blob: 9e345e2a46a18d8d6e2c3069473d19c993a63329 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
/* SF Bug #445219, submitted by Krzysztof Kozminski
<kozminski@users.sf.net>.
Swig 1.3.6 gets confused by pure virtual destructors,
as in this file:
*/
%module(ruby_minherit="1") pure_virtual
%warnfilter(SWIGWARN_JAVA_MULTIPLE_INHERITANCE,
SWIGWARN_CSHARP_MULTIPLE_INHERITANCE,
SWIGWARN_D_MULTIPLE_INHERITANCE,
SWIGWARN_PHP_MULTIPLE_INHERITANCE) E; /* C#, D, Java, PHP multiple inheritance */
%nodefaultctor C;
%nodefaultdtor C;
%nodefaultctor E;
%nodefaultdtor E;
%inline %{
class A {
public:
A() { };
virtual ~A() = 0;
virtual void something() = 0;
virtual void method() = 0;
};
class B : public A {
public:
B() {};
virtual ~B() { };
virtual void something() { };
virtual void method() { };
};
/* class C is abstract because it doesn't define all methods in A */
class C : public A {
public:
virtual ~C() { };
virtual void method() { };
}
;
/* class D is not abstract, it defines everything */
class D : public C {
public:
virtual ~D() { };
virtual void something() { };
}
;
/* Another abstract class */
class AA {
public:
virtual ~AA() { }
virtual void method2() = 0;
};
/* Multiple inheritance between two abstract classes */
class E : public C, public AA {
public:
virtual void something() { };
};
%}
/* Fill in method from AA. This class should be constructable */
#if defined(SWIGCSHARP) || defined(SWIGD)
%ignore F::method2(); // Work around for lack of multiple inheritance support - base AA is ignored.
#endif
%inline %{
class F : public E {
public:
virtual void method2() { }
};
%}
%{
A::~A() {}
%}
|
