summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/third_party/heimdal/doc/standardisation/draft-jaganathan-rc4-hmac-01.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'third_party/heimdal/doc/standardisation/draft-jaganathan-rc4-hmac-01.txt')
-rw-r--r--third_party/heimdal/doc/standardisation/draft-jaganathan-rc4-hmac-01.txt1177
1 files changed, 1177 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/third_party/heimdal/doc/standardisation/draft-jaganathan-rc4-hmac-01.txt b/third_party/heimdal/doc/standardisation/draft-jaganathan-rc4-hmac-01.txt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1550e35deec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/heimdal/doc/standardisation/draft-jaganathan-rc4-hmac-01.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,1177 @@
+
+
+
+Internet Engineering Task Force K. Jaganathan
+Internet-Draft L. Zhu
+Expires: January 19, 2006 J. Brezak
+ Microsoft Corporation
+ July 18, 2005
+
+
+ The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type
+ draft-jaganathan-rc4-hmac-01.txt
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+ By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
+ applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
+ have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
+ aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
+
+ Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
+ Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
+ other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
+ Drafts.
+
+ Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
+ and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
+ time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
+ material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
+
+ The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
+ http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
+
+ The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
+ http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
+
+ This Internet-Draft will expire on January 19, 2006.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
+
+Abstract
+
+ The Microsoft Windows 2000 implementation of Kerberos introduces a
+ new encryption type based on the RC4 encryption algorithm and using
+ an MD5 HMAC for checksum. This is offered as an alternative to using
+ the existing DES based encryption types.
+
+ The RC4-HMAC encryption types are used to ease upgrade of existing
+ Windows NT environments, provide strong crypto (128-bit key lengths),
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 1]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+ and provide exportable (meet United States government export
+ restriction requirements) encryption. This document describes the
+ implementation of those encryption types
+
+Table of Contents
+
+ 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
+ 2. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
+ 3. Key Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
+ 4. Basic Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
+ 5. Checksum Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
+ 6. Encryption Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
+ 7. Key Strength Negotiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
+ 8. GSSAPI Kerberos V5 Mechanism Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
+ 8.1 Mechanism Specific Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
+ 8.2 GSSAPI MIC Semantics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
+ 8.3 GSSAPI WRAP Semantics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
+ 9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
+ 10. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
+ Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
+ Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . 21
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 2]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ The Microsoft Windows 2000 implementation of Kerberos contains new
+ encryption and checksum types for two reasons: for export reasons
+ early in the development process, 56 bit DES encryption could not be
+ exported, and because upon upgrade from Windows NT 4.0 to Windows
+ 2000, accounts will not have the appropriate DES keying material to
+ do the standard DES encryption. Furthermore, 3DES is not available
+ for export, and there was a desire to use a single flavor of
+ encryption in the product for both US and international products.
+
+ As a result, there are two new encryption types and one new checksum
+ type introduced in Microsoft Windows 2000.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 3]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+2. Conventions Used in This Document
+
+ The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
+ "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
+ document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 4]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+3. Key Generation
+
+ On upgrade from existing Windows NT domains, the user accounts would
+ not have a DES based key available to enable the use of DES base
+ encryption types specified in RFC 4120. The key used for RC4-HMAC is
+ the same as the existing Windows NT key (NT Password Hash) for
+ compatibility reasons. Once the account password is changed, the DES
+ based keys are created and maintained. Once the DES keys are
+ available DES based encryption types can be used with Kerberos.
+
+ The RC4-HMAC String to key function is defined as follow:
+
+ String2Key(password)
+
+ K = MD4(UNICODE(password))
+
+ The RC4-HMAC keys are generated by using the Windows UNICODE version
+ of the password. Each Windows UNICODE character is encoded in
+ little-endian format of 2 octets each. Then performing an MD4
+ [RFC1320] hash operation on just the UNICODE characters of the
+ password (not including the terminating zero octets).
+
+ For an account with a password of "foo", this String2Key("foo") will
+ return:
+
+ 0xac, 0x8e, 0x65, 0x7f, 0x83, 0xdf, 0x82, 0xbe,
+ 0xea, 0x5d, 0x43, 0xbd, 0xaf, 0x78, 0x00, 0xcc
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 5]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+4. Basic Operations
+
+ The MD5 HMAC function is defined in [RFC2104]. It is used in this
+ encryption type for checksum operations. Refer to[RFC2104]for
+ details on its operation. In this document this function is referred
+ to as HMAC(Key, Data) returning the checksum using the specified key
+ on the data.
+
+ The basic MD5 hash operation is used in this encryption type and
+ defined in [RFC1321]. In this document this function is referred to
+ as MD5(Data) returning the checksum of the data.
+
+ RC4 is a stream cipher licensed by RSA Data Security . In this
+ document the function is referred to as RC4(Key, Data) returning the
+ encrypted data using the specified key on the data.
+
+ These encryption types use key derivation. With each message, the
+ message type (T) is used as a component of the keying material. This
+ table summarizes the different key derivation values used in the
+ various operations. Note that these differ from the key derivations
+ used in other Kerberos encryption types. T = the message type,
+ encoded as a little-endian four byte integer.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 6]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+ 1. AS-REQ PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP padata timestamp, encrypted with
+ the client key (T=1)
+ 2. AS-REP Ticket and TGS-REP Ticket (includes TGS session key
+ or application session key), encrypted with the service key
+ (T=2)
+ 3. AS-REP encrypted part (includes TGS session key or
+ application session key), encrypted with the client key (T=8)
+ 4. TGS-REQ KDC-REQ-BODY AuthorizationData, encrypted with the
+ TGS session key (T=4)
+ 5. TGS-REQ KDC-REQ-BODY AuthorizationData, encrypted with the
+ TGS authenticator subkey (T=5)
+ 6. TGS-REQ PA-TGS-REQ padata AP-REQ Authenticator cksum,
+ keyed with the TGS session key (T=6)
+ 7. TGS-REQ PA-TGS-REQ padata AP-REQ Authenticator (includes
+ TGS authenticator subkey), encrypted with the TGS session key
+ T=7)
+ 8. TGS-REP encrypted part (includes application session key),
+ encrypted with the TGS session key (T=8)
+ 9. TGS-REP encrypted part (includes application session key),
+ encrypted with the TGS authenticator subkey (T=8)
+ 10. AP-REQ Authenticator cksum, keyed with the application
+ session key (T=10)
+ 11. AP-REQ Authenticator (includes application authenticator
+ subkey), encrypted with the application session key (T=11)
+ 12. AP-REP encrypted part (includes application session
+ subkey), encrypted with the application session key (T=12)
+ 13. KRB-PRIV encrypted part, encrypted with a key chosen by
+ the application. Also for data encrypted with GSS Wrap (T=13)
+ 14. KRB-CRED encrypted part, encrypted with a key chosen by
+ the application (T=14)
+ 15. KRB-SAFE cksum, keyed with a key chosen by the
+ application. Also for data signed in GSS MIC (T=15)
+
+ Relative to RFC-4121 key uses:
+
+ T = 0 in the generation of sequence number for the MIC token
+ T = 0 in the generation of sequence number for the WRAP token
+ T = 0 in the generation of encrypted data for the WRAPPED token
+
+ All strings in this document are ASCII unless otherwise specified.
+ The lengths of ASCII encoded character strings include the trailing
+ terminator character (0). The concat(a,b,c,...) function will return
+ the logical concatenation (left to right) of the values of the
+ arguments. The nonce(n) function returns a pseudo-random number of
+ "n" octets.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 7]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+5. Checksum Types
+
+ There is one checksum type used in this encryption type. The
+ Kerberos constant for this type is:
+
+ #define KERB_CHECKSUM_HMAC_MD5 (-138)
+
+ The function is defined as follows:
+
+ K - is the Key
+ T - the message type, encoded as a little-endian four byte integer
+
+ CHKSUM(K, T, data)
+
+ Ksign = HMAC(K, "signaturekey") //includes zero octet at end
+ tmp = MD5(concat(T, data))
+ CHKSUM = HMAC(Ksign, tmp)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 8]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+6. Encryption Types
+
+ There are two encryption types used in these encryption types. The
+ Kerberos constants for these types are:
+
+ #define KERB_ETYPE_RC4_HMAC 23
+ #define KERB_ETYPE_RC4_HMAC_EXP 24
+
+ The basic encryption function is defined as follow:
+
+ T = the message type, encoded as a little-endian four byte integer.
+
+ OCTET L40[14] = "fortybits";
+ OCTET SK = "signaturekey";
+
+ The header field on the encrypted data in KDC messages is:
+
+ typedef struct _RC4_MDx_HEADER {
+ OCTET Checksum[16];
+ OCTET Confounder[8];
+ } RC4_MDx_HEADER, *PRC4_MDx_HEADER;
+
+
+ ENCRYPT (K, export, T, data)
+ {
+ struct EDATA {
+ struct HEADER {
+ OCTET Checksum[16];
+ OCTET Confounder[8];
+ } Header;
+ OCTET Data[0];
+ } edata;
+
+ if (export){
+ *((DWORD *)(L40+10)) = T;
+ HMAC (K, L40, 10 + 4, K1);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ HMAC (K, "&"T, 4, K1);
+ }
+ memcpy (K2, K1, 16);
+ if (export) memset (K1+7, 0xAB, 9);
+
+ nonce (edata.Confounder, 8);
+ memcpy (edata.Data, data);
+
+ edata.Checksum = HMAC (K2, edata);
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 9]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+ K3 = HMAC (K1, edata.Checksum);
+
+ RC4 (K3, edata.Confounder);
+ RC4 (K3, data.Data);
+ }
+
+ DECRYPT (K, export, T, edata)
+ {
+ // edata looks like
+ struct EDATA {
+ struct HEADER {
+ OCTET Checksum[16];
+ OCTET Confounder[8];
+ } Header;
+ OCTET Data[0];
+ } edata;
+
+ if (export){
+ *((DWORD *)(L40+10)) = T;
+ HMAC (K, L40, 14, K1);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ HMAC (K, "&"T, 4, K1);
+ }
+ memcpy (K2, K1, 16);
+ if (export) memset (K1+7, 0xAB, 9);
+
+ K3 = HMAC (K1, edata.Checksum);
+
+ RC4 (K3, edata.Confounder);
+ RC4 (K3, edata.Data);
+
+
+ // verify generated and received checksums
+ checksum = HMAC (K2, concat(edata.Confounder, edata.Data));
+ if (checksum != edata.Checksum)
+ printf("CHECKSUM ERROR !!!!!!\n");
+ }
+
+ The KDC message is encrypted using the ENCRYPT function not including
+ the Checksum in the RC4_MDx_HEADER.
+
+ The character constant "fortybits" evolved from the time when a 40-
+ bit key length was all that was exportable from the United States.
+ It is now used to recognize that the key length is of "exportable"
+ length. In this description, the key size is actually 56-bits.
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 10]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+7. Key Strength Negotiation
+
+ TA Kerberos client and server can negotiate over key length if they
+ are using mutual authentication. If the client is unable to perform
+ full strength encryption, it may propose a key in the "subkey" field
+ of the authenticator, using a weaker encryption type. The server
+ must then either return the same key or suggest its own key in the
+ subkey field of the AP reply message. The key used to encrypt data
+ is derived from the key returned by the server. If the client is
+ able to perform strong encryption but the server is not, it may
+ propose a subkey in the AP reply without first being sent a subkey in
+ the authenticator.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 11]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+8. GSSAPI Kerberos V5 Mechanism Type
+
+8.1 Mechanism Specific Changes
+
+ The GSSAPI per-message tokens also require new checksum and
+ encryption types. The GSS-API per-message tokens are adapted to
+ support these new encryption types . See [RFC4121] .
+
+ The only support quality of protection is:
+
+ #define GSS_KRB5_INTEG_C_QOP_DEFAULT 0x0
+
+ When using this RC4 based encryption type, the sequence number is
+ always sent in big-endian rather than little-endian order.
+
+ The Windows 2000 implementation also defines new GSSAPI flags in the
+ initial token passed when initializing a security context. These
+ flags are passed in the checksum field of the authenticator. See
+ [RFC4121] .
+
+ GSS_C_DCE_STYLE - This flag was added for use with Microsoft's
+ implementation of DCE RPC, which initially expected three legs of
+ authentication. Setting this flag causes an extra AP reply to be
+ sent from the client back to the server after receiving the serverAEs
+ AP reply. In addition, the context negotiation tokens do not have
+ GSSAPI per message tokens - they are raw AP messages that do not
+ include object identifiers.
+
+ #define GSS_C_DCE_STYLE 0x1000
+
+ GSS_C_IDENTIFY_FLAG - This flag allows the client to indicate to the
+ server that it should only allow the server application to identify
+ the client by name and ID, but not to impersonate the client.
+
+ #define GSS_C_IDENTIFY_FLAG 0x2000
+
+ GSS_C_EXTENDED_ERROR_FLAG - Setting this flag indicates that the
+ client wants to be informed of extended error information. In
+ particular, Windows 2000 status codes may be returned in the data
+ field of a Kerberos error message. This allows the client to
+ understand a server failure more precisely. In addition, the server
+ may return errors to the client that are normally handled at the
+ application layer in the server, in order to let the client try to
+ recover. After receiving an error message, the client may attempt to
+ resubmit an AP request.
+
+ #define GSS_C_EXTENDED_ERROR_FLAG 0x4000
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 12]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+ These flags are only used if a client is aware of these conventions
+ when using the SSPI on the Windows platform; they are not generally
+ used by default.
+
+ When NetBIOS addresses are used in the GSSAPI, they are identified by
+ the GSS_C_AF_NETBIOS value. This value is defined as:
+
+ #define GSS_C_AF_NETBIOS 0x14
+
+ NetBios addresses are 16-octet addresses typically composed of 1 to
+ 15 characters, trailing blank (ASCII char 20) filled, with a 16-th
+ octet of 0x0.
+
+8.2 GSSAPI MIC Semantics
+
+ The GSSAPI checksum type and algorithm is defined in Section 5. Only
+ the first 8 octets of the checksum are used. The resulting checksum
+ is stored in the SGN_CKSUM field . See [RFC4121] for GSS_GetMIC()
+ and GSS_Wrap(conf_flag=FALSE).
+
+ The GSS_GetMIC token has the following format:
+
+ Byte no Name Description
+ 0..1 TOK_ID Identification field.
+ Tokens emitted by GSS_GetMIC() contain
+ the hex value 01 01 in this field.
+ 2..3 SGN_ALG Integrity algorithm indicator.
+ 11 00 - HMAC
+ 4..7 Filler Contains ff ff ff ff
+ 8..15 SND_SEQ Sequence number field.
+ 6..23 SGN_CKSUM Checksum of "to-be-signed data",
+ calculated according to algorithm
+ specified in SGN_ALG field.
+
+ The MIC mechanism used for GSS MIC based messages is as follow:
+
+ GetMIC(Kss, direction, export, seq_num, data)
+ {
+ struct Token {
+ struct Header {
+ OCTET TOK_ID[2];
+ OCTET SGN_ALG[2];
+ OCTET Filler[4];
+ };
+ OCTET SND_SEQ[8];
+ OCTET SGN_CKSUM[8];
+ } Token;
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 13]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+ Token.TOK_ID = 01 01;
+ Token.SGN_SLG = 11 00;
+ Token.Filler = ff ff ff ff;
+
+ // Create the sequence number
+
+ if (direction == sender_is_initiator)
+ {
+ memset(Token.SEND_SEQ+4, 0xff, 4)
+ }
+ else if (direction == sender_is_acceptor)
+ {
+ memset(Token.SEND_SEQ+4, 0, 4)
+ }
+ Token.SEND_SEQ[0] = (seq_num "&" 0xff000000) >> 24;
+ Token.SEND_SEQ[1] = (seq_num "&" 0x00ff0000) >> 16;
+ Token.SEND_SEQ[2] = (seq_num "&" 0x0000ff00) >> 8;
+ Token.SEND_SEQ[3] = (seq_num "&" 0x000000ff);
+
+ // Derive signing key from session key
+
+ Ksign = HMAC(Kss, "signaturekey");
+ // length includes terminating null
+
+ // Generate checksum of message - SGN_CKSUM
+ // Key derivation salt = 15
+
+ Sgn_Cksum = MD5((int32)15, Token.Header, data);
+
+ // Save first 8 octets of HMAC Sgn_Cksum
+
+ Sgn_Cksum = HMAC(Ksign, Sgn_Cksum);
+ memcpy(Token.SGN_CKSUM, Sgn_Cksum, 8);
+
+ // Encrypt the sequence number
+
+ // Derive encryption key for the sequence number
+ // Key derivation salt = 0
+
+ if (exportable)
+ {
+ Kseq = HMAC(Kss, "fortybits", (int32)0);
+ // len includes terminating null
+ memset(Kseq+7, 0xab, 7)
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ Kseq = HMAC(Kss, (int32)0);
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 14]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+ }
+ Kseq = HMAC(Kseq, Token.SGN_CKSUM);
+
+ // Encrypt the sequence number
+
+ RC4(Kseq, Token.SND_SEQ);
+ }
+
+
+8.3 GSSAPI WRAP Semantics
+
+ There are two encryption keys for GSSAPI message tokens, one that is
+ 128 bits in strength, and one that is 56 bits in strength as defined
+ in Section 6.
+
+ All padding is rounded up to 1 byte. One byte is needed to say that
+ there is 1 byte of padding. The DES based mechanism type uses 8 byte
+ padding. See [RFC4121] .
+
+ The RC4-HMAC GSS_Wrap() token has the following format:
+
+
+ Byte no Name Description
+ 0..1 TOK_ID Identification field.
+ Tokens emitted by GSS_Wrap() contain
+ the hex value 02 01 in this field.
+ 2..3 SGN_ALG Checksum algorithm indicator.
+ 11 00 - HMAC
+ 4..5 SEAL_ALG ff ff - none
+ 00 00 - DES-CBC
+ 10 00 - RC4
+ 6..7 Filler Contains ff ff
+ 8..15 SND_SEQ Encrypted sequence number field.
+ 16..23 SGN_CKSUM Checksum of plaintext padded data,
+ calculated according to algorithm
+ specified in SGN_ALG field.
+ 24..31 Confounder Random confounder
+ 32..last Data encrypted or plaintext padded data
+
+ The encryption mechanism used for GSS wrap based messages is as
+ follow:
+
+
+ WRAP(Kss, encrypt, direction, export, seq_num, data)
+ {
+ struct Token { // 32 octets
+ struct Header {
+ OCTET TOK_ID[2];
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 15]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+ OCTET SGN_ALG[2];
+ OCTET SEAL_ALG[2];
+ OCTET Filler[2];
+ };
+ OCTET SND_SEQ[8];
+ OCTET SGN_CKSUM[8];
+ OCTET Confounder[8];
+ } Token;
+
+
+ Token.TOK_ID = 02 01;
+ Token.SGN_SLG = 11 00;
+ Token.SEAL_ALG = (no_encrypt)? ff ff : 10 00;
+ Token.Filler = ff ff;
+
+ // Create the sequence number
+
+ if (direction == sender_is_initiator)
+ {
+ memset("&"Token.SEND_SEQ[4], 0xff, 4)
+ }
+ else if (direction == sender_is_acceptor)
+ {
+ memset("&"Token.SEND_SEQ[4], 0, 4)
+ }
+ Token.SEND_SEQ[0] = (seq_num "&" 0xff000000) >> 24;
+ Token.SEND_SEQ[1] = (seq_num "&" 0x00ff0000) >> 16;
+ Token.SEND_SEQ[2] = (seq_num "&" 0x0000ff00) >> 8;
+ Token.SEND_SEQ[3] = (seq_num "&" 0x000000ff);
+
+ // Generate random confounder
+
+ nonce("&"Token.Confounder, 8);
+
+ // Derive signing key from session key
+
+ Ksign = HMAC(Kss, "signaturekey");
+
+ // Generate checksum of message -
+ // SGN_CKSUM + Token.Confounder
+ // Key derivation salt = 15
+
+ Sgn_Cksum = MD5((int32)15, Token.Header,
+ Token.Confounder);
+
+ // Derive encryption key for data
+ // Key derivation salt = 0
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 16]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+ for (i = 0; i "<" 16; i++) Klocal[i] = Kss[i] ^ 0xF0;
+ // XOR
+ if (exportable)
+ {
+ Kcrypt = HMAC(Klocal, "fortybits", (int32)0);
+ // len includes terminating null
+ memset(Kcrypt+7, 0xab, 7);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ Kcrypt = HMAC(Klocal, (int32)0);
+ }
+
+ // new encryption key salted with seq
+
+ Kcrypt = HMAC(Kcrypt, (int32)seq);
+
+ // Encrypt confounder (if encrypting)
+
+ if (encrypt)
+ RC4(Kcrypt, Token.Confounder);
+
+ // Sum the data buffer
+
+ Sgn_Cksum += MD5(data); // Append to checksum
+
+ // Encrypt the data (if encrypting)
+
+ if (encrypt)
+ RC4(Kcrypt, data);
+
+ // Save first 8 octets of HMAC Sgn_Cksum
+
+ Sgn_Cksum = HMAC(Ksign, Sgn_Cksum);
+ memcpy(Token.SGN_CKSUM, Sgn_Cksum, 8);
+
+ // Derive encryption key for the sequence number
+ // Key derivation salt = 0
+
+ if (exportable)
+ {
+ Kseq = HMAC(Kss, "fortybits", (int32)0);
+ // len includes terminating null
+ memset(Kseq+7, 0xab, 7)
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ Kseq = HMAC(Kss, (int32)0);
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 17]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+ }
+ Kseq = HMAC(Kseq, Token.SGN_CKSUM);
+
+ // Encrypt the sequence number
+
+ RC4(Kseq, Token.SND_SEQ);
+
+ // Encrypted message = Token + Data
+ }
+
+ The character constant "fortybits" evolved from the time when a 40-
+ bit key length was all that was exportable from the United States.
+ It is now used to recognize that the key length is of "exportable"
+ length. In this description, the key size is actually 56-bits.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 18]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+9. Security Considerations
+
+ Care must be taken in implementing this encryption type because it
+ uses a stream cipher. If a different IV isn't used in each direction
+ when using a session key, the encryption is weak. By using the
+ sequence number as an IV, this is avoided. The Windows
+ implementation of Kerberos uses a minimum RC4 key strength of 128
+ bits. A discussion of the security considerations when using HMACs
+ is present in [RFC2104] .
+
+10. Normative References
+
+ [RFC1320] Rivest, R., "The MD4 Message-Digest Algorithm", RFC 1320,
+ April 1992.
+
+ [RFC1321] Rivest, R., "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm", RFC 1321,
+ April 1992.
+
+ [RFC2104] Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., and R. Canetti, "HMAC: Keyed-
+ Hashing for Message Authentication", RFC 2104,
+ February 1997.
+
+ [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
+ Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
+
+ [RFC4120] Neuman, C., Yu, T., Hartman, S., and K. Raeburn, "The
+ Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5)", RFC 4120,
+ July 2005.
+
+ [RFC4121] Zhu, L., Jaganathan, K., and S. Hartman, "The Kerberos
+ Version 5 Generic Security Service Application Program
+ Interface (GSS-API) Mechanism: Version 2", RFC 4121,
+ July 2005.
+
+
+Authors' Addresses
+
+ Karthik Jaganathan
+ Microsoft Corporation
+ One Microsoft Way
+ Redmond, WA 98052
+ US
+
+ Email: karthikj@microsoft.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 19]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+ Larry Zhu
+ Microsoft Corporation
+ One Microsoft Way
+ Redmond, WA 98052
+ US
+
+ Email: lzhu@microsoft.com
+
+
+ John Brezak
+ Microsoft Corporation
+ One Microsoft Way
+ Redmond, WA 98052
+ US
+
+ Email: jbrezak@microsoft.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 20]
+
+Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
+
+
+Intellectual Property Statement
+
+ The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
+ Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
+ pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
+ this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
+ might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
+ made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
+ on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
+ found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
+
+ Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
+ assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
+ attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
+ such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
+ specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
+ http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
+
+ The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
+ copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
+ rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
+ this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
+ ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
+
+
+Disclaimer of Validity
+
+ This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
+ "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
+ OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
+ ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
+ INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
+ INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
+ WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+
+Copyright Statement
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject
+ to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
+ except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
+
+
+Acknowledgment
+
+ Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
+ Internet Society.
+
+
+
+
+Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 21]
+
+
View Lorry Controller Status