V -> this is actually using sb600spi, chip found Change-Id: Ib60300f9ddb295a255d5ef3f8da0e07064207140 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/56103 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'sb600spi.c')
-rw-r--r--sb600spi.c5
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/sb600spi.c b/sb600spi.c
index 5c654754..fe7920fb 100644
--- a/sb600spi.c
+++ b/sb600spi.c
@@ -589,6 +589,7 @@ static const struct spi_master spi_master_sb600 = {
.read = default_spi_read,
.write_256 = default_spi_write_256,
.write_aai = default_spi_write_aai,
+ .shutdown = sb600spi_shutdown,
};
static const struct spi_master spi_master_yangtze = {
@@ -599,6 +600,7 @@ static const struct spi_master spi_master_yangtze = {
.read = default_spi_read,
.write_256 = default_spi_write_256,
.write_aai = default_spi_write_aai,
+ .shutdown = sb600spi_shutdown,
};
static const struct spi_master spi_master_promontory = {
@@ -609,6 +611,7 @@ static const struct spi_master spi_master_promontory = {
.read = promontory_read_memmapped,
.write_256 = default_spi_write_256,
.write_aai = default_spi_write_aai,
+ .shutdown = sb600spi_shutdown,
};
int sb600_probe_spi(struct pci_dev *dev)
@@ -786,8 +789,6 @@ int sb600_probe_spi(struct pci_dev *dev)
data->flash = NULL;
data->spibar = sb600_spibar;
- register_shutdown(sb600spi_shutdown, data);
-
/* Starting with Yangtze the SPI controller got a different interface with a much bigger buffer. */
if (amd_gen < CHIPSET_YANGTZE)
register_spi_master(&spi_master_sb600, data);