| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
| |
into 'master'"
This reverts merge request !75
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way an authorization rule can do this
return polkit.Result.YES;
which is slightly nicer than
return "yes";
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50983
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <zeuthen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This also removes the ability to change detail parameters which is
actually a good thing. If we later need a way to change the
authentication message, we can always add something like
polkit.addAuthenticationMessageRule() so the user can register a
function returning a string.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
|
|
|
In fact, this test uncovered that we were evaluating the rules in the
wrong order. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
|
