updated for version 7.4.289v7.4.289

Problem:    Pattern with repeated backreference does not match with new regexp
            engine. (Urtica Dioica)
Solution:   Also check the end of a submatch when deciding to put a state in
            the state list.

1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/regexp_nfa.c b/src/regexp_nfa.c
index 7cbfe0aee..d855df33b 100644
--- a/src/regexp_nfa.c
+++ b/src/regexp_nfa.c
@@ -3945,6 +3945,7 @@ copy_ze_off(to, from)
 
 /*
  * Return TRUE if "sub1" and "sub2" have the same start positions.
+ * When using back-references also check the end position.
  */
     static int
 sub_equal(sub1, sub2)
@@ -3976,6 +3977,23 @@ sub_equal(sub1, sub2)
 	    if (s1 != -1 && sub1->list.multi[i].start.col
 					     != sub2->list.multi[i].start.col)
 		return FALSE;
+
+	    if (nfa_has_backref)
+	    {
+		if (i < sub1->in_use)
+		    s1 = sub1->list.multi[i].end.lnum;
+		else
+		    s1 = -1;
+		if (i < sub2->in_use)
+		    s2 = sub2->list.multi[i].end.lnum;
+		else
+		    s2 = -1;
+		if (s1 != s2)
+		    return FALSE;
+		if (s1 != -1 && sub1->list.multi[i].end.col
+					       != sub2->list.multi[i].end.col)
+		return FALSE;
+	    }
 	}
     }
     else
@@ -3992,6 +4010,19 @@ sub_equal(sub1, sub2)
 		sp2 = NULL;
 	    if (sp1 != sp2)
 		return FALSE;
+	    if (nfa_has_backref)
+	    {
+		if (i < sub1->in_use)
+		    sp1 = sub1->list.line[i].end;
+		else
+		    sp1 = NULL;
+		if (i < sub2->in_use)
+		    sp2 = sub2->list.line[i].end;
+		else
+		    sp2 = NULL;
+		if (sp1 != sp2)
+		    return FALSE;
+	    }
 	}
     }