1 files changed, 202 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/TODO b/gdb/testsuite/TODO
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..978991c77cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/TODO
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+The highest priority item is not on this list: Fix bugs in the
+existing testsuite, fix the GDB/compiler/shell/etc bugs which it
+detects (particularly when they are hard to XFAIL), make it run
+reliably without unexpected failures on the "standard" machines, etc.
+This list exists largely as "tests we can add when we are ready to
+risk destabilizing it again".
+
+There are some tests which are only run on some platforms because they
+have not been tested on more platforms.  Enable them and fix any
+problems.  A partial list: recurse.exp, watchpoint.exp
+(test_watchpoint_triggered_in_syscall, test_complex_watchpoint).
+
+Test printing of structures passed by value, for the 7th, 8th, and 9th
+arguments (PR 1714).  Test printing structure arguments of
+2,4,6,8,12,16,and 20 bytes.  Same for structure return of all those
+sizes ("return", "finish", and call function).
+
+Get crossload tests to use --enable-targets and reenable them.
+
+corefile.exp:
+Test ability to run program when there is a core target, then go
+back to the core file when the program exits.
+
+Test handling of floating point variables
+1.  float, double, or long double
+2.  in register or saved register or memory.  Also the case where a
+double is in two float registers and only one of them is saved.
+3.  print them or set them
+4.  (Alpha) integer (32 or 64 bit) in floating point register.
+
+Print registers--"p $r5", "p sizeof ($r5)".  Test that they print
+appropriately (integer registers in decimal, registers which always
+contain addresses (pc, probably sp and fp, maybe others) in hex,
+floating point).
+
+Test completer.  Test that it completes a variety of things correctly
+(see the list of test cases in main.c in the gdb source).  Test TAB,
+M-?, and the "complete" command.
+
+Test "info line" with all kinds of linespecs.  Test that the last line
+of the file works right.
+
+weird.exp--test that unrecognized cross-reference types or
+unrecognized visibility or virtual characters get skipped properly
+(see stabs.texinfo).
+
+Test C++ nested types (especially if PR 1954 is fixed; even if not
+*some* things already should work even in the presence of nested
+types).  Test classes nested more than 9 levels deep (g++ mangles
+these differently) (both a demangle test and some tests which also
+test the compiler).  Test calling a method of a class nested more than
+9 levels (for gdb_mangle_name and demangling).
+
+Test static member functions (C++).  Test that "ptype" shows them
+correctly, both before and after they have been converted from stub
+methods.  Test that we can call them.
+
+Test printing complicated types, including functions, pointers to
+arrays of pointers of functions, functions which return pointers to
+functions, etc.
+
+printcmd.exp--test printing enum values.  Test printing an enum
+variable whose value is out of range.  Test "p (int)enum_var", "p/x
+enum_var".  Test that in something like "enum {FOO, LAST_THING=FOO}"
+we print FOO, not LAST_THING.
+
+Test GDB expressions--test all operators (and overloaded operators for
+C++).  Test integer constants which are signed or unsigned int, long,
+or long long.  Test detection of overflow of an integer constant.
+Here are a few integer constants to test (test they get the right
+types): 5, 5LL, 5LuL, 5L6u (invalid), 5LU.  Maybe things like
+0x12345678, 0x87654321, etc., but their types depend on sizes of int,
+long, etc.
+
+Test that printing const-qualified versions of various types works.
+In particular, on the sparc and probably other machines, "double" is
+handled differently from most types because it requires more alignment
+and thus goes in a different section (there is a gcc 2.4.5 bug with
+"const double" on sparc).
+
+Test that GDB's "source" command works and that things work if stdin
+is redirected (to a file or a pipe).  Test user defined command.  Run
+an inferior each of these ways (to test that inflow.c works).  Test
+that GDB works if the last line of stdin or a source'd file lacks a
+newline.
+
+Test that unmatched single quotes produce error messages, both in
+expressions and linespecs.
+
+Test "cd".  "foo/bar/.." should get simplified to "foo".  "/../.."
+should not get simplified (for Mach).  "/.." should not get simplified
+(for other networked OSes; POSIX.1 section B.2.3.7).  All these
+examples should continue to work with trailing slashes.
+
+Test scoping; here is a start
+ 1	int i=2;
+ 2	int j=3;
+ 3	main()
+ 4	{
+ 5	    int i;
+ 6	    for (i=600; i>0; i--)
+ 7		print_line(i);
+ 8	}
+ 9
+10	print_line(i)
+11	    int i;
+12	{
+13	    h();
+14	    printf("%d\n",i);
+15	}
+16
+17	h()
+18	{
+19	    printf("In h...");
+20	}
+Set a breakpoint in h, and print i, print_line::i, and main::i.  Set a
+breakpoint in main (or don't run the program), and test that
+print_line::i is an error.  But if i were static, "p main::i" should
+work even if the program is not being run.
+
+Write a test for the reentracy bug with rs6000_struct_return_address
+in rs6000-tdep.c.
+
+Test "return" from dummy frames.  Test "return" from non-innermost
+frame.  Test that "return" from a non-innermost frame restores
+registers which are saved not in that frame but in a frame more inner
+(I believe this currently works on few if any architectures).
+
+FORTRAN common blocks (a.out and xcoff--weird.exp has the start of
+one but it is not quite right as of 19 Nov 1993).
+
+Test that "x" command sets $_ and $__.  Test $_ in general.
+
+Test that "p/a" works when given addresses in text, data, and bss
+segments.  Test that it works if program is compiled with or without
+-g.  Test that it works if preceding symbol is static or if it is
+extern.
+
+Given `char abc[] = "abc\0def";' test "x/s abc" followed by "x/s"
+(should display "abc" followed by "def").  Test this works with no
+error message even if this is the last thing in the section (tests
+that val_print_string ignores an error if the error occurs after the
+'\0').
+
+Test ability to process NMAGIC a.out files.
+
+Test shared libraries:  "next" over printf, "step" into a function in
+a shared library which has line number info, breakpoint in a function
+in a shared library (either before or after the program is run and the
+shared libraries are loaded--also maybe write a test where the PLT
+will be in an unloaded state even though the shared library is loaded).
+
+If there are two breakpoints in the same place, and exactly one of
+them has its condition true, test that the correct breakpoint gets
+printed.
+
+Test "jump" including jump to a breakpoint (the latter will need an
+xfail for UDI and probably VxWorks (PR 1786 for vxworks; PR 2416
+contains some info for 29k).
+
+Set a watchpoint on a local variable (to be interesting, make a few
+calls, to be more interesting, make a recursive call).  Test that it
+gets disabled when leaving that scope.
+
+Test calling a function, hitting a breakpoint in the called function,
+calling another function, and hitting a breakpoint.  Test backtrace
+works in the presence of multiple dummy frames.  Test that "continue"
+will get you out of the inner called function, and "continue" again
+will get you back to where you were when you called the first one.
+
+Test special longjmp handling in wait_for_inferior (need to figure out
+in detail what the proper behavior in each case is).  Test longjmp to
+a place where there is a breakpoint (such that
+BPSTAT_WHAT_CLEAR_LONGJMP_RESUME_SINGLE happens).  In general, test
+interactions between longjmp and watchpoints, breakpoints, stepping,
+call function, etc.
+
+Test jumping right past a breakpoint (the case where wait_for_inferior
+passes not_a_breakpoint to bpstat_stop_status).  Might already be
+tested by some of the sun3 tests.  Probably want a .s test to avoid
+compiler dependencies.
+
+Test more obscure wait_for_inferior cases, expanding on the tests in
+watchpoint.exp, signals.exp, etc.
+
+Test stepping into functions which are one line long and functions
+which are on line 1 of the source file. (there is a class of bugs in
+which gdb doesn't find the line number information, and thus doesn't
+step into the function).
+
+Test that prologue recognition, backtrace, printing locals, etc.,
+still work in the presence of large frames (the point being that at
+some point immediate fields in RISC instructions will overflow and
+prologues will need to look different.  For sparc, the immediate field
+is 13 bits (signed), so I believe the threshold would be 4K bytes in a
+frame).
+
+
+(this is for editing this file with GNU emacs)
+Local Variables:
+mode: text
+End: