| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"Trigger fired multiple times leads to gaps in auto_increment sequence".
The bug was that if a trigger fired multiple times inside a top
statement (for example top-statement is a multi-row INSERT,
and trigger is ON INSERT), and that trigger inserted into an auto_increment
column, then gaps could be observed in the auto_increment sequence,
even if there were no other users of the database (no concurrency).
It was wrong usage of THD::auto_inc_intervals_in_cur_stmt_for_binlog.
Note that the fix changes "class handler", I'll tell the Storage Engine API team.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In cases when TRUNCATE was executed by invoking mysql_delete() rather
than by table recreation (for example, when TRUNCATE was issued on
InnoDB table with is referenced by foreign key) triggers were invoked.
In debug builds this also led to crash because of an assertion, which
assumes that some preliminary actions take place before trigger
invocation, which doesn't happen in case of TRUNCATE.
The fix is not to execute triggers in mysql_delete() when this
function is used by TRUNCATE.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
causes full table lock on innodb table.
Also fixes Bug#28502 Triggers that update another innodb table
will block on X lock unnecessarily (duplciate).
Code review fixes.
Both bugs' synopses are misleading: InnoDB table is
not X locked. The statements, however, cannot proceed concurrently,
but this happens due to lock conflicts for tables used in triggers,
not for the InnoDB table.
If a user had an InnoDB table, and two triggers, AFTER UPDATE and
AFTER INSERT, competing for different resources (e.g. two distinct
MyISAM tables), then these two triggers would not be able to execute
concurrently. Moreover, INSERTS/UPDATES of the InnoDB table would
not be able to run concurrently.
The problem had other side-effects (see respective bug reports).
This behavior was a consequence of a shortcoming of the pre-locking
algorithm, which would not distinguish between different DML operations
(e.g. INSERT and DELETE) and pre-lock all the tables
that are used by any trigger defined on the subject table.
The idea of the fix is to extend the pre-locking algorithm to keep track,
for each table, what DML operation it is used for and not
load triggers that are known to never be fired.
|
|
|
triggers".
Applying ALTER/OPTIMIZE/REPAIR TABLE statements to transactional table or to
table of any type on Windows caused disappearance of its triggers.
Bug was introduced in 5.0.19 by my fix for bug #13525 "Rename table does not
keep info of triggers" (see comment for sql_table.cc for more info).
.
|
