diff options
| author | Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> | 2015-06-24 23:34:51 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> | 2015-06-24 23:34:51 +0200 |
| commit | f87a3d736f3200029c8bed3ab4dad50f9680be7a (patch) | |
| tree | 7db1fde8016a6f576d7cba006365f461aaee00d0 /docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA | |
| parent | bf5218c85eba8d13c6c40a8047b8018b4ff5f1ed (diff) | |
| parent | f44b803f1605edcfc4058b1a818c44552f0affec (diff) | |
| download | curl-http2-push.tar.gz | |
Merge branch 'master' into http2-pushhttp2-push
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA b/docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA index 71186a268..2d317fdb0 100644 --- a/docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA +++ b/docs/DISTRO-DILEMMA @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ The Better License, Original BSD, GPL or LGPL? In Debian land, there seems to be a common opinion that LGPL is "maximally compatible" with apps while Original BSD is not. Like this: - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01417.html + https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01417.html More SSL Libraries @@ -163,13 +163,13 @@ Distro Angle of this Problem Footnotes [1] = http://www.xfree86.org/3.3.6/COPYRIGHT2.html#6 - [2] = http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/bsd.html - [3] = http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html + [2] = https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html + [3] = https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html [4] = http://curl.haxx.se/docs/copyright.html - [5] = http://www.openssl.org/source/license.html - [6] = http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html end of section 3 - [7] = http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/lgpl.html - [8] = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSSL_exception + [5] = https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html + [6] = https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html end of section 3 + [7] = https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html + [8] = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSSL_exception Feedback/Updates provided by |