1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
|
#!./perl
BEGIN {
chdir 't' if -d 't';
@INC = '../lib';
}
use Test::More tests => 11;
# these two should be kept in sync with the pragma itself
# if hint bits are changed there, other things *will* break
my $hint_bits = 0x00400000;
my $error = "filetest: the only implemented subpragma is 'access'.\n";
# can't use it yet, because of the import death
ok( require filetest, 'required pragma successfully' );
# and here's one culprit, right here
eval { filetest->import('bad subpragma') };
is( $@, $error, 'filetest dies with bad subpragma on import' );
is( $^H & $hint_bits, 0, 'hint bits not set without pragma in place' );
# now try the normal usage
# can't check $^H here; it's lexically magic (see perlvar)
# the test harness unintentionally hoards the goodies for itself
use_ok( 'filetest', 'access' );
# and import again, to see it here
filetest->import('access');
ok( $^H & $hint_bits, 'hint bits set with pragma loaded' );
# and now get rid of it
filetest->unimport('access');
is( $^H & $hint_bits, 0, 'hint bits not set with pragma unimported' );
eval { filetest->unimport() };
is( $@, $error, 'filetest dies without subpragma on unimport' );
# there'll be a compilation aborted failure here, with the eval string
eval "no filetest 'fake pragma'";
like( $@, qr/^$error/, 'filetest dies with bad subpragma on unuse' );
eval "use filetest 'bad subpragma'";
like( $@, qr/^$error/, 'filetest dies with bad subpragma on use' );
eval "use filetest";
like( $@, qr/^$error/, 'filetest dies with missing subpragma on use' );
eval "no filetest";
like( $@, qr/^$error/, 'filetest dies with missing subpragma on unuse' );
|
