| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From Qt 5.7 -> LGPL v2.1 isn't an option anymore, see
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/
Updated license headers to use new LGPL header instead of LGPL21 one
(in those files which will be under LGPL v3)
Change-Id: I2fe282e6b9d52f9635cd69e3e8de53724cbb8b0a
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Qt copyrights are now in The Qt Company, so we could update the source
code headers accordingly. In the same go we should also fix the links to
point to qt.io.
Change-Id: Iebed549451f58a9fbdd86adf5d0340412d7766d7
Reviewed-by: Jani Heikkinen <jani.heikkinen@theqtcompany.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Renamed LICENSE.LGPL to LICENSE.LGPLv21
- Added LICENSE.LGPLv3 & LICENSE.GPLv2
- Removed LICENSE.GPL
Furthermore we need to update the sync.profile to not
point to the dev branch in order to integrate
this patch in the CI.
Change-Id: I06b5496b5d865e2da4808532362616429c969658
Reviewed-by: Sergio Ahumada <sahumada@blackberry.com>
Reviewed-by: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Please proof-read it and tell me what needs to be improved. I assume
most people will probably not use the QWebChannel directly. Rather, they
will only consume its features indirectly through the integration in
QtWebKit/QtWebEngine. Thus the documentation here is for QWebChannel as
a library. User-end documentation should be added to QtWebKit, I think.
Change-Id: I259c204e24331271b8dc74ea11695988234a79d3
Reviewed-by: Jerome Pasion <jerome.pasion@digia.com>
|
|
|
This is required for proper QtWebKit/QtWebEngine integration, as
otherwise these modules would have to redo a lot of the QtWebChannel
QML API. Furthermore, without this, we could not use the WebChannel.id
attached property everywhere, independent of the web browser technology.
Change-Id: I032a9326841d505c2f77959a240bbfc71e94b6e8
Reviewed-by: Sean Harmer <sean.harmer@kdab.com>
|
