blob: 3be1955d3b6c7efc1c3b57564e49627c909db6a3 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
|
# Copyright 2020-2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# Check for an issue in GDB where buildsym_compunit::record_line was
# removing duplicate line table entries, but skip_prologue_using_sal
# depends on these duplicates to spot the end of the prologue.
#
# When the de-duplication was added this regression was not spotted as
# it requires a particular combination of a (very) small function
# being inlined into an also very small outer function.
#
# See also gdb.dwarf/dw2-inline-small-func.exp for a version of this
# test that makes use of the Dejagnu DWARF compiler.
#
# This test simply compiles with optimization and checks that GDB can
# do something suitable with the compiled binary. Problems with this
# test are most likely to occur when GDB asks the target specific code
# to skip the prologue (gdbarch_skip_prologue). Some targets make use
# of skip_prologue_using_sal, which should be fine, however, some
# targets make a poor attempt to duplicate parts of
# skip_prologue_using_sal, these targets could easily fail this test.
# This is not (necessarily) a problem with this test, but could
# indicate a weakness with the target in question.
standard_testfile inline-small-func.c inline-small-func.h
if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${testfile} \
[list $srcfile] {debug optimize=-O1}] } {
return -1
}
if ![runto_main] {
return -1
}
# Delete all breakpoints so that the output of "info breakpoints"
# below will only contain a single breakpoint.
delete_breakpoints
# Place a breakpoint within the function in the header file.
set linenum [gdb_get_line_number "callee: body" $srcfile2]
gdb_breakpoint "${srcfile2}:${linenum}"
# Check that the breakpoint was placed where we expected. It should
# appear at the requested line. When the bug in GDB was present the
# breakpoint would be placed on one of the following lines instead.
gdb_test "info breakpoints" \
".* in callee at \[^\r\n\]+${srcfile2}:${linenum}\\y.*"
|
