1 files changed, 425 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/deps/gyp/test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py b/deps/gyp/test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..72de21813c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/deps/gyp/test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py
@@ -0,0 +1,425 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+# Copyright (c) 2014 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
+# Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+# found in the LICENSE file.
+
+"""Tests for analyzer
+"""
+
+import json
+import TestGyp
+
+found = 'Found dependency'
+found_all = 'Found dependency (all)'
+not_found = 'No dependencies'
+
+
+def _CreateConfigFile(files, additional_compile_targets, test_targets=[]):
+  """Creates the analyzer config file, which is used as the input to analyzer.
+  See description of analyzer.py for description of the arguments."""
+  f = open('test_file', 'w')
+  to_write = {'files': files,
+              'test_targets': test_targets,
+              'additional_compile_targets': additional_compile_targets }
+  json.dump(to_write, f)
+  f.close()
+
+
+def _CreateBogusConfigFile():
+  f = open('test_file','w')
+  f.write('bogus')
+  f.close()
+
+
+def _ReadOutputFileContents():
+  f = open('analyzer_output', 'r')
+  result = json.load(f)
+  f.close()
+  return result
+
+
+# NOTE: this would be clearer if it subclassed TestGypCustom, but that trips
+# over a bug in pylint (E1002).
+test = TestGyp.TestGypCustom(format='analyzer')
+
+def CommonArgs():
+  return ('-Gconfig_path=test_file',
+           '-Ganalyzer_output_path=analyzer_output')
+
+
+def run_analyzer(*args, **kw):
+  """Runs the test specifying a particular config and output path."""
+  args += CommonArgs()
+  test.run_gyp('test.gyp', *args, **kw)
+
+
+def run_analyzer2(*args, **kw):
+  """Same as run_analyzer(), but passes in test2.gyp instead of test.gyp."""
+  args += CommonArgs()
+  test.run_gyp('test2.gyp', *args, **kw)
+
+
+def run_analyzer3(*args, **kw):
+  """Same as run_analyzer(), but passes in test3.gyp instead of test.gyp."""
+  args += CommonArgs()
+  test.run_gyp('test3.gyp', *args, **kw)
+
+
+def run_analyzer4(*args, **kw):
+  """Same as run_analyzer(), but passes in test3.gyp instead of test.gyp."""
+  args += CommonArgs()
+  test.run_gyp('test4.gyp', *args, **kw)
+
+
+def EnsureContains(matched=False, compile_targets=set(), test_targets=set()):
+  """Verifies output contains |compile_targets|."""
+  result = _ReadOutputFileContents()
+  if 'error' in result:
+    print 'unexpected error', result.get('error')
+    test.fail_test()
+
+  if 'invalid_targets' in result:
+    print 'unexpected invalid_targets', result.get('invalid_targets')
+    test.fail_test()
+
+  actual_compile_targets = set(result['compile_targets'])
+  if actual_compile_targets != compile_targets:
+    print 'actual compile_targets:', actual_compile_targets, \
+           '\nexpected compile_targets:', compile_targets
+    test.fail_test()
+
+  actual_test_targets = set(result['test_targets'])
+  if actual_test_targets != test_targets:
+    print 'actual test_targets:', actual_test_targets, \
+           '\nexpected test_targets:', test_targets
+    test.fail_test()
+
+  if matched and result['status'] != found:
+    print 'expected', found, 'got', result['status']
+    test.fail_test()
+  elif not matched and result['status'] != not_found:
+    print 'expected', not_found, 'got', result['status']
+    test.fail_test()
+
+
+def EnsureMatchedAll(compile_targets, test_targets=set()):
+  result = _ReadOutputFileContents()
+  if 'error' in result:
+    print 'unexpected error', result.get('error')
+    test.fail_test()
+
+  if 'invalid_targets' in result:
+    print 'unexpected invalid_targets', result.get('invalid_targets')
+    test.fail_test()
+
+  if result['status'] != found_all:
+    print 'expected', found_all, 'got', result['status']
+    test.fail_test()
+
+  actual_compile_targets = set(result['compile_targets'])
+  if actual_compile_targets != compile_targets:
+    print ('actual compile_targets:', actual_compile_targets,
+           '\nexpected compile_targets:', compile_targets)
+    test.fail_test()
+
+  actual_test_targets = set(result['test_targets'])
+  if actual_test_targets != test_targets:
+    print ('actual test_targets:', actual_test_targets,
+           '\nexpected test_targets:', test_targets)
+    test.fail_test()
+
+
+def EnsureError(expected_error_string):
+  """Verifies output contains the error string."""
+  result = _ReadOutputFileContents()
+  if result.get('error', '').find(expected_error_string) == -1:
+    print 'actual error:', result.get('error', ''), '\nexpected error:', \
+        expected_error_string
+    test.fail_test()
+
+
+def EnsureStdoutContains(expected_error_string):
+  if test.stdout().find(expected_error_string) == -1:
+    print 'actual stdout:', test.stdout(), '\nexpected stdout:', \
+        expected_error_string
+    test.fail_test()
+
+
+def EnsureInvalidTargets(expected_invalid_targets):
+  """Verifies output contains invalid_targets."""
+  result = _ReadOutputFileContents()
+  actual_invalid_targets = set(result['invalid_targets'])
+  if actual_invalid_targets != expected_invalid_targets:
+    print 'actual invalid_targets:', actual_invalid_targets, \
+        '\nexpected :', expected_invalid_targets
+    test.fail_test()
+
+
+# Two targets, A and B (both static_libraries) and A depends upon B. If a file
+# in B changes, then both A and B are output. It is not strictly necessary that
+# A is compiled in this case, only B.
+_CreateConfigFile(['b.c'], ['all'])
+test.run_gyp('static_library_test.gyp', *CommonArgs())
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'a' ,'b'})
+
+# Verifies config_path must be specified.
+test.run_gyp('test.gyp')
+EnsureStdoutContains('Must specify files to analyze via config_path')
+
+# Verifies config_path must point to a valid file.
+test.run_gyp('test.gyp', '-Gconfig_path=bogus_file',
+             '-Ganalyzer_output_path=analyzer_output')
+EnsureError('Unable to open file bogus_file')
+
+# Verify 'invalid_targets' is present when bad target is specified.
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['bad_target'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureInvalidTargets({'bad_target'})
+
+# Verifies config_path must point to a valid json file.
+_CreateBogusConfigFile()
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureError('Unable to parse config file test_file')
+
+# Trivial test of a source.
+_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'})
+
+# Conditional source that is excluded.
+_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=False)
+
+# Conditional source that is included by way of argument.
+_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer('-Dtest_variable=1')
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'})
+
+# Two unknown files.
+_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'unoknow2.cc'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains()
+
+# Two unknown files.
+_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_sourcex.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains()
+
+# Included dependency
+_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_source.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe', 'exe3'})
+
+# Included inputs to actions.
+_CreateConfigFile(['action_input.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'})
+
+# Don't consider outputs.
+_CreateConfigFile(['action_output.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=False)
+
+# Rule inputs.
+_CreateConfigFile(['rule_input.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'})
+
+# Ignore path specified with PRODUCT_DIR.
+_CreateConfigFile(['product_dir_input.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=False)
+
+# Path specified via a variable.
+_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source2.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'})
+
+# Verifies paths with // are fixed up correctly.
+_CreateConfigFile(['parent_source.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe', 'exe3'})
+
+# Verifies relative paths are resolved correctly.
+_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source.h'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'})
+
+# Verifies relative paths in inputs are resolved correctly.
+_CreateConfigFile(['rel_path1.h'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'})
+
+# Various permutations when passing in targets.
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'],
+                  ['all'], ['exe', 'exe3'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe3'},
+               compile_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['all'], ['exe'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
+
+# Verifies duplicates are ignored.
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['all'],
+                  ['exe', 'exe'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['all'], ['exe'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe2'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe2'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c', 'exe2.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['all'], ['exe3'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe3'}, compile_targets={'exe3'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe2'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'})
+
+# Assertions when modifying build (gyp/gypi) files, especially when said files
+# are included.
+_CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/d.cc'], ['all'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
+run_analyzer2()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe', 'foo'},
+               compile_targets={'exe', 'foo'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/subdir.includes.gypi'], ['all'],
+                ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
+run_analyzer2()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe', 'foo'},
+               compile_targets={'exe', 'foo'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/subdir.gyp'], ['all'],
+                  ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
+run_analyzer2()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe', 'foo'},
+               compile_targets={'exe', 'foo'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['test2.includes.gypi'], ['all'],
+                  ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
+run_analyzer2()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe', 'exe2', 'exe3'},
+               compile_targets={'exe', 'exe2', 'exe3'})
+
+# Verify modifying a file included makes all targets dirty.
+_CreateConfigFile(['common.gypi'], ['all'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
+run_analyzer2('-Icommon.gypi')
+EnsureMatchedAll({'all', 'exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'},
+                 {'exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'})
+
+# Assertions from test3.gyp.
+_CreateConfigFile(['d.c', 'f.c'], ['all'], ['a'])
+run_analyzer3()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a'}, compile_targets={'a', 'b'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['all'], ['a'])
+run_analyzer3()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a'}, compile_targets={'a', 'b'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer3()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'a', 'b'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['c.c', 'e.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer3()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'a', 'b', 'c', 'e'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['all'], ['a'])
+run_analyzer3()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a'}, compile_targets={'a', 'b'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['all'], ['a', 'b'])
+run_analyzer3()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a'}, compile_targets={'a'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['all'], ['a', 'b'])
+run_analyzer3()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a'}, compile_targets={'a'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['all'], ['a', 'b'])
+run_analyzer3()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a', 'b'},
+               compile_targets={'a', 'b'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['all'], ['a'])
+run_analyzer3()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a'}, compile_targets={'a', 'b'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['all'], ['a'])
+run_analyzer3()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a'}, compile_targets={'a'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer3()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'a'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer3()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'a', 'b'})
+
+# Assertions around test4.gyp.
+_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer4()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'e', 'f'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer4()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'a', 'b', 'c', 'd'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['i.c'], ['all'])
+run_analyzer4()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'h', 'i'})
+
+# Assertions where 'all' is not supplied in compile_targets.
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], [], ['exe2'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe2'}, compile_targets={'exe2'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe20.c'], [], ['exe2'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=False)
+
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'exe3.c'], [], ['exe2', 'exe3'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'},
+               compile_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'exe3.c'], ['exe3'], ['exe2'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe2'},
+               compile_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe3.c'], ['exe2'], ['exe2'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=False)
+
+# Assertions with 'all' listed as a test_target.
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe3.c'], [], ['all'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe3', 'all'},
+               test_targets={'all'})
+
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], [], ['all', 'exe2'])
+run_analyzer()
+EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe2', 'all'},
+               test_targets={'all', 'exe2'})
+
+test.pass_test()