summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMichael Adam <obnox@samba.org>2018-09-20 12:45:17 +0200
committerJeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>2020-06-27 04:20:38 +0000
commit6b6086bb58cf185145eeac99f146bf96b5311112 (patch)
tree3f1e837ef5c821957384d125909612c548c055e1
parentfad2bd8ec7a2b2fc873792519e56564fdd750e85 (diff)
downloadsamba-6b6086bb58cf185145eeac99f146bf96b5311112.tar.gz
s4:torture/smb2: fix and improve the smb2.lock.replay test
The test was wrong in that it used an invalid lock sequence bucket (65) where it actually wanted to use a valid on (64), and hence the test results (which were adapted to the real responses) were not quite logical. This patch fixes this and also improves some of the comments so that the flow of the patch becomes a little more obvious. Pair-Programmed-With: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
-rw-r--r--source4/torture/smb2/lock.c69
1 files changed, 53 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/source4/torture/smb2/lock.c b/source4/torture/smb2/lock.c
index 8dca75cc6c1..5cb4a0376c4 100644
--- a/source4/torture/smb2/lock.c
+++ b/source4/torture/smb2/lock.c
@@ -2913,7 +2913,7 @@ static bool test_replay(struct torture_context *torture,
.in.file.handle = h
};
- torture_comment(torture, "Testing Lock (ignored) Replay detection:\n");
+ torture_comment(torture, "Testing Lock Replay detection [ignored]:\n");
lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x010 + 0x1;
el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY;
status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
@@ -2942,8 +2942,12 @@ static bool test_replay(struct torture_context *torture,
status = smb2_ioctl(tree, torture, &ioctl);
CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ /*
+ * Test with an invalid bucket number (only 1..64 are valid).
+ * With an invalid number, lock replay detection is not performed.
+ */
torture_comment(torture, "Testing Lock (ignored) Replay detection "
- "(Bucket No: 0):\n");
+ "(Bucket No: 0 (invalid)) [ignored]:\n");
lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x000 + 0x1;
el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY;
status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
@@ -2987,6 +2991,8 @@ static bool test_replay(struct torture_context *torture,
status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ /* status: still locked */
+
/*
* Server will not grant same Byte Range using a different Bucket Seq
*/
@@ -2998,11 +3004,25 @@ static bool test_replay(struct torture_context *torture,
CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED);
torture_comment(torture, "Testing Lock Replay detection "
- "(Bucket No: 64):\n");
+ "(Bucket No: 2):\n");
/*
* Server will not grant same Byte Range using a different Bucket Num
*/
+ lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x020 + 0x1;
+ el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY;
+ status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED);
+ status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED);
+
+ /* status: still locked */
+
+ /* test with invalid bucket when file is locked */
+
+ torture_comment(torture, "Testing Lock Replay detection "
+ "(Bucket No: 65 (invalid)) [ignored]:\n");
+
lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x410 + 0x1;
el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY;
status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
@@ -3010,39 +3030,56 @@ static bool test_replay(struct torture_context *torture,
status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED);
- /*
- * Test Unlock replay detection
- */
- lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x410 + 0x2;
el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_UNLOCK;
status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
- CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_LOCKED);
+
+ /* status: unlocked */
+
+ /*
+ * Lock again for the unlock replay test
+ */
el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY;
status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
- lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x410 + 0x3;
- el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_UNLOCK;
- status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
- CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_LOCKED);
+ torture_comment(torture, "Testing Lock Replay detection "
+ "(Bucket No: 64):\n");
- torture_comment(torture, "Testing Lock (ignored) Replay detection "
- "(Bucket No: 65):\n");
- lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x420 + 0x1;
+ /*
+ * Server will not grant same Byte Range using a different Bucket Num
+ */
+ lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x400 + 0x1;
el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY;
status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
- CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED);
status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED);
+ /*
+ * Test Unlock replay detection
+ */
+ lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x400 + 0x2;
el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_UNLOCK;
status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK); /* new seq num ==> unlocked */
+ status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK); /* replay detected ==> ignored */
+
+ el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY;
+ status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck); /* same seq num ==> ignored */
CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+ /* verify it's unlocked: */
+ lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x400 + 0x3;
+ el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_UNLOCK;
status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_LOCKED);
+ /* status: not locked */
+
done:
smb2_util_close(tree, h);
smb2_deltree(tree, BASEDIR);