summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/PLANS/texi/drop-split-info-files.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'PLANS/texi/drop-split-info-files.txt')
-rw-r--r--PLANS/texi/drop-split-info-files.txt6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/PLANS/texi/drop-split-info-files.txt b/PLANS/texi/drop-split-info-files.txt
index a0a5636e7..f13a32419 100644
--- a/PLANS/texi/drop-split-info-files.txt
+++ b/PLANS/texi/drop-split-info-files.txt
@@ -2,12 +2,12 @@ For in Automake 2.0 (DONE)
--------------------------
We will drop split info files in Automake 2.0.
-See automake bug#13351: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/13351>.
+See automake bug#13351: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/13351>.
Basically, it has been confirmed that the original reason behind
the existence of split info files was indeed "efficiency,
especially memory size":
-<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/texinfo-devel/2012-08/msg00024.html>
+<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/texinfo-devel/2012-08/msg00024.html>
So split info files have lost their reason d'etre on modern systems
(where even Emacs has become a lightweight program ;-). And you are
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ not using an embedded system to read Info documentation, right?
In addition, it appears that the use of split info files (at least
the way Automake-generated rules have been handling them for a long
time) can cause real problems in some (admittedly quite corner-case)
-situations; see automake bug#12320: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/12320>.
+situations; see automake bug#12320: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/12320>.
This change should be completely transparent to the developer (no
adjustments needed to be made to Makefile.am or other parts of the