diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c | 36 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c index 29b9c19f0e..a137d18857 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c @@ -29,23 +29,23 @@ * * If we successfully complete the transaction, we have to broadcast all * these invalidation events to other backends (via the SI message queue) - * so that they can flush obsolete entries from their caches. Note we have + * so that they can flush obsolete entries from their caches. Note we have * to record the transaction commit before sending SI messages, otherwise * the other backends won't see our updated tuples as good. * * When a subtransaction aborts, we can process and discard any events - * it has queued. When a subtransaction commits, we just add its events + * it has queued. When a subtransaction commits, we just add its events * to the pending lists of the parent transaction. * * In short, we need to remember until xact end every insert or delete - * of a tuple that might be in the system caches. Updates are treated as + * of a tuple that might be in the system caches. Updates are treated as * two events, delete + insert, for simplicity. (There are cases where * it'd be possible to record just one event, but we don't currently try.) * * We do not need to register EVERY tuple operation in this way, just those - * on tuples in relations that have associated catcaches. We do, however, + * on tuples in relations that have associated catcaches. We do, however, * have to register every operation on every tuple that *could* be in a - * catcache, whether or not it currently is in our cache. Also, if the + * catcache, whether or not it currently is in our cache. Also, if the * tuple is in a relation that has multiple catcaches, we need to register * an invalidation message for each such catcache. catcache.c's * PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple() routine provides the knowledge of which @@ -53,10 +53,10 @@ * * Also, whenever we see an operation on a pg_class or pg_attribute tuple, * we register a relcache flush operation for the relation described by that - * tuple. pg_class updates trigger an smgr flush operation as well. + * tuple. pg_class updates trigger an smgr flush operation as well. * * We keep the relcache and smgr flush requests in lists separate from the - * catcache tuple flush requests. This allows us to issue all the pending + * catcache tuple flush requests. This allows us to issue all the pending * catcache flushes before we issue relcache flushes, which saves us from * loading a catcache tuple during relcache load only to flush it again * right away. Also, we avoid queuing multiple relcache flush requests for @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ /* * To minimize palloc traffic, we keep pending requests in successively- * larger chunks (a slightly more sophisticated version of an expansible - * array). All request types can be stored as SharedInvalidationMessage + * array). All request types can be stored as SharedInvalidationMessage * records. The ordering of requests within a list is never significant. */ typedef struct InvalidationChunk @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ PrepareForTupleInvalidation(Relation relation, HeapTuple tuple) * Note: during a pg_class row update that assigns a new relfilenode * or reltablespace value, we will be called on both the old and new * tuples, and thus will broadcast invalidation messages showing both - * the old and new RelFileNode values. This ensures that other + * the old and new RelFileNode values. This ensures that other * backends will close smgr references to the old file. * * XXX possible future cleanup: it might be better to trigger smgr @@ -650,7 +650,7 @@ PrepareForTupleInvalidation(Relation relation, HeapTuple tuple) * This essentially means that only backends in this same database * will react to the relcache flush request. This is in fact * appropriate, since only those backends could see our pg_attribute - * change anyway. It looks a bit ugly though. (In practice, shared + * change anyway. It looks a bit ugly though. (In practice, shared * relations can't have schema changes after bootstrap, so we should * never come here for a shared rel anyway.) */ @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ PrepareForTupleInvalidation(Relation relation, HeapTuple tuple) /* * When a pg_index row is updated, we should send out a relcache inval - * for the index relation. As above, we don't know the shared status + * for the index relation. As above, we don't know the shared status * of the index, but in practice it doesn't matter since indexes of * shared catalogs can't have such updates. */ @@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ AcceptInvalidationMessages(void) * * If you're a glutton for punishment, try CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY. This * slows things by at least a factor of 10000, so I wouldn't suggest - * trying to run the entire regression tests that way. It's useful to try + * trying to run the entire regression tests that way. It's useful to try * a few simple tests, to make sure that cache reload isn't subject to * internal cache-flush hazards, but after you've done a few thousand * recursive reloads it's unlikely you'll learn more. @@ -859,12 +859,12 @@ inval_twophase_postcommit(TransactionId xid, uint16 info, * If isCommit, we must send out the messages in our PriorCmdInvalidMsgs list * to the shared invalidation message queue. Note that these will be read * not only by other backends, but also by our own backend at the next - * transaction start (via AcceptInvalidationMessages). This means that + * transaction start (via AcceptInvalidationMessages). This means that * we can skip immediate local processing of anything that's still in * CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs, and just send that list out too. * * If not isCommit, we are aborting, and must locally process the messages - * in PriorCmdInvalidMsgs. No messages need be sent to other backends, + * in PriorCmdInvalidMsgs. No messages need be sent to other backends, * since they'll not have seen our changed tuples anyway. We can forget * about CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs too, since those changes haven't touched * the caches yet. @@ -923,11 +923,11 @@ AtEOXact_Inval(bool isCommit) * parent's PriorCmdInvalidMsgs list. * * If not isCommit, we are aborting, and must locally process the messages - * in PriorCmdInvalidMsgs. No messages need be sent to other backends. + * in PriorCmdInvalidMsgs. No messages need be sent to other backends. * We can forget about CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs too, since those changes haven't * touched the caches yet. * - * In any case, pop the transaction stack. We need not physically free memory + * In any case, pop the transaction stack. We need not physically free memory * here, since CurTransactionContext is about to be emptied anyway * (if aborting). Beware of the possibility of aborting the same nesting * level twice, though. @@ -983,7 +983,7 @@ AtEOSubXact_Inval(bool isCommit) * in a transaction. * * Here, we send no messages to the shared queue, since we don't know yet if - * we will commit. We do need to locally process the CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs + * we will commit. We do need to locally process the CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs * list, so as to flush our caches of any entries we have outdated in the * current command. We then move the current-cmd list over to become part * of the prior-cmds list. @@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ CommandEndInvalidationMessages(void) * Prepare for invalidation messages for nontransactional updates. * * A nontransactional invalidation is one that must be sent whether or not - * the current transaction eventually commits. We arrange for all invals + * the current transaction eventually commits. We arrange for all invals * queued between this call and EndNonTransactionalInvalidation() to be sent * immediately when the latter is called. * |