diff options
author | Ben Nathanson <github@bigriver.xyz> | 2020-10-04 13:13:05 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ben Nathanson <github@bigriver.xyz> | 2020-10-04 13:13:05 -0400 |
commit | 7fb0b02df1ca5b388f81f88b22f478d65ce1b74e (patch) | |
tree | 3d51bea7e9bd8d5bf0ff483fb2e49fe9db962092 | |
parent | 88eda2f2f430e2f3b7e580fe38ac31e4c5fac942 (diff) | |
download | numpy-7fb0b02df1ca5b388f81f88b22f478d65ce1b74e.tar.gz |
DOC: Remove CoC pages from Sphinx
code_of_conduct.rst and report_handling_manual.rst duplicate
pages now on Hugo.
-rw-r--r-- | doc/source/dev/conduct/code_of_conduct.rst | 163 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | doc/source/dev/conduct/report_handling_manual.rst | 220 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | doc/source/dev/index.rst | 2 |
3 files changed, 0 insertions, 385 deletions
diff --git a/doc/source/dev/conduct/code_of_conduct.rst b/doc/source/dev/conduct/code_of_conduct.rst deleted file mode 100644 index f2f0a536d..000000000 --- a/doc/source/dev/conduct/code_of_conduct.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,163 +0,0 @@ -NumPy Code of Conduct -===================== - - -Introduction ------------- - -This code of conduct applies to all spaces managed by the NumPy project, -including all public and private mailing lists, issue trackers, wikis, blogs, -Twitter, and any other communication channel used by our community. The NumPy -project does not organise in-person events, however events related to our -community should have a code of conduct similar in spirit to this one. - -This code of conduct should be honored by everyone who participates in -the NumPy community formally or informally, or claims any affiliation with the -project, in any project-related activities and especially when representing the -project, in any role. - -This code is not exhaustive or complete. It serves to distill our common -understanding of a collaborative, shared environment and goals. Please try to -follow this code in spirit as much as in letter, to create a friendly and -productive environment that enriches the surrounding community. - - -Specific Guidelines -------------------- - -We strive to: - -1. Be open. We invite anyone to participate in our community. We prefer to use - public methods of communication for project-related messages, unless - discussing something sensitive. This applies to messages for help or - project-related support, too; not only is a public support request much more - likely to result in an answer to a question, it also ensures that any - inadvertent mistakes in answering are more easily detected and corrected. - -2. Be empathetic, welcoming, friendly, and patient. We work together to resolve - conflict, and assume good intentions. We may all experience some frustration - from time to time, but we do not allow frustration to turn into a personal - attack. A community where people feel uncomfortable or threatened is not a - productive one. - -3. Be collaborative. Our work will be used by other people, and in turn we will - depend on the work of others. When we make something for the benefit of the - project, we are willing to explain to others how it works, so that they can - build on the work to make it even better. Any decision we make will affect - users and colleagues, and we take those consequences seriously when making - decisions. - -4. Be inquisitive. Nobody knows everything! Asking questions early avoids many - problems later, so we encourage questions, although we may direct them to - the appropriate forum. We will try hard to be responsive and helpful. - -5. Be careful in the words that we choose. We are careful and respectful in - our communication and we take responsibility for our own speech. Be kind to - others. Do not insult or put down other participants. We will not accept - harassment or other exclusionary behaviour, such as: - - - Violent threats or language directed against another person. - - Sexist, racist, or otherwise discriminatory jokes and language. - - Posting sexually explicit or violent material. - - Posting (or threatening to post) other people's personally identifying information ("doxing"). - - Sharing private content, such as emails sent privately or non-publicly, - or unlogged forums such as IRC channel history, without the sender's consent. - - Personal insults, especially those using racist or sexist terms. - - Unwelcome sexual attention. - - Excessive profanity. Please avoid swearwords; people differ greatly in their sensitivity to swearing. - - Repeated harassment of others. In general, if someone asks you to stop, then stop. - - Advocating for, or encouraging, any of the above behaviour. - - -Diversity Statement -------------------- - -The NumPy project welcomes and encourages participation by everyone. We are -committed to being a community that everyone enjoys being part of. Although -we may not always be able to accommodate each individual's preferences, we try -our best to treat everyone kindly. - -No matter how you identify yourself or how others perceive you: we welcome you. -Though no list can hope to be comprehensive, we explicitly honour diversity in: -age, culture, ethnicity, genotype, gender identity or expression, language, -national origin, neurotype, phenotype, political beliefs, profession, race, -religion, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, subculture and technical -ability, to the extent that these do not conflict with this code of conduct. - - -Though we welcome people fluent in all languages, NumPy development is -conducted in English. - -Standards for behaviour in the NumPy community are detailed in the Code of -Conduct above. Participants in our community should uphold these standards -in all their interactions and help others to do so as well (see next section). - - -Reporting Guidelines --------------------- - -We know that it is painfully common for internet communication to start at or -devolve into obvious and flagrant abuse. We also recognize that sometimes -people may have a bad day, or be unaware of some of the guidelines in this Code -of Conduct. Please keep this in mind when deciding on how to respond to a -breach of this Code. - -For clearly intentional breaches, report those to the Code of Conduct committee -(see below). For possibly unintentional breaches, you may reply to the person -and point out this code of conduct (either in public or in private, whatever is -most appropriate). If you would prefer not to do that, please feel free to -report to the Code of Conduct Committee directly, or ask the Committee for -advice, in confidence. - -You can report issues to the NumPy Code of Conduct committee, at -numpy-conduct@googlegroups.com. Currently, the committee consists of: - -- Stefan van der Walt -- Melissa Weber Mendonça -- Anirudh Subramanian - -If your report involves any members of the committee, or if they feel they have -a conflict of interest in handling it, then they will recuse themselves from -considering your report. Alternatively, if for any reason you feel -uncomfortable making a report to the committee, then you can also contact: - -- Senior `NumFOCUS staff <https://numfocus.org/code-of-conduct#persons-responsible>`__: conduct@numfocus.org - - -Incident reporting resolution & Code of Conduct enforcement ------------------------------------------------------------ - -*This section summarizes the most important points, more details can be found -in* :ref:`CoC_reporting_manual`. - -We will investigate and respond to all complaints. The NumPy Code of Conduct -Committee and the NumPy Steering Committee (if involved) will protect the -identity of the reporter, and treat the content of complaints as confidential -(unless the reporter agrees otherwise). - -In case of severe and obvious breaches, e.g. personal threat or violent, sexist -or racist language, we will immediately disconnect the originator from NumPy -communication channels; please see the manual for details. - -In cases not involving clear severe and obvious breaches of this code of -conduct, the process for acting on any received code of conduct violation -report will be: - -1. acknowledge report is received -2. reasonable discussion/feedback -3. mediation (if feedback didn't help, and only if both reporter and reportee agree to this) -4. enforcement via transparent decision (see :ref:`CoC_resolutions`) by the - Code of Conduct Committee - -The committee will respond to any report as soon as possible, and at most -within 72 hours. - - -Endnotes --------- - -We are thankful to the groups behind the following documents, from which we -drew content and inspiration: - -- `The SciPy Code of Conduct <https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/dev/conduct/code_of_conduct.html>`_ - diff --git a/doc/source/dev/conduct/report_handling_manual.rst b/doc/source/dev/conduct/report_handling_manual.rst deleted file mode 100644 index d39b615bb..000000000 --- a/doc/source/dev/conduct/report_handling_manual.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,220 +0,0 @@ -:orphan: - -.. _CoC_reporting_manual: - -NumPy Code of Conduct - How to follow up on a report ----------------------------------------------------- - -This is the manual followed by NumPy's Code of Conduct Committee. It's used -when we respond to an issue to make sure we're consistent and fair. - -Enforcing the Code of Conduct impacts our community today and for the future. -It's an action that we do not take lightly. When reviewing enforcement -measures, the Code of Conduct Committee will keep the following values and -guidelines in mind: - -* Act in a personal manner rather than impersonal. The Committee can engage - the parties to understand the situation, while respecting the privacy and any - necessary confidentiality of reporters. However, sometimes it is necessary - to communicate with one or more individuals directly: the Committee's goal is - to improve the health of our community rather than only produce a formal - decision. - -* Emphasize empathy for individuals rather than judging behavior, avoiding - binary labels of "good" and "bad/evil". Overt, clear-cut aggression and - harassment exists and we will be address that firmly. But many scenarios - that can prove challenging to resolve are those where normal disagreements - devolve into unhelpful or harmful behavior from multiple parties. - Understanding the full context and finding a path that re-engages all is - hard, but ultimately the most productive for our community. - -* We understand that email is a difficult medium and can be isolating. - Receiving criticism over email, without personal contact, can be - particularly painful. This makes it especially important to keep an - atmosphere of open-minded respect of the views of others. It also means - that we must be transparent in our actions, and that we will do everything - in our power to make sure that all our members are treated fairly and with - sympathy. - -* Discrimination can be subtle and it can be unconscious. It can show itself - as unfairness and hostility in otherwise ordinary interactions. We know - that this does occur, and we will take care to look out for it. We would - very much like to hear from you if you feel you have been treated unfairly, - and we will use these procedures to make sure that your complaint is heard - and addressed. - -* Help increase engagement in good discussion practice: try to identify where - discussion may have broken down and provide actionable information, pointers - and resources that can lead to positive change on these points. - -* Be mindful of the needs of new members: provide them with explicit support - and consideration, with the aim of increasing participation from - underrepresented groups in particular. - -* Individuals come from different cultural backgrounds and native languages. - Try to identify any honest misunderstandings caused by a non-native speaker - and help them understand the issue and what they can change to avoid causing - offence. Complex discussion in a foreign language can be very intimidating, - and we want to grow our diversity also across nationalities and cultures. - -*Mediation*: voluntary, informal mediation is a tool at our disposal. In -contexts such as when two or more parties have all escalated to the point of -inappropriate behavior (something sadly common in human conflict), it may be -useful to facilitate a mediation process. This is only an example: the -Committee can consider mediation in any case, mindful that the process is meant -to be strictly voluntary and no party can be pressured to participate. If the -Committee suggests mediation, it should: - -* Find a candidate who can serve as a mediator. -* Obtain the agreement of the reporter(s). The reporter(s) have complete - freedom to decline the mediation idea, or to propose an alternate mediator. -* Obtain the agreement of the reported person(s). -* Settle on the mediator: while parties can propose a different mediator than - the suggested candidate, only if common agreement is reached on all terms can - the process move forward. -* Establish a timeline for mediation to complete, ideally within two weeks. - -The mediator will engage with all the parties and seek a resolution that is -satisfactory to all. Upon completion, the mediator will provide a report -(vetted by all parties to the process) to the Committee, with recommendations -on further steps. The Committee will then evaluate these results (whether -satisfactory resolution was achieved or not) and decide on any additional -action deemed necessary. - - -How the committee will respond to reports -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - -When the committee (or a committee member) receives a report, they will first -determine whether the report is about a clear and severe breach (as defined -below). If so, immediate action needs to be taken in addition to the regular -report handling process. - -Clear and severe breach actions -+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ - -We know that it is painfully common for internet communication to start at or -devolve into obvious and flagrant abuse. We will deal quickly with clear and -severe breaches like personal threats, violent, sexist or racist language. - -When a member of the Code of Conduct committee becomes aware of a clear and -severe breach, they will do the following: - -* Immediately disconnect the originator from all NumPy communication channels. -* Reply to the reporter that their report has been received and that the - originator has been disconnected. -* In every case, the moderator should make a reasonable effort to contact the - originator, and tell them specifically how their language or actions - qualify as a "clear and severe breach". The moderator should also say - that, if the originator believes this is unfair or they want to be - reconnected to NumPy, they have the right to ask for a review, as below, by - the Code of Conduct Committee. - The moderator should copy this explanation to the Code of Conduct Committee. -* The Code of Conduct Committee will formally review and sign off on all cases - where this mechanism has been applied to make sure it is not being used to - control ordinary heated disagreement. - -Report handling -+++++++++++++++ - -When a report is sent to the committee they will immediately reply to the -reporter to confirm receipt. This reply must be sent within 72 hours, and the -group should strive to respond much quicker than that. - -If a report doesn't contain enough information, the committee will obtain all -relevant data before acting. The committee is empowered to act on the Steering -Council’s behalf in contacting any individuals involved to get a more complete -account of events. - -The committee will then review the incident and determine, to the best of their -ability: - -* What happened. -* Whether this event constitutes a Code of Conduct violation. -* Who are the responsible party(ies). -* Whether this is an ongoing situation, and there is a threat to anyone's - physical safety. - -This information will be collected in writing, and whenever possible the -group's deliberations will be recorded and retained (i.e. chat transcripts, -email discussions, recorded conference calls, summaries of voice conversations, -etc). - -It is important to retain an archive of all activities of this committee to -ensure consistency in behavior and provide institutional memory for the -project. To assist in this, the default channel of discussion for this -committee will be a private mailing list accessible to current and future -members of the committee as well as members of the Steering Council upon -justified request. If the Committee finds the need to use off-list -communications (e.g. phone calls for early/rapid response), it should in all -cases summarize these back to the list so there's a good record of the process. - -The Code of Conduct Committee should aim to have a resolution agreed upon within -two weeks. In the event that a resolution can't be determined in that time, the -committee will respond to the reporter(s) with an update and projected timeline -for resolution. - - -.. _CoC_resolutions: - -Resolutions -~~~~~~~~~~~ - -The committee must agree on a resolution by consensus. If the group cannot reach -consensus and deadlocks for over a week, the group will turn the matter over to -the Steering Council for resolution. - - -Possible responses may include: - -* Taking no further action - - - if we determine no violations have occurred. - - if the matter has been resolved publicly while the committee was considering responses. - -* Coordinating voluntary mediation: if all involved parties agree, the - Committee may facilitate a mediation process as detailed above. -* Remind publicly, and point out that some behavior/actions/language have been - judged inappropriate and why in the current context, or can but hurtful to - some people, requesting the community to self-adjust. -* A private reprimand from the committee to the individual(s) involved. In this - case, the group chair will deliver that reprimand to the individual(s) over - email, cc'ing the group. -* A public reprimand. In this case, the committee chair will deliver that - reprimand in the same venue that the violation occurred, within the limits of - practicality. E.g., the original mailing list for an email violation, but - for a chat room discussion where the person/context may be gone, they can be - reached by other means. The group may choose to publish this message - elsewhere for documentation purposes. -* A request for a public or private apology, assuming the reporter agrees to - this idea: they may at their discretion refuse further contact with the - violator. The chair will deliver this request. The committee may, if it - chooses, attach "strings" to this request: for example, the group may ask a - violator to apologize in order to retain one’s membership on a mailing list. -* A "mutually agreed upon hiatus" where the committee asks the individual to - temporarily refrain from community participation. If the individual chooses - not to take a temporary break voluntarily, the committee may issue a - "mandatory cooling off period". -* A permanent or temporary ban from some or all NumPy spaces (mailing lists, - gitter.im, etc.). The group will maintain records of all such bans so that - they may be reviewed in the future or otherwise maintained. - -Once a resolution is agreed upon, but before it is enacted, the committee will -contact the original reporter and any other affected parties and explain the -proposed resolution. The committee will ask if this resolution is acceptable, -and must note feedback for the record. - -Finally, the committee will make a report to the NumPy Steering Council (as -well as the NumPy core team in the event of an ongoing resolution, such as a -ban). - -The committee will never publicly discuss the issue; all public statements will -be made by the chair of the Code of Conduct Committee or the NumPy Steering -Council. - - -Conflicts of Interest -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - -In the event of any conflict of interest, a committee member must immediately -notify the other members, and recuse themselves if necessary. diff --git a/doc/source/dev/index.rst b/doc/source/dev/index.rst index c4f35b68f..020df0b2b 100644 --- a/doc/source/dev/index.rst +++ b/doc/source/dev/index.rst @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ Contributing to NumPy .. toctree:: :hidden: - conduct/code_of_conduct Git Basics <gitwash/index> development_environment development_workflow @@ -293,7 +292,6 @@ The rest of the story .. toctree:: :maxdepth: 2 - conduct/code_of_conduct Git Basics <gitwash/index> development_environment development_workflow |