Guido pointed out that these docs were wrong.

2 files changed, 4 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/doc/branch.rst b/doc/branch.rst
index d9b6162..3ee09aa 100644
--- a/doc/branch.rst
+++ b/doc/branch.rst
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ Branch coverage measurement
 :history: 20091127T201300, new for version 3.2
 :history: 20100725T211700, updated for 3.4.
 :history: 20110604T181700, updated for 3.5.
+:history: 20111214T181800, Fix a bug that Guido pointed out.
 
 .. highlight:: python
    :linenothreshold: 5
@@ -109,12 +110,12 @@ tell coverage.py that you don't want them flagged by marking them with a
 pragma::
 
     i = 0
-    while i < 999999999:    # pragma: no partial
+    while i < 999999999:    # pragma: no branch
         if eventually():
             break
 
 Here the while loop will never complete because the break will always be taken
 at some point.  Coverage.py can't work that out on its own, but the
-"no partial" pragma indicates that the branch is known to be partial, and
+"no branch" pragma indicates that the branch is known to be partial, and
 the line is not flagged.
 
diff --git a/doc/excluding.rst b/doc/excluding.rst
index 9a3b5e7..f1262c3 100644
--- a/doc/excluding.rst
+++ b/doc/excluding.rst
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ Note that when using the ``exclude_lines`` option in a configuration file, you
 are taking control of the entire list of regexes, so you need to re-specify the
 default "pragma: no cover" match if you still want it to apply.
 
-A similar pragma, "no partial", can be used to tailor branch coverage
+A similar pragma, "no branch", can be used to tailor branch coverage
 measurement.  See :ref:`branch` for details.