summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--Lib/test/test_bytes.py16
-rw-r--r--Misc/NEWS3
-rw-r--r--Objects/bytearrayobject.c8
3 files changed, 21 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_bytes.py b/Lib/test/test_bytes.py
index a075cdeb0e..7ff7f19ef4 100644
--- a/Lib/test/test_bytes.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_bytes.py
@@ -993,6 +993,22 @@ class ByteArrayTest(BaseBytesTest, unittest.TestCase):
b.extend(range(100, 110))
self.assertEqual(list(b), list(range(10, 110)))
+ def test_fifo_overrun(self):
+ # Test for issue #23985, a buffer overrun when implementing a FIFO
+ # Build Python in pydebug mode for best results.
+ b = bytearray(10)
+ b.pop() # Defeat expanding buffer off-by-one quirk
+ del b[:1] # Advance start pointer without reallocating
+ b += bytes(2) # Append exactly the number of deleted bytes
+ del b # Free memory buffer, allowing pydebug verification
+
+ def test_del_expand(self):
+ # Reducing the size should not expand the buffer (issue #23985)
+ b = bytearray(10)
+ size = sys.getsizeof(b)
+ del b[:1]
+ self.assertLessEqual(sys.getsizeof(b), size)
+
def test_extended_set_del_slice(self):
indices = (0, None, 1, 3, 19, 300, 1<<333, -1, -2, -31, -300)
for start in indices:
diff --git a/Misc/NEWS b/Misc/NEWS
index 3d8e3166a9..63e4329cba 100644
--- a/Misc/NEWS
+++ b/Misc/NEWS
@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ Release date: 2015-05-24
Core and Builtins
-----------------
+- Issue #23985: Fix a possible buffer overrun when deleting a slice from
+ the front of a bytearray and then appending some other bytes data.
+
- Issue #24102: Fixed exception type checking in standard error handlers.
- Issue #15027: The UTF-32 encoder is now 3x to 7x faster.
diff --git a/Objects/bytearrayobject.c b/Objects/bytearrayobject.c
index 14444a2e8e..b9477ca9f5 100644
--- a/Objects/bytearrayobject.c
+++ b/Objects/bytearrayobject.c
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ PyByteArray_Resize(PyObject *self, Py_ssize_t requested_size)
return -1;
}
- if (size + logical_offset + 1 < alloc) {
+ if (size + logical_offset + 1 <= alloc) {
/* Current buffer is large enough to host the requested size,
decide on a strategy. */
if (size < alloc / 2) {
@@ -331,11 +331,7 @@ bytearray_iconcat(PyByteArrayObject *self, PyObject *other)
PyBuffer_Release(&vo);
return PyErr_NoMemory();
}
- if (size < self->ob_alloc) {
- Py_SIZE(self) = size;
- PyByteArray_AS_STRING(self)[Py_SIZE(self)] = '\0'; /* Trailing null byte */
- }
- else if (PyByteArray_Resize((PyObject *)self, size) < 0) {
+ if (PyByteArray_Resize((PyObject *)self, size) < 0) {
PyBuffer_Release(&vo);
return NULL;
}