cex: don't report the items

Showing the items (with the state numbers) is really something we
should restrict to the report.

* src/counterexample.c (counterexample_report_shift_reduce)
(counterexample_report_reduce_reduce): Don't show the pointed rules,
we will do that in the report.
* tests/counterexample.at: Adjust.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 50 deletions

diff --git a/tests/counterexample.at b/tests/counterexample.at
index 7d677cb8..12ec4e8b 100644
--- a/tests/counterexample.at
+++ b/tests/counterexample.at
@@ -46,8 +46,6 @@ y: A | A B;
 AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
 Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
-1:    3 a: A .
-1:    8 y: A . B
 Example              A • B C
 First derivation     s ::=[ a ::=[ A • ] x ::=[ B C ] ]
 Example              A • B C
@@ -78,8 +76,6 @@ bc: B bc C | B C;
 AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
 Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
-1:    7 a: A .
-1:    5 b: . B
 Example              A • B C
 First derivation     s ::=[ a ::=[ A • ] bc ::=[ B C ] ]
 Example              A • B C
@@ -111,16 +107,12 @@ xby: B | X xby Y;
 AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
 Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
-1:    4 x: . %empty
-1:    9 xby: . B
 Example              A • B y
 First derivation     s ::=[ ax ::=[ A x ::=[ • ] ] by ::=[ B y ] ]
 Example              A • B
 Second derivation    s ::=[ A xby ::=[ • B ] ]
 
 Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
-5:    4 x: . %empty
-5:    9 xby: . B
 First example        A X • B y $end
 First derivation     $accept ::=[ s ::=[ ax ::=[ A x ::=[ X x ::=[ • ] ] ] by ::=[ B y ] ] $end ]
 Second example       A X • B Y $end
@@ -152,8 +144,6 @@ bc: B C;
 AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
 Shift/reduce conflict on token C:
-2:    7 b: B .
-2:    9 bc: B . C
 First example        B • C D $end
 First derivation     $accept ::=[ g ::=[ x ::=[ b ::=[ B • ] cd ::=[ C D ] ] ] $end ]
 Second example       B • C $end
@@ -183,8 +173,6 @@ y: A A B;
 AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
 Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
-1:    5 x: A .
-1:    6 y: A . A B
 First example        A • A $end
 First derivation     $accept ::=[ s ::=[ s ::=[ t ::=[ x ::=[ A • ] ] ] t ::=[ x ::=[ A ] ] ] $end ]
 Second example       A • A B $end
@@ -218,16 +206,12 @@ y: Y;
 AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
 Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
-4:    3 r: b .
-4:    7 s: b . A xx y
 Example              b • A X X Y
 First derivation     a ::=[ r ::=[ b • ] t ::=[ A x ::=[ X ] xy ::=[ X Y ] ] ]
 Example              b • A X X Y
 Second derivation    a ::=[ s ::=[ b • xx ::=[ A X X ] y ::=[ Y ] ] ]
 
 Shift/reduce conflict on token X:
-10:    8 x: X .
-10:    9 xx: X . X
 First example        X • X xy
 First derivation     a ::=[ x ::=[ X • ] t ::=[ X xy ] ]
 Second example       A X • X
@@ -256,8 +240,6 @@ b : A | b;
 AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
 Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
-4:    1 a: A b .
-4:    3 b: b .
 Example              A b •
 First derivation     a ::=[ A b • ]
 Example              A b •
@@ -286,8 +268,6 @@ b: D;
 AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 2 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
 Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens A, C:
-2:    5 a: D .
-2:    6 b: D .
 First example        D • A $end
 First derivation     $accept ::=[ s ::=[ a ::=[ D • ] A ] $end ]
 Second example       B D • A $end
@@ -316,8 +296,6 @@ i: X | i J K;
 AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
 Shift/reduce conflict on token J:
-5:    2 a: H i .
-5:    4 i: i . J K
 time limit exceeded: XXX
 First example        H i • J $end
 First derivation     $accept ::=[ s ::=[ a ::=[ H i • ] J ] $end ]
@@ -351,8 +329,6 @@ b: A B C | A B D;
 AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
 Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
-4:    7 a: A .
-4:    8 b: A . B C
 Example              N A • B C
 First derivation     s ::=[ n ::=[ N a ::=[ A • ] B ] C ]
 Example              N A • B C
@@ -386,16 +362,12 @@ C : A c A;
 AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 4 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
 Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c:
-3:    3 A: B .
-3:    5 A: . %empty
 Example              B • b A A c A
 First derivation     S ::=[ B ::=[ A ::=[ B • ] b A ] C ::=[ A c A ] ]
 Example              B • b A c A
 Second derivation    S ::=[ B C ::=[ A ::=[ B ::=[ A ::=[ • ] b A ] ] c A ] ]
 
 Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c:
-4:    4 A: C .
-4:    5 A: . %empty
 Example              C • c A A b A
 First derivation     S ::=[ C ::=[ A ::=[ C • ] c A ] B ::=[ A b A ] ]
 Example              C • c A b A
@@ -425,16 +397,12 @@ AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
 input.y: warning: 6 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
 Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
-0:    3 b: . %empty
-0:    4 c: . %empty
 First example        • c A A $end
 First derivation     $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ • ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] $end ]
 Second example       • c A A $end
 Second derivation    $accept ::=[ a ::=[ c ::=[ • ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] $end ]
 
 Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
-2:    3 b: . %empty
-2:    4 c: . %empty
 time limit exceeded: XXX
 First example        b • c A A $end
 First derivation     $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ • ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] ] ] $end ]
@@ -442,8 +410,6 @@ Second example       b • A $end
 Second derivation    $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ c ::=[ • ] A ] ] $end ]
 
 Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
-3:    3 b: . %empty
-3:    4 c: . %empty
 time limit exceeded: XXX
 First example        c • c A A $end
 First derivation     $accept ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ • ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] ] ] $end ]
@@ -451,8 +417,6 @@ Second example       c • A $end
 Second derivation    $accept ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ c ::=[ • ] A ] ] $end ]
 
 Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
-6:    3 b: . %empty
-6:    6 d: c . A
 time limit exceeded: XXX
 First example        b c • c A A $end
 First derivation     $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ • ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] ] ] ] ] $end ]
@@ -460,32 +424,24 @@ Second example       b c • A
 Second derivation    a ::=[ b d ::=[ c • A ] ]
 
 Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
-6:    3 b: . %empty
-6:    4 c: . %empty
 First example        b c • c A A $end
 First derivation     $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ • ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] ] ] ] ] $end ]
 Second example       b c • A $end
 Second derivation    $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ c ::=[ • ] A ] ] ] ] $end ]
 
 Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
-6:    4 c: . %empty
-6:    6 d: c . A
 First example        b c • A $end
 First derivation     $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ c ::=[ • ] A ] ] ] ] $end ]
 Second example       b c • A
 Second derivation    a ::=[ b d ::=[ c • A ] ]
 
 Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
-7:    1 a: b d .
-7:    7 d: d .
 Example              b d •
 First derivation     a ::=[ b d • ]
 Example              b d •
 Second derivation    a ::=[ b d ::=[ d • ] ]
 
 Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
-8:    2 a: c d .
-8:    7 d: d .
 Example              c d •
 First derivation     a ::=[ c d • ]
 Example              c d •
@@ -518,8 +474,6 @@ i: %empty | i J;
 AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
 Shift/reduce conflict on token J:
-7:    5 i: i J .
-7:    3 a: H i J . J
 Example              H i J • J J
 First derivation     s ::=[ a ::=[ H i ::=[ i J • ] J J ] ]
 Example              H i J • J J
@@ -553,8 +507,6 @@ d: D;
 AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
 Shift/reduce conflict on token D:
-3:    5 c: . %empty
-3:    6 d: . D
 Example              A a • D
 First derivation     s ::=[ A a a ::=[ b ::=[ c ::=[ • ] ] ] d ::=[ D ] ]
 Example              A a • D
@@ -586,8 +538,6 @@ d: D;
 AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
 Shift/reduce conflict on token D:
-3:    5 c: . %empty
-3:    6 d: . D
 First example        A a • D E $end
 First derivation     $accept ::=[ s ::=[ A a a ::=[ b ::=[ c ::=[ • ] ] ] d ::=[ D ] E ] $end ]
 Second example       A a • D $end