If we encounter a friend class template for which we cannot resolve

the nested-name-specifier (e.g., because it is dependent), do not
error even though we can't represent it in the AST at this point.

This is a horrible, horrible hack. The actual feature we still need to
implement (for C++98!) is covered by PR12292. However, we used to
silently accept this code, so when we recently started rejecting it we
caused some regressions (e.g., <rdar://problem/11147355>). This hack
brings us back to the passable-but-not-good state we had previously.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@153752 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/friend-template.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/friend-template.cpp
index 152df37d3d..9c95fa0151 100644
--- a/test/SemaTemplate/friend-template.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/friend-template.cpp
@@ -230,3 +230,16 @@ namespace PR10660 {
     template <> friend class B; // expected-error{{extraneous 'template<>' in declaration of class 'B'}}
   };
 }
+
+namespace rdar11147355 {
+  template <class T> 
+  struct A {
+    template <class U> class B;
+    template <class S> template <class U> friend class A<S>::B; 
+  };
+  
+  template <class S> template <class U> class A<S>::B {
+  }; 
+  
+  A<double>::B<double>  ab;
+}