summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristopher R. Hertel <crh@samba.org>1998-10-27 21:07:52 +0000
committerChristopher R. Hertel <crh@samba.org>1998-10-27 21:07:52 +0000
commit26fcdfd082e84df675ad06c7ba8c0cdbf07eed98 (patch)
treeb852f1c81cde979dbb6d3c99f5635285dd9dedc7
parent695b31d0664f2c52704c49b49e56223b793dfc00 (diff)
downloadsamba-26fcdfd082e84df675ad06c7ba8c0cdbf07eed98.tar.gz
Added info about parsing debug messages.
Chris -)-----
-rw-r--r--source/parsing.doc238
1 files changed, 210 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/source/parsing.doc b/source/parsing.doc
index d024a22a515..d26a64ae4e8 100644
--- a/source/parsing.doc
+++ b/source/parsing.doc
@@ -150,32 +150,214 @@ About params.c:
are performed by params.c. Values are loaded via callbacks to
loadparm.c.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Samba DEBUG
+
+Chris Hertel, Samba Team
+July, 1998
+
+ Here's the scoop on the update to the DEBUG() system.
+
+ First, my goals are:
+ * Backward compatibility (ie., I don't want to break any Samba code
+ that already works).
+ * Debug output should be timestamped and easy to read (format-wise).
+ * Debug output should be parsable by software.
+ * There should be convenient tools for composing debug messages.
+
+ NOTE: the Debug functionality has been moved from util.c to the new
+ debug.c module.
+
+New Output Syntax
+
+ The syntax of a debugging log file is represented as:
+ <debugfile> :== { <debugmsg> }
+
+ <debugmsg> :== <debughdr> '\n' <debugtext>
+
+ <debughdr> :== '[' TIME ',' LEVEL ']' FILE ':' [FUNCTION] '(' LINE ')'
+
+ <debugtext> :== { <debugline> }
+
+ <debugline> :== TEXT '\n'
+
+ TEXT is a string of characters excluding the newline character.
+ LEVEL is the DEBUG level of the message (an integer in the range
+ 0..10).
+ TIME is a timestamp.
+ FILE is the name of the file from which the debug message was
+ generated.
+ FUNCTION is the function from which the debug message was generated.
+ LINE is the line number of the debug statement that generated the
+ message.
+
+ Basically, what that all means is:
+ * A debugging log file is made up of debug messages.
+ * Each debug message is made up of a header and text. The header is
+ separated from the text by a newline.
+ * The header begins with the timestamp and debug level of the
+ message enclosed in brackets. The filename, function, and line
+ number at which the message was generated follow. The filename is
+ terminated by a colon, and the function name is terminated by the
+ parenthesis which contain the line number. Depending upon the
+ compiler, the function name may be missing (it is generated by the
+ __FUNCTION__ macro, which is not universally implemented, dangit).
+ * The message text is made up of zero or more lines, each terminated
+ by a newline.
+
+ Here's some example output:
+
+ [1998/08/03 12:55:25, 1] nmbd.c:(659)
+ Netbios nameserver version 1.9.19-prealpha started.
+ Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1994-1997
+ [1998/08/03 12:55:25, 3] loadparm.c:(763)
+ Initializing global parameters
+
+ Note that in the above example the function names are not listed on
+ the header line. That's because the example above was generated on an
+ SGI Indy, and the SGI compiler doesn't support the __FUNCTION__ macro.
+
+The DEBUG() Macro
+
+ Use of the DEBUG() macro is unchanged. DEBUG() takes two parameters.
+ The first is the message level, the second is the body of a function
+ call to the Debug1() function.
+
+ That's confusing.
+
+ Here's an example which may help a bit. If you would write
+
+ printf( "This is a %s message.\n", "debug" );
+
+ to send the output to stdout, then you would write
+
+ DEBUG( 0, ( "This is a %s message.\n", "debug" ) );
+
+ to send the output to the debug file. All of the normal printf()
+ formatting escapes work.
+
+ Note that in the above example the DEBUG message level is set to 0.
+ Messages at level 0 always print. Basically, if the message level is
+ less than or equal to the global value DEBUGLEVEL, then the DEBUG
+ statement is processed.
+
+ The output of the above example would be something like:
+
+ [1998/07/30 16:00:51, 0] file.c:function(128)
+ This is a debug message.
+
+ Each call to DEBUG() creates a new header *unless* the output produced
+ by the previous call to DEBUG() did not end with a '\n'. Output to the
+ debug file is passed through a formatting buffer which is flushed
+ every time a newline is encountered. If the buffer is not empty when
+ DEBUG() is called, the new input is simply appended.
+
+ ...but that's really just a Kludge. It was put in place because
+ DEBUG() has been used to write partial lines. Here's a simple (dumb)
+ example of the kind of thing I'm talking about:
+
+ DEBUG( 0, ("The test returned " ) );
+ if( test() )
+ DEBUG(0, ("True") );
+ else
+ DEBUG(0, ("False") );
+ DEBUG(0, (".\n") );
+
+ Without the format buffer, the output (assuming test() returned true)
+ would look like this:
+
+ [1998/07/30 16:00:51, 0] file.c:function(256)
+ The test returned
+ [1998/07/30 16:00:51, 0] file.c:function(258)
+ True
+ [1998/07/30 16:00:51, 0] file.c:function(261)
+ .
+
+ Which isn't much use. The format buffer kludge fixes this problem.
+
+The DEBUGADD() Macro
+
+ In addition to the kludgey solution to the broken line problem
+ described above, there is a clean solution. The DEBUGADD() macro never
+ generates a header. It will append new text to the current debug
+ message even if the format buffer is empty. The syntax of the
+ DEBUGADD() macro is the same as that of the DEBUG() macro.
+
+ DEBUG( 0, ("This is the first line.\n" ) );
+ DEBUGADD( 0, ("This is the second line.\nThis is the third line.\n" ) );
+
+ Produces
+ [1998/07/30 16:00:51, 0] file.c:function(512)
+ This is the first line.
+ This is the second line.
+ This is the third line.
+
+The DEBUGLVL() Macro
+
+ One of the problems with the DEBUG() macro was that DEBUG() lines
+ tended to get a bit long. Consider this example from
+ nmbd_sendannounce.c:
+
+ DEBUG(3,("send_local_master_announcement: type %x for name %s on subnet %s for workgroup %s\n",
+ type, global_myname, subrec->subnet_name, work->work_group));
+
+ One solution to this is to break it down using DEBUG() and DEBUGADD(),
+ as follows:
+
+ DEBUG( 3, ( "send_local_master_announcement: " ) );
+ DEBUGADD( 3, ( "type %x for name %s ", type, global_myname ) );
+ DEBUGADD( 3, ( "on subnet %s ", subrec->subnet_name ) );
+ DEBUGADD( 3, ( "for workgroup %s\n", work->work_group ) );
+
+ A similar, but arguably nicer approach is to use the DEBUGLVL() macro.
+ This macro returns True if the message level is less than or equal to
+ the global DEBUGLEVEL value, so:
+
+ if( DEBUGLVL( 3 ) )
+ {
+ dbgtext( "send_local_master_announcement: " );
+ dbgtext( "type %x for name %s ", type, global_myname );
+ dbgtext( "on subnet %s ", subrec->subnet_name );
+ dbgtext( "for workgroup %s\n", work->work_group );
+ }
+
+ (The dbgtext() function is explained below.)
+
+ There are a few advantages to this scheme:
+ * The test is performed only once.
+ * You can allocate variables off of the stack that will only be used
+ within the DEBUGLVL() block.
+ * Processing that is only relevant to debug output can be contained
+ within the DEBUGLVL() block.
+
+New Functions
+
+ dbgtext()
+ This function prints debug message text to the debug file (and
+ possibly to syslog) via the format buffer. The function uses a
+ variable argument list just like printf() or Debug1(). The
+ input is printed into a buffer using the vslprintf() function,
+ and then passed to format_debug_text().
+
+ If you use DEBUGLVL() you will probably print the body of the
+ message using dbgtext().
+
+ dbghdr()
+ This is the function that writes a debug message header.
+ Headers are not processed via the format buffer. Also note that
+ if the format buffer is not empty, a call to dbghdr() will not
+ produce any output. See the comments in dbghdr() for more info.
+
+ It is not likely that this function will be called directly. It
+ is used by DEBUG() and DEBUGADD().
+
+ format_debug_text()
+ This is a static function in debug.c. It stores the output text
+ for the body of the message in a buffer until it encounters a
+ newline. When the newline character is found, the buffer is
+ written to the debug file via the Debug1() function, and the
+ buffer is reset. This allows us to add the indentation at the
+ beginning of each line of the message body, and also ensures
+ that the output is written a line at a time (which cleans up
+ syslog output).