diff options
author | Lorry Tar Creator <lorry-tar-importer@lorry> | 2017-06-27 06:07:23 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Lorry Tar Creator <lorry-tar-importer@lorry> | 2017-06-27 06:07:23 +0000 |
commit | 1bf1084f2b10c3b47fd1a588d85d21ed0eb41d0c (patch) | |
tree | 46dcd36c86e7fbc6e5df36deb463b33e9967a6f7 /Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGStoreBarrierClusteringPhase.h | |
parent | 32761a6cee1d0dee366b885b7b9c777e67885688 (diff) | |
download | WebKitGtk-tarball-master.tar.gz |
webkitgtk-2.16.5HEADwebkitgtk-2.16.5master
Diffstat (limited to 'Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGStoreBarrierClusteringPhase.h')
-rw-r--r-- | Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGStoreBarrierClusteringPhase.h | 91 |
1 files changed, 91 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGStoreBarrierClusteringPhase.h b/Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGStoreBarrierClusteringPhase.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c1111b11b --- /dev/null +++ b/Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGStoreBarrierClusteringPhase.h @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +/* + * Copyright (C) 2016 Apple Inc. All rights reserved. + * + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions + * are met: + * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. + * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the + * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. + * + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY APPLE INC. AND ITS CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' + * AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, + * THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR + * PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL APPLE INC. OR ITS CONTRIBUTORS + * BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR + * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF + * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS + * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN + * CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) + * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF + * THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + */ + +#pragma once + +#if ENABLE(DFG_JIT) + +namespace JSC { namespace DFG { + +class Graph; + +// Picks up groups of barriers that could be executed in any order with respect to each other and +// places then at the earliest point in the program where the cluster would be correct. This phase +// makes only the first of the cluster be a FencedStoreBarrier while the rest are normal +// StoreBarriers. This phase also removes redundant barriers - for example, the cluster may end up +// with two or more barriers on the same object, in which case it is totally safe for us to drop +// one of them. The reason why this is sound hinges on the "earliest point where the cluster would +// be correct" property. For example, take this input: +// +// a: Call() +// b: PutByOffset(@o, @o, @x) +// c: FencedStoreBarrier(@o) +// d: PutByOffset(@o, @o, @y) +// e: FencedStoreBarrier(@o) +// f: PutByOffset(@p, @p, @z) +// g: FencedStoreBarrier(@p) +// h: GetByOffset(@q) +// i: Call() +// +// The cluster of barriers is @c, @e, and @g. All of the barriers are between two doesGC effects: +// the calls at @a and @i. Because there are no doesGC effects between @a and @i and there is no +// possible control flow entry into this sequence between @ and @i, we could could just execute all +// of the barriers just before @i in any order. The earliest point where the cluster would be +// correct is just after @f, since that's the last operation that needs a barrier. We use the +// earliest to reduce register pressure. When the barriers are clustered just after @f, we get: +// +// a: Call() +// b: PutByOffset(@o, @o, @x) +// d: PutByOffset(@o, @o, @y) +// f: PutByOffset(@p, @p, @z) +// c: FencedStoreBarrier(@o) +// e: FencedStoreBarrier(@o) +// g: FencedStoreBarrier(@p) +// h: GetByOffset(@q) +// i: Call() +// +// This phase does more. It takes advantage of the clustering to remove fences and remove redundant +// barriers. So this phase will output this: +// +// a: Call() +// b: PutByOffset(@o, @o, @x) +// d: PutByOffset(@o, @o, @y) +// f: PutByOffset(@p, @p, @z) +// c: FencedStoreBarrier(@o) +// g: StoreBarrier(@p) +// h: GetByOffset(@q) +// i: Call() +// +// This optimization improves both overall throughput and the throughput while the concurrent GC is +// running. In the former, we are simplifying instruction selection for all but the first fence. In +// the latter, we are reducing the cost of all but the first barrier. The first barrier will awlays +// take slow path when there is concurrent GC activity, since the slow path contains the fence. But +// all of the other barriers will only take slow path if they really need to remember the object. +bool performStoreBarrierClustering(Graph&); + +} } // namespace JSC::DFG + +#endif // ENABLE(DFG_JIT) + |