| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These issues were raised by Sze Howe Koh in code review 89965 of
change I259c204e. This change set does not yet include any comparison
to the old Qt WebKit bridging functionality. I'll hand this in later.
Change-Id: Idc7df0e02bfcda3c3fcf1a4e147c1dfac4f18a64
Reviewed-by: Sze Howe Koh <szehowe.koh@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Please proof-read it and tell me what needs to be improved. I assume
most people will probably not use the QWebChannel directly. Rather, they
will only consume its features indirectly through the integration in
QtWebKit/QtWebEngine. Thus the documentation here is for QWebChannel as
a library. User-end documentation should be added to QtWebKit, I think.
Change-Id: I259c204e24331271b8dc74ea11695988234a79d3
Reviewed-by: Jerome Pasion <jerome.pasion@digia.com>
|
|
|
This text can then be used in the future for proper qdoc integration.
Change-Id: If75b98c0aa1aa131b52542c97a5c2bf382171729
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@digia.com>
|
