diff options
| author | Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> | 2009-11-28 07:38:09 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> | 2009-11-28 07:38:09 -0500 |
| commit | f80837ae0385019de7b9a3d50a286a5fce0dfb46 (patch) | |
| tree | 1be804a75a7ce8a83371141d25b03cc43da68856 /doc/excluding.rst | |
| parent | b2cf3b8d1f1908c3d9732387346f038f84cc6ca0 (diff) | |
| download | python-coveragepy-git-f80837ae0385019de7b9a3d50a286a5fce0dfb46.tar.gz | |
Doc tweaking.
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/excluding.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/excluding.rst | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/excluding.rst b/doc/excluding.rst index 1072e5b1..31aa6838 100644 --- a/doc/excluding.rst +++ b/doc/excluding.rst @@ -39,6 +39,24 @@ coverage data as usual. When producing reports though, coverage excludes it from the list of missing code. +Branch coverage +--------------- + +When measuring :ref:`branch coverage <branch>`, a condtional will not be +counted as a branch if one of its choices is excluded:: + + def only_one_choice(x): + if x: + blah1() + blah2() + else: # pragma: no cover + # x is always true. + blah3() + +Because the ``else`` clause is excluded, the ``if`` only has one possible +next line, so it isn't considered a branch at all. + + Advanced exclusion ------------------ @@ -64,3 +82,4 @@ Here's a list of exclusions I've used:: coverage.exclude('if 0:') coverage.exclude('if __name__ == .__main__.:') + |
