| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
| |
PR: 2791
Submitted by: Ben Noordhuis
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Submitted by: Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.de>
Reviewed by: steve
Call ssl_new() to reallocate SSL BIO internals if we want to replace
the existing internal SSL structure.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
("perl util/ck_errf.pl */*.c */*/*.c" still reports many more.)
|
| |
|
|
| |
Avoid more shadow warnings.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
PR: 358
|
| |
|
|
| |
PR: 364
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is mostly a work around for the old VC++ problem
that it treats func() as func(void).
Various prototypes had been added to 'compare' function
pointers that triggered this. This could be fixed by removing
the prototype, adding function pointer casts to every call or
changing the passed function to use the expected arguments.
I mostly did the latter.
The mkdef.pl script was modified to remove the typesafe
functions which no longer exist.
Oh and some functions called OPENSSL_freeLibrary() were
changed back to FreeLibrary(), wonder how that happened :-)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
like Malloc, Realloc and especially Free conflict with already existing names
on some operating systems or other packages. That is reason enough to change
the names of the OpenSSL memory allocation macros to something that has a
better chance of being unique, like prepending them with OPENSSL_.
This change includes all the name changes needed throughout all C files.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
designed for that. This removes the potential error to mix data and
function pointers.
Please note that I'm a little unsure how incorrect calls to the old
ctrl functions should be handled, in som cases. I currently return 0
and that's it, but it may be more correct to generate a genuine error
in those cases.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
non-function pointers to function pointers and vice versa.
The current solution is to have unions that describe the
conversion we want to do, and gives us the ability to extract
the type of data we want.
The current solution is a quick fix, and can probably be made
in a more general or elegant way.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
PR:
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
