1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
|
# Clang Tidy
[TOC]
## Introduction
[clang-tidy](http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/) is a clang-based C++
“linter” tool. Its purpose is to provide an extensible framework for diagnosing
and fixing typical programming errors, like style violations, interface misuse,
or bugs that can be deduced via static analysis.
## Where is it?
clang-tidy is available in two places in Chromium:
- In Chromium checkouts
- In code review on Gerrit
Clang-tidy automatically runs on any CL that Chromium committers upload to
Gerrit, and will leave code review comments there. This is the recommended way
of using clang-tidy.
## Enabled checks
Chromium globally enables a subset of all of clang-tidy's checks (see
`${chromium}/src/.clang-tidy`). We want these checks to cover as much as we
reasonably can, but we also strive to strike a reasonable balance between signal
and noise on code reviews. Hence, a large number of clang-tidy checks are
disabled.
### Adding a new check
New checks require review from cxx@chromium.org. If you propose a check and it
gets approved, you may turn it on, though please note that this is only
provisional approval: we get signal from users clicking "Not Useful" on
comments. If feedback is overwhelmingly "users don't find this useful," the
check may be removed.
Traditionally, petitions to add checks include [an
evaluation](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i1KmXtDD4j_qjhmAdGlJ6UkYXByVX1Kp952Zusdcl5k/edit?usp=sharing)
of the check under review. Crucially, this includes two things:
- a count of how many times this check fires across Chromium
- a random sample (>30) of places where the check fires across Chromium
It's expected that the person proposing the check has manually surveyed every
clang-tidy diagnostic in the sample, noting any bugs, odd behaviors, or
interesting patterns they've noticed. If clang-tidy emits FixIts, these are
expected to be considered by the evaluation, too.
An example of a previous proposal email thread is
[here](https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/cxx/c/iZ6-Y9ZhC3Q/m/g-8HzqmbAAAJ).
#### Evaluating: running clang-tidy across Chromium
Running clang-tidy requires some setup. First, you'll need to sync clang-tidy,
which requires adding `checkout_clang_tidy` to your `.gclient` file:
```
solutions = [
{
'custom_vars': {
'checkout_clang_tidy': True,
},
}
]
```
Your next run of `gclient runhooks` should cause clang-tidy to be synced.
To run clang-tidy across all of Chromium, you'll need a checkout of Chromium's
[build/](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/tools/build) repository.
Once you have that and a Chromium `out/` dir with an `args.gn`, running
clang-tidy across all of Chromium is a single command:
```
$ cd ${chromium}/src
$ ${chromium_build}/recipes/recipe_modules/tricium_clang_tidy/resources/tricium_clang_tidy.py \
--base_path $PWD \
--out_dir out/Linux \
--findings_file all_findings.json \
--clang_tidy_binary $PWD/third_party/llvm-build/Release+Asserts/bin/clang-tidy \
--all
```
All clang-tidy checks are run on Linux builds of Chromium, so please set up your
`args.gn` to build Linux.
`all_findings.json` is where all of clang-tidy's findings will be dumped. The
format of this file is detailed in `tricium_clang_tidy.py`.
**Note** that the above command will use Chromium's top-level `.clang-tidy` file
(or `.clang-tidy` files scattered throughout `third_party/`, depending on the
files we lint. In order to test a *new* check, you'll have to add it to
Chromium's top-level `.clang-tidy` file.
### Ignoring a check
If a check is invalid on a particular piece of code, clang-tidy supports `//
NOLINT` and `// NOLINTNEXTLINE` for ignoring all lint checks in the current and
next lines, respectively. To suppress a specific lint, you can put it in
parenthesis, e.g., `// NOLINTNEXTLINE(modernize-use-nullptr)`. For more, please
see [the documentation](
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/#suppressing-undesired-diagnostics).
**Please note** that adding comments that exist only to silence clang-tidy is
actively discouraged. These comments clutter code, can easily get
out-of-date, and don't provide much value to readers. Moreover, clang-tidy only
complains on Gerrit when lines are touched, and making Chromium clang-tidy clean
is an explicit non-goal; making code less readable in order to silence a
rarely-surfaced complaint isn't a good trade-off.
If clang-tidy emits a diagnostic that's incorrect due to a subtlety in the code,
adding an explanantion of what the code is doing with a trailing `NOLINT` may be
fine. Put differently, the comment should be able to stand on its own even if we
removed the `NOLINT`. The fact that the comment also silences clang-tidy is a
convenient side-effect.
For example:
Not OK; comment exists just to silence clang-tidy:
```
// NOLINTNEXTLINE
for (int i = 0; i < arr.size(); i++) {
// ...
}
```
Not OK; comment exists just to verbosely silence clang-tidy:
```
// Clang-tidy doesn't get that we can't range-for-ize this loop. NOLINTNEXTLINE
for (int i = 0; i < arr.size(); i++) {
// ...
}
```
Not OK; it's obvious that this loop modifies `arr`, so the comment doesn't
actually clarify anything:
```
// It'd be invalid to make this into a range-for loop, since the body might add
// elements to `arr`. NOLINTNEXTLINE
for (int i = 0; i < arr.size(); i++) {
if (i % 4) {
arr.push_back(4);
arr.push_back(2);
}
}
```
OK; comment calls out a non-obvious property of this loop's body. As an
afterthought, it silences clang-tidy:
```
// It'd be invalid to make this into a range-for loop, since the call to `foo`
// here might add elements to `arr`. NOLINTNEXTLINE
for (int i = 0; i < arr.size(); i++) {
foo();
bar();
}
```
In the end, as always, what is and isn't obvious at some point is highly
context-dependent. Please use your best judgement.
## But I want to run it locally
If you want to sync the officially-supported `clang-tidy` to your workstation,
add the following to your .gclient file:
```
solutions = [
{
'custom_vars': {
'checkout_clang_tidy': True,
},
},
]
```
If you already have `solutions` and `custom_vars`, just add
`checkout_clang_tidy` to the existing `custom_vars` map.
Once the above update has been made, run `gclient runhooks`, and clang-tidy
should appear at `src/third_party/llvm-build/Release+Asserts/bin/clang-tidy` if
your Chromium tree is sufficiently up-to-date.
### Running clang-tidy locally
**Note** that the local flows with clang-tidy are experimental, and require an
LLVM checkout. Tricium is happy to run on WIP CLs, and we strongly encourage its
use.
That said, assuming you have the LLVM sources available, you'll need to bring
your own `clang-apply-replacements` binary if you want to use the `-fix` option
noted below.
Running clang-tidy is (hopefully) simple.
1. Build chrome normally.
```
ninja -C out/Release chrome
```
2. Enter the build directory
```
cd out/Release
```
3. Export Chrome's compile command database
```
gn gen . --export-compile-commands
```
4. Run clang-tidy.
```
<PATH_TO_LLVM_SRC>/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py \
-p . \# Set the root project directory, where compile_commands.json is.
# Set the clang-tidy binary path, if it's not in your $PATH.
-clang-tidy-binary <PATH_TO_LLVM_BUILD>/bin/clang-tidy \
# Set the clang-apply-replacements binary path, if it's not in your $PATH
# and you are using the `fix` behavior of clang-tidy.
-clang-apply-replacements-binary \
<PATH_TO_LLVM_BUILD>/bin/clang-apply-replacements \
# The checks to employ in the build. Use `-*,...` to omit default checks.
-checks=<CHECKS> \
-header-filter=<FILTER> \# Optional, limit results to only certain files.
-fix \# Optional, used if you want to have clang-tidy auto-fix errors.
'chrome/browser/.*' # A regex of the files you want to check.
Copy-Paste Friendly (though you'll still need to stub in the variables):
<PATH_TO_LLVM_SRC>/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py \
-p . \
-clang-tidy-binary <PATH_TO_LLVM_BUILD>/bin/clang-tidy \
-clang-apply-replacements-binary \
<PATH_TO_LLVM_BUILD>/bin/clang-apply-replacements \
-checks=<CHECKS> \
-header-filter=<FILTER> \
-fix \
'chrome/browser/.*'
```
Note that the source file regex must match how the build specified the file.
This means that on Windows, you must use (escaped) backslashes even from a bash
shell.
### Questions
Questions about the local flow? Reach out to rdevlin.cronin@chromium.org,
thakis@chromium.org, or gbiv@chromium.org.
Questions about the Gerrit flow? Email tricium-dev@google.com or
infra-dev+tricium@chromium.org, or file a bug against `Infra>Platform>Tricium`.
Please CC gbiv@chromium.org on any of these.
Discoveries? Update the doc!
|