Use content mechanism to retrieve reviews

This means we no longer need the qplacereviewreply or the
paginationlist.

We also create a QPlaceContentRequest class to specialize
in requesting content.  It follows the same pattern that
QPlaceContent does where the private classes use inheritance
to mirror the public classes so that we only have a single
d pointer instance per class(as opposed to a dpointer for
QPlaceRequest and a dpointer for QPlaceContentRequest).
QPlaceSeachRequest has been modified like this as well.

Also in the nokia plugin we rename the qplaceimagereplyimpl class
to the qplacecontentreplyimpl class.  We use this to get the reviews
as well as images and we no longer need the qplacereviewreplyimpl class.

Change-Id: I0aa1254a4df3d136bf81f9faf0f6ec06a0773100
Reviewed-on: http://codereview.qt.nokia.com/3305
Reviewed-by: Qt Sanity Bot <qt_sanity_bot@ovi.com>
Reviewed-by: abcd <qt_abcd1@ovi.com>

2 files changed, 82 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tests/auto/qplacecontentrequest/qplacecontentrequest.pro b/tests/auto/qplacecontentrequest/qplacecontentrequest.pro
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6e27c4ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/auto/qplacecontentrequest/qplacecontentrequest.pro
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+TEMPLATE = app
+CONFIG += testcase
+TARGET = tst_qplacecontentrequest
+SOURCES += tst_qplacecontentrequest.cpp
+
+QT += location testlib
diff --git a/tests/auto/qplacecontentrequest/tst_qplacecontentrequest.cpp b/tests/auto/qplacecontentrequest/tst_qplacecontentrequest.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..74e00915
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/auto/qplacecontentrequest/tst_qplacecontentrequest.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+#include <QtCore/QString>
+#include <QtTest/QtTest>
+
+#include <qplacecontentrequest.h>
+
+QT_USE_NAMESPACE
+
+class tst_QPlaceContentRequest : public QObject
+{
+    Q_OBJECT
+
+public:
+    tst_QPlaceContentRequest();
+
+private Q_SLOTS:
+    void contentTest();
+    void clearTest();
+};
+
+tst_QPlaceContentRequest::tst_QPlaceContentRequest()
+{
+}
+
+void tst_QPlaceContentRequest::contentTest()
+{
+    QPlaceContentRequest req;
+    QCOMPARE(req.limit(), -1);
+    QCOMPARE(req.offset(), 0);
+    QCOMPARE(req.contentType(), QPlaceContent::InvalidType);
+
+    //check that we can set the request fields
+    req.setLimit(100);
+    req.setOffset(5);
+    req.setContentType(QPlaceContent::ImageType);
+    QCOMPARE(req.limit(), 100);
+    QCOMPARE(req.offset(), 5);
+    QCOMPARE(req.contentType(), QPlaceContent::ImageType);
+
+    //check that we assignment works correctly
+    QPlaceContentRequest otherReq;
+    otherReq.setLimit(10);
+    otherReq.setOffset(15);
+    otherReq.setContentType(QPlaceContent::ReviewType);
+    req = otherReq;
+    QCOMPARE(req.limit(), 10);
+    QCOMPARE(req.offset(), 15);
+    QCOMPARE(req.contentType(), QPlaceContent::ReviewType);
+
+    //check assigningment to a base class instance and comparison
+    QPlaceRequest plainReq(otherReq);
+    QVERIFY(req == otherReq);
+
+    //check assignment from base class to derived class
+    QPlaceContentRequest contentReq = plainReq;
+    QVERIFY(contentReq == req);
+
+   //check that comparison will fail if one the fields are different
+    contentReq.setLimit(9000);
+    QVERIFY(contentReq != req);
+}
+
+void tst_QPlaceContentRequest::clearTest()
+{
+    QPlaceContentRequest req;
+    req.setContentType(QPlaceContent::ReviewType);
+    req.setLimit(9000);
+    req.setOffset(1);
+    req.clear();
+    QVERIFY(req.contentType() == QPlaceContent::InvalidType);
+    QVERIFY(req.limit() == -1);
+    QVERIFY(req.offset() == 0);
+}
+
+QTEST_APPLESS_MAIN(tst_QPlaceContentRequest);
+
+#include "tst_qplacecontentrequest.moc"