summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/python
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGarming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>2016-01-21 15:43:55 +1300
committerStefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>2016-03-10 06:52:24 +0100
commita988dc7b2de0ec9beb64b4c0b00794fb56bb6155 (patch)
treeba1cfc42035201ec631d5a950fca49599b9440f7 /python
parent2ad53d1c075b9ad0dae80deed4f6551f78e16c6d (diff)
downloadsamba-a988dc7b2de0ec9beb64b4c0b00794fb56bb6155.tar.gz
CVE-2016-0771: tests/dns: FORMERR can simply timeout against Windows
Two requests with identical parameters which are poorly formatted, can non-deterministically return FORMERR or simply fail to give a response. Setting the timeout to a number allows Windows to succeed. BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11128 BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11686 Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'python')
-rw-r--r--python/samba/tests/dns.py63
1 files changed, 53 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/python/samba/tests/dns.py b/python/samba/tests/dns.py
index 6aeff38dbb2..6cb2ae80476 100644
--- a/python/samba/tests/dns.py
+++ b/python/samba/tests/dns.py
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ from samba import credentials, param
from samba.tests import TestCase
from samba.dcerpc import dns, dnsp, dnsserver
+# This timeout only has relevance when testing against Windows
+# Format errors tend to return patchy responses, so a timeout is needed.
+timeout = None
def make_txt_record(records):
rdata_txt = dns.txt_record()
@@ -97,7 +100,8 @@ class DNSTest(TestCase):
"Helper to get dns domain"
return os.getenv('REALM', 'example.com').lower()
- def dns_transaction_udp(self, packet, host=os.getenv('SERVER_IP'), dump=False):
+ def dns_transaction_udp(self, packet, host=os.getenv('SERVER_IP'),
+ dump=False, timeout=timeout):
"send a DNS query and read the reply"
s = None
try:
@@ -105,6 +109,7 @@ class DNSTest(TestCase):
if dump:
print self.hexdump(send_packet)
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM, 0)
+ s.settimeout(timeout)
s.connect((host, 53))
s.send(send_packet, 0)
recv_packet = s.recv(2048, 0)
@@ -115,7 +120,8 @@ class DNSTest(TestCase):
if s is not None:
s.close()
- def dns_transaction_tcp(self, packet, host=os.getenv('SERVER_IP'), dump=False):
+ def dns_transaction_tcp(self, packet, host=os.getenv('SERVER_IP'),
+ dump=False, timeout=timeout):
"send a DNS query and read the reply"
s = None
try:
@@ -123,6 +129,7 @@ class DNSTest(TestCase):
if dump:
print self.hexdump(send_packet)
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM, 0)
+ s.settimeout(timeout)
s.connect((host, 53))
tcp_packet = struct.pack('!H', len(send_packet))
tcp_packet += send_packet
@@ -217,8 +224,15 @@ class TestSimpleQueries(DNSTest):
questions.append(q)
self.finish_name_packet(p, questions)
- response = self.dns_transaction_udp(p)
- self.assert_dns_rcode_equals(response, dns.DNS_RCODE_FORMERR)
+ try:
+ response = self.dns_transaction_udp(p)
+ self.assert_dns_rcode_equals(response, dns.DNS_RCODE_FORMERR)
+ except socket.timeout:
+ # Windows chooses not to respond to incorrectly formatted queries.
+ # Although this appears to be non-deterministic even for the same
+ # request twice, it also appears to be based on a how poorly the
+ # request is formatted.
+ pass
def test_qtype_all_query(self):
"create a QTYPE_ALL query"
@@ -256,8 +270,15 @@ class TestSimpleQueries(DNSTest):
questions.append(q)
self.finish_name_packet(p, questions)
- response = self.dns_transaction_udp(p)
- self.assert_dns_rcode_equals(response, dns.DNS_RCODE_NOTIMP)
+ try:
+ response = self.dns_transaction_udp(p)
+ self.assert_dns_rcode_equals(response, dns.DNS_RCODE_NOTIMP)
+ except socket.timeout:
+ # Windows chooses not to respond to incorrectly formatted queries.
+ # Although this appears to be non-deterministic even for the same
+ # request twice, it also appears to be based on a how poorly the
+ # request is formatted.
+ pass
def test_soa_hostname_query(self):
"create a SOA query for a hostname"
@@ -310,8 +331,15 @@ class TestDNSUpdates(DNSTest):
updates.append(u)
self.finish_name_packet(p, updates)
- response = self.dns_transaction_udp(p)
- self.assert_dns_rcode_equals(response, dns.DNS_RCODE_FORMERR)
+ try:
+ response = self.dns_transaction_udp(p)
+ self.assert_dns_rcode_equals(response, dns.DNS_RCODE_FORMERR)
+ except socket.timeout:
+ # Windows chooses not to respond to incorrectly formatted queries.
+ # Although this appears to be non-deterministic even for the same
+ # request twice, it also appears to be based on a how poorly the
+ # request is formatted.
+ pass
def test_update_wrong_qclass(self):
"create update with DNS_QCLASS_NONE"
@@ -349,8 +377,15 @@ class TestDNSUpdates(DNSTest):
p.ancount = len(prereqs)
p.answers = prereqs
- response = self.dns_transaction_udp(p)
- self.assert_dns_rcode_equals(response, dns.DNS_RCODE_FORMERR)
+ try:
+ response = self.dns_transaction_udp(p)
+ self.assert_dns_rcode_equals(response, dns.DNS_RCODE_FORMERR)
+ except socket.timeout:
+ # Windows chooses not to respond to incorrectly formatted queries.
+ # Although this appears to be non-deterministic even for the same
+ # request twice, it also appears to be based on a how poorly the
+ # request is formatted.
+ pass
# I'd love to test this one, but it segfaults. :)
# def test_update_prereq_with_non_null_length(self):
@@ -833,6 +868,7 @@ class TestInvalidQueries(DNSTest):
def test_one_a_reply(self):
"send a reply instead of a query"
+ global timeout
p = self.make_name_packet(dns.DNS_OPCODE_QUERY)
questions = []
@@ -848,6 +884,7 @@ class TestInvalidQueries(DNSTest):
try:
send_packet = ndr.ndr_pack(p)
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM, 0)
+ s.settimeout(timeout)
host=os.getenv('SERVER_IP')
s.connect((host, 53))
tcp_packet = struct.pack('!H', len(send_packet))
@@ -855,6 +892,12 @@ class TestInvalidQueries(DNSTest):
s.send(tcp_packet, 0)
recv_packet = s.recv(0xffff + 2, 0)
self.assertEquals(0, len(recv_packet))
+ except socket.timeout:
+ # Windows chooses not to respond to incorrectly formatted queries.
+ # Although this appears to be non-deterministic even for the same
+ # request twice, it also appears to be based on a how poorly the
+ # request is formatted.
+ pass
finally:
if s is not None:
s.close()