| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will contain a summary of the "most restrictive" share mode and
lease, i.e. intersection of all share_access entries and the union of
all access_mask and leases in the share mode array. This way
open_mode_check in the non-conflicting case will only have to look at
the summary and not walk the share mode array.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Why? Next commit will make share_mode_forall_leases() use
share_mode_forall_entries(), and that does not necessarily have to
depend on "share_mode_lock". And as we can pass the required
information via "private_data", don't embed the "share_mode_lock"
reference into this lowlevel library routine.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It does not have to depend on the whole struct share_mode_data.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have support for nested get_share_mode_lock calls, so we can avoid
this additional function.
It's one more talloc/free per close, but I hope this can't be
measurable. Our open/close path is pretty expensive anyway.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have already dereferenced fsp->lease
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes a kludgy implementation that worked around a locking
hierarchy problem: Setting a byte range lock had to contend the level2
oplocks, which are stored in locking.tdb/leases.tdb. We could not
access locking.tdb in the brlock.tdb code, as brlock.tdb might have
been locked first without locking.tdb, violating the locking hierarchy
locking.tdb->brlock.tdb. Now that that problem is gone (see the commit
wrapping do_lock() in share_mode_do_locked()), we can remove this
kludge.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Here we traverse the oplocks and leases when breaking read leases. We
find out here whether any of those are still left.
As it's the receivers of the messages that downgrade the database
entries, we might do that more than once. Possible future
optimization?
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Less lines of code, less .text bytes with -O3
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't need a share mode lock from a data dependency point of view
anymore, the leases data moved to leases.tdb. However, from a
coherency point of view it's probably wise to do this under a share
mode lock.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See the SMB_ASSERT a few lines above. Why this? It makes the next
commit more obvious.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The previous scheme was overloaded, a idl definition is easier to
print, and it clarifies what data is actually needed
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu May 16 23:48:18 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Centralize the marshalling code
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This also removes the temporary functions introduced during the patchset.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Apr 14 05:18:14 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-144
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove a reference to "struct share_mode_lease"
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove a reference to share_mode_data->leases[]
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Whenever we update the share_mode_lease struct, also update the leases.tdb
entry.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't need to memzero the struct when we can struct-initialize it a
bit later, implicitly initializing the rest to zero.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
lease_timeout_handler()"
This reverts commit 52f098d38da72d6eff3c4cac61487da897a8651c.
See the discussion in
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-December/131731.html
for the reasoning behind this revert.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
oplock_timeout_handler()"
This reverts commit e73eaa3c8004d3d8aff316cdb26b0bef85eceaca.
See the discussion in
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-December/131731.html
for the reasoning behind this revert.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
do_break_to_none()"
This reverts commit 1d5210b615035e46b90758ac7aa4ceec9174bee5.
See the discussion in
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-December/131731.html
for the reasoning behind this revert.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we have
[global]
smb2 leases = yes
kernel oplocks = no
[share]
kernel oplocks = yes
for clients requesting leases we don't even try to acquire kernel
oplocks, because the kernel API is not compatible. Kernel oplocks are
per fd, leases are roughly "per inode".
We don't however special-case the LEASE_OPLOCK case in
release_file_oplock, leading to nasty error messages like "bad file
descriptor" on the fcntl(fd,F_SETLEASE,F_UNLCK) call. They are
harmless, but they raise eyebrows.
To simplify the if-condition, I factored out the kernel call and
applied early returns.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Dec 18 02:00:44 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Coalesce the NT_STATUS_OPLOCK_BREAK_IN_PROGRESS case into just one
if-condition
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 2 22:22:37 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The next step will simplify the logic of the code.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To me, the "additive" SMB2_LEASE_WRITE|SMB2_LEASE_HANDLE is easier to
read than the negated ~SMB2_LEASE_READ.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As much as I dislike }else{ and prefer early returns, I even more
dislike asking for the same condition in two different ways.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Simple simplification: In locking/ we did not have the direct
reference to find_share_mode_lock.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This function is pretty closely entangled with its only caller. In
particular the NT_STATUS_OPLOCK_BREAK_IN_PROGRESS triggers acitivity
in the caller, and that's the only case where "*_l" is being set to
non-NULL. Prepare for cleanup
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ndr_open_files already includes open_files.h
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One if-condition is better than two
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Why? This makes it clearer to me that we're not interested in the actual
number of read oplocks. We only want to know if there are any read
oplocks at all.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This effectively reverts commit 17eba16b. It looks like these flags have
been introduced as part of the onefs support which has been removed
again. As there is no other use for the flags, remove them.
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Aug 25 03:23:05 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was only implemented by onefs in this way. If we get around to use
for example fanotify or something similar, we can either re-add them or
do it in a different way. For now, simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Aug 22 00:57:31 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|