summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/webchannel/qwebchannel_p.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/5.6' into 5.7v5.7.0-alpha1Liang Qi2016-02-151-0/+11
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | Conflicts: .qmake.conf Change-Id: I42bfb38e5a9bf03b43636309fe9e29e8d772bb06
| * Add the "We mean it" warning to private headersv5.6.0-rc1v5.6.05.6.0Sergio Martins2016-02-091-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | Change-Id: I34bcf2e4a2d66c9cb126c2edae79a45064b82a67 Reviewed-by: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
* | Updated license headersAntti Kokko2016-01-201-14/+20
|/ | | | | | | | | | From Qt 5.7 -> LGPL v2.1 isn't an option anymore, see http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/ Updated license headers to use new LGPL header instead of LGPL21 one (in those files which will be under LGPL v3) Change-Id: I2fe282e6b9d52f9635cd69e3e8de53724cbb8b0a Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
* Update copyright headersv5.5.0-alpha1Antti Kokko2015-02-171-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | Qt copyrights are now in The Qt Company, so we could update the source code headers accordingly. In the same go we should also fix the links to point to qt.io. Change-Id: Iebed549451f58a9fbdd86adf5d0340412d7766d7 Reviewed-by: Jani Heikkinen <jani.heikkinen@theqtcompany.com>
* Update license headers and add new licensesJani Heikkinen2014-08-261-18/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Renamed LICENSE.LGPL to LICENSE.LGPLv21 - Added LICENSE.LGPLv3 & LICENSE.GPLv2 - Removed LICENSE.GPL Furthermore we need to update the sync.profile to not point to the dev branch in order to integrate this patch in the CI. Change-Id: I06b5496b5d865e2da4808532362616429c969658 Reviewed-by: Sergio Ahumada <sahumada@blackberry.com> Reviewed-by: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
* Refactor and streamline API and IPC protocol.Milian Wolff2014-07-291-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch removes the obsolete API support to send raw messages using a QWebChannel. Instead, it is encouraged to directly use WebSockets or navigator.qt. By doing so, we can cleanup the code considerably. While at it, the transport API is adapted to work on QJsonObject messages, instead of QStrings. This will allow us to use more efficient formats in e.g. QtWebKit or QtWebEngine. One could also implement a JSONRPC interface using a custom transport then. Change-Id: Ia8c125a5558507b3cbecf128a46b19fdb013f47b Reviewed-by: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@digia.com>
* Make the QWebChannel QML API publically accessible.Milian Wolff2014-07-151-1/+6
| | | | | | | | | | This is required for proper QtWebKit/QtWebEngine integration, as otherwise these modules would have to redo a lot of the QtWebChannel QML API. Furthermore, without this, we could not use the WebChannel.id attached property everywhere, independent of the web browser technology. Change-Id: I032a9326841d505c2f77959a240bbfc71e94b6e8 Reviewed-by: Sean Harmer <sean.harmer@kdab.com>
* Refactor code to use QWebChannelAbstractTransport and QtWebSockets.Milian Wolff2014-07-041-3/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a quite big changeset, but necessary to get the roadmap implemented that was discussed at QtCS. With this patchset landed, the QWebChannel does not depend on QtWebKit anymore, not even for the tests. Rather, we will introduce the dependency in the other way (i.e. QtWebKit will optionally use QtWebChannel if available). For the pure Qt/C++ use-case, we ship a utility implementation of a QWebChannelAbstractTransport that uses a QWebSocket for the server-client communication. This way, we can get rid of the custom WebSocket implementation. The tests are refactored to run the qwebchannel.js code directly inside QML. Integration tests for QtWebKit/QtWebEngine as well as examples will be added to these repositories. Change-Id: Icc1c1c5918ec46e31d5070937c14c4ca25a3e2d6 Reviewed-by: Pierre Rossi <pierre.rossi@gmail.com>
* Send response data only to target client.Milian Wolff2014-03-211-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Before, the response was sent to all clients in a broad-cast and had to be filtered on the client-side. This required additional client identification data to be added to all requests and responses. Now, we keep track of the transport and transport-internal client and only send the response to that client. This is very benefitial for multi-client setups but also reduces traffic for single-client setups and thus their performance. Change-Id: Ia1ef5e031b0058222083d352a8aa28a7d566a6ca Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@digia.com>
* Make the underlying transport mechanism of the webchannel pluggable.Milian Wolff2014-02-061-2/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This enables us to optionally use navigator.qt instead of a WebSocket, which is nicer setup-wise and is also slightly faster: navigator.qt: 284.0 msecs per iteration (total: 2,840, iterations: 10) WebSocket: 295.8 msecs per iteration (total: 2,959, iterations: 10) The baseline is ca. 203 msecs, which would mean a performance boost of ca. 12.7%. Furthermore, this sets the fundation to eventually add a WebEngine transport mechanism. The WebViewTransport should also be removed and instead the WebView itself should directly implement the WebChannelTransportInterface. Change-Id: I368bb27e38ffa2f17ffeb7f5ae695690f6f5ad21 Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@digia.com>
* Fix compilation when building with namespaced Qt.Milian Wolff2014-01-311-0/+4
| | | | | | | | Wrap everything in the QtWebChannel module with the Qt namespace or use the Qt namespace where appropriate. Change-Id: I1ef2b2f5eb22ec5e04ca76c034ef8ebf4043b899 Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@digia.com>
* Fixup license headers of the files written by me.Milian Wolff2014-01-161-3/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | Some tests referenced Nokia in their license even though that was never the case. The tests where written completely by me after Qt Nokia times. What is missing are the examples which are still mostly original work by Noam back then in Nokia times. The rest was (re-)written by me completely since then anyways. Change-Id: Ib423fb3459bcc1f7464a02de4fd82ddfd614d282 Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@digia.com>
* Simplify usage of QWebChannel on the server side.Milian Wolff2014-01-081-0/+60
This is achieved by hiding the MetaObjectPublisher completely as private API. The QWebChannel is the only publisher API and now handles both the socket as well as the publisher internally. This now allows us to create a proper QML api in the new QmlWebChannel. Change-Id: I3096364af8485353ca9bc19df4a81a8e4552c3d7 Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@digia.com>