Adjust type-trait evaluation to properly handle Using(Shadow)Decls

Since r274049, for an inheriting constructor declaration, the name of the using
declaration (and using shadow declaration comes from the using declaration) is
the name of a derived class, not the base class (line 8225-8232 of
lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL274049). Because of
this, name-based lookup performed inside Sema::LookupConstructors returns not
only CXXConstructorDecls but also Using(Shadow)Decls, which results assertion
failure reported in PR29087.

Patch by Taewook Oh, thanks!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23765

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@287999 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/cxx11-crashes.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/cxx11-crashes.cpp
index 97c959454c..7c455eecd5 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/cxx11-crashes.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/cxx11-crashes.cpp
@@ -91,3 +91,15 @@ void test(int some_number) {  // expected-note {{'some_number' declared here}}
   Foo(lambda);
 }
 }
+
+namespace pr29091 {
+  struct X{ X(const X &x); };
+  struct Y: X { using X::X; };
+  bool foo() { return __has_nothrow_constructor(Y); }
+  bool bar() { return __has_nothrow_copy(Y); }
+
+  struct A { template <typename T> A(); };
+  struct B : A { using A::A; };
+  bool baz() { return __has_nothrow_constructor(B); }
+  bool qux() { return __has_nothrow_copy(B); }
+}