diff options
author | Lorry Tar Creator <lorry-tar-importer@lorry> | 2017-06-27 06:07:23 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Lorry Tar Creator <lorry-tar-importer@lorry> | 2017-06-27 06:07:23 +0000 |
commit | 1bf1084f2b10c3b47fd1a588d85d21ed0eb41d0c (patch) | |
tree | 46dcd36c86e7fbc6e5df36deb463b33e9967a6f7 /Source/JavaScriptCore/runtime/PureNaN.h | |
parent | 32761a6cee1d0dee366b885b7b9c777e67885688 (diff) | |
download | WebKitGtk-tarball-master.tar.gz |
webkitgtk-2.16.5HEADwebkitgtk-2.16.5master
Diffstat (limited to 'Source/JavaScriptCore/runtime/PureNaN.h')
-rw-r--r-- | Source/JavaScriptCore/runtime/PureNaN.h | 95 |
1 files changed, 95 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Source/JavaScriptCore/runtime/PureNaN.h b/Source/JavaScriptCore/runtime/PureNaN.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000..85adc0c06 --- /dev/null +++ b/Source/JavaScriptCore/runtime/PureNaN.h @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +/* + * Copyright (C) 2014 Apple Inc. All rights reserved. + * + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions + * are met: + * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. + * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the + * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. + * + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY APPLE INC. ``AS IS'' AND ANY + * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE + * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR + * PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL APPLE INC. OR + * CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, + * EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, + * PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR + * PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY + * OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT + * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE + * OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + */ + +#pragma once + +#include <wtf/Assertions.h> +#include <wtf/StdLibExtras.h> + +namespace JSC { + +// NaN (not-a-number) double values are central to how JavaScriptCore encodes JavaScript +// values (JSValues). All values, including integers and non-numeric values, are always +// encoded using the IEEE 754 binary double format. Non-double values are encoded using +// a NaN with the sign bit set. The 51-bit payload is then used for encoding the actual +// value - be it an integer or a pointer to an object, or something else. But we only +// make use of the low 49 bits and the top 15 bits being all set to 1 is the indicator +// that a value is not a double. Top 15 bits being set to 1 also indicate a signed +// signaling NaN with some additional NaN payload bits. +// +// Our use of NaN encoding means that we have to be careful with how we use NaNs for +// ordinary doubles. For example, it would be wrong to ever use a NaN that has the top +// 15 bits set, as that would look like a non-double value to JSC. +// +// We can trust that on all of the hardware/OS combinations that we care about, +// NaN-producing math operations never produce a NaN that looks like a tagged value. But +// if we're ever in a situation where we worry about it, we can use purifyNaN() to get a +// NaN that doesn't look like a tagged non-double value. The JavaScript language doesn't +// distinguish between different flavors of NaN and there is no way to detect what kind +// of NaN you have - hence so long as all double NaNs are purified then our tagging +// scheme remains sound. +// +// It's worth noting that there are cases, like sin(), that will almost produce a NaN +// that breaks us. sin(-inf) returns 0xfff8000000000000. This doesn't break us because +// not all of the top 15 bits are set. But it's very close. Hence our assumptions about +// NaN are just about the most aggressive assumptions we could possibly make without +// having to call purifyNaN() in surprising places. +// +// For naming purposes, we say that a NaN is "pure" if it is safe to tag, in the sense +// that doing so would result in a tagged value that would pass the "are you a double" +// test. We say that a NaN is "impure" if attempting to tag it would result in a value +// that would look like something other than a double. + +// Returns some kind of pure NaN. +inline double pureNaN() +{ + // Be sure that we return exactly the kind of NaN that is safe. We engineer the bits + // ourselves to ensure that it's !isImpureNaN(). FWIW, this is what + // numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN() returns on Mac/X86_64. But AFAICT there is + // no guarantee that quiet_NaN would return a pureNaN on all platforms. For example, + // the docs appear to imply that quiet_NaN could even return a double with the + // signaling bit set on hardware that doesn't do signaling. That would probably + // never happen, but it's healthy to be paranoid. + return bitwise_cast<double>(0x7ff8000000000000ll); +} + +#define PNaN (pureNaN()) + +inline bool isImpureNaN(double value) +{ + // Tests if the double value would break JSVALUE64 encoding, which is the most + // aggressive kind of encoding that we currently use. + return bitwise_cast<uint64_t>(value) >= 0xfffe000000000000llu; +} + +// If the given value is NaN then return a NaN that is known to be pure. +inline double purifyNaN(double value) +{ + if (value != value) + return PNaN; + return value; +} + +} // namespace JSC |