| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\ |
|
| | |\ |
|
| | |\ \
| | |/ |
|
| | | |\ |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
CONNECTIONS IF SPE
Problem description: -ssl-key value is not validated, you can assign any bogus
text to --ssl-key and it is not verified that it exists, and more importantly,
it allows the client to connect to mysqld.
Fix: Added proper validations checks for --ssl-key.
Note:
1) Documentation changes require for 5.1, 5.5, 5.6 and trunk in the sections
listed below and the details are :
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/ssl-options.html#option_general_ssl
and
REQUIRE SSL section of
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/grant.html
2) Client having with option '--ssl', should able to get ssl connection. This
will be implemented as part of separate fix in 5.6 and trunk.
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
"ORDER BY" AND "LIMIT BY" CLAUSE
PROBLEM:
When a 'limit' clause is specified in a query along with
group by and order by, optimizer chooses wrong index
there by examining more number of rows than required.
However without the 'limit' clause, optimizer chooses
the right index.
ANALYSIS:
With respect to the query specified, range optimizer chooses
the first index as there is a range present ( on 'a'). Optimizer
then checks for an index which would give records in sorted
order for the 'group by' clause.
While checking chooses the second index (on 'c,b,a') based on
the 'limit' specified and the selectivity of
'quick_condition_rows' (number of rows present in the range)
in 'test_if_skip_sort_order' function.
But, it fails to consider that an order by clause on a
different column will result in scanning the entire index and
hence the estimated number of rows calculated above are
wrong (which results in choosing the second index).
FIX:
Do not enforce the 'limit' clause in the call to
'test_if_skip_sort_order' if we are creating a temporary
table. Creation of temporary table indicates that there would be
more post-processing and hence will need all the rows.
This fix is backported from 5.6. This problem is fixed in 5.6 as
part of changes for work log #5558
mysql-test/r/subselect.result:
Changes for Bug#11762052 results in the correct number of rows.
sql/sql_select.cc:
Do not pass the actual 'limit' value if 'need_tmp' is true.
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
If, when executing a query with ORDER BY col LIMIT n, the optimizer chose
an index-merge scan to access the table containing col while there existed
an index defined over col then optimizer did not consider the possibility
of using an alternative range scan by this index to avoid filesort. This
could cause a performance degradation if the optimizer flag index_merge was
set up to 'on'.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / /
|/| / / /
| |/ / / |
|
| | |\ \ \
| | |/ / |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
ha_maria::check_if_incompatible_data on
mysql-test/r/partition.result:
Added test case
mysql-test/t/partition.test:
Added test case
sql/ha_partition.cc:
Removed printing of not initialized variable
storage/maria/ha_maria.cc:
Don't copy variables that are not initialized
|
| | | |\ \ |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Empty result after reading const tables now works for subqueries.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
and the key is NULL
Check ability of index to be NULL as it made in MyISAM. UNIQUE with NULL could have several NULL entries so we have to continue even if ve have found a row.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Find left table in right join (which turned to left join by reordering tables in join list but phisical order of tables of SELECT left as it was).
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
.. into MariaDB 5.3
Fix for Bug#12667154 SAME QUERY EXEC AS WHERE SUBQ GIVES DIFFERENT
RESULTS ON IN() & NOT IN() COMP #3
This bug causes a wrong result in mysql-trunk when ICP is used
and bad performance in mysql-5.5 and mysql-trunk.
Using the query from bug report to explain what happens and causes
the wrong result from the query when ICP is enabled:
1. The t3 table contains four records. The outer query will read
these and for each of these it will execute the subquery.
2. Before the first execution of the subquery it will be optimized. In
this case the important is what happens to the first table t1:
-make_join_select() will call the range optimizer which decides
that t1 should be accessed using a range scan on the k1 index
It creates a QUICK_RANGE_SELECT object for this.
-As the last part of optimization the ICP code pushes the
condition down to the storage engine for table t1 on the k1 index.
This produces the following information in the explain for this table:
2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t1 range k1 k1 5 NULL 3 Using index condition; Using filesort
Note the use of filesort.
3. The first execution of the subquery does (among other things) due
to the need for sorting:
a. Call create_sort_index() which again will call find_all_keys():
b. find_all_keys() will read the required keys for all qualifying
rows from the storage engine. To do this it checks if it has a
quick-select for the table. It will use the quick-select for
reading records. In this case it will read four records from the
storage engine (based on the range criteria). The storage engine
will evaluate the pushed index condition for each record.
c. At the end of create_sort_index() there is code that cleans up a
lot of stuff on the join tab. One of the things that is cleaned
is the select object. The result of this is that the
quick-select object created in make_join_select is deleted.
4. The second execution of the subquery does the same as the first but
the result is different:
a. Call create_sort_index() which again will call find_all_keys()
(same as for the first execution)
b. find_all_keys() will read the keys from the storage engine. To
do this it checks if it has a quick-select for the table. Now
there is NO quick-select object(!) (since it was deleted in
step 3c). So find_all_keys defaults to read the table using a
table scan instead. So instead of reading the four relevant records
in the range it reads the entire table (6 records). It then
evaluates the table's condition (and here it goes wrong). Since
the entire condition has been pushed down to the storage engine
using ICP all 6 records qualify. (Note that the storage engine
will not evaluate the pushed index condition in this case since
it was pushed for the k1 index and now we do a table scan
without any index being used).
The result is that here we return six qualifying key values
instead of four due to not evaluating the table's condition.
c. As above.
5. The two last execution of the subquery will also produce wrong results
for the same reason.
Summary: The problem occurs due to all but the first executions of the
subquery is done as a table scan without evaluating the table's
condition (which is pushed to the storage engine on a different
index). This is caused by the create_sort_index() function deleting
the quick-select object that should have been used for executing the
subquery as a range scan.
Note that this bug in addition to causing wrong results also can
result in bad performance due to executing the subquery using a table
scan instead of a range scan. This is an issue in MySQL 5.5.
The fix for this problem is to avoid that the Quick-select-object that
the optimizer created is deleted when create_sort_index() is doing
clean-up of the join-tab. This will ensure that the quick-select
object and the corresponding pushed index condition will be available
and used by all following executions of the subquery.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
The problem was in incorrect detection of merged views in tem_direct_view_ref::used_tables() .
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
In some rare cases when the value of the system variable join_buffer_size
was set to a number less than 256 the function JOIN_CACHE::set_constants
determined the size of an offset in the join buffer equal to 1 though
the minimal join buffer required more than 256 bytes. This could cause
a crash of the server when records from the join buffer were read.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
The feature was backported from MySQL 5.6.
Some code was added to make commands as
SELECT * FROM ignored_db.t1;
CALL ignored_db.proc();
USE ignored_db;
to take that option into account.
per-file comments:
mysql-test/r/ignore_db_dirs_basic.result
test result added.
mysql-test/t/ignore_db_dirs_basic-master.opt
options for the test,
actually the set of --ignore-db-dir lines.
mysql-test/t/ignore_db_dirs_basic.test
test for the feature.
Same test from 5.6 was taken as a basis,
then tests for SELECT, CALL etc were added.
per-file comments:
sql/mysql_priv.h
MDEV-495 backport --ignore-db-dir.
interface for db_name_is_in_ignore_list() added.
sql/mysqld.cc
MDEV-495 backport --ignore-db-dir.
--ignore-db-dir handling.
sql/set_var.cc
MDEV-495 backport --ignore-db-dir.
the @@ignore_db_dirs variable added.
sql/sql_show.cc
MDEV-495 backport --ignore-db-dir.
check if the directory is ignored.
sql/sql_show.h
MDEV-495 backport --ignore-db-dir.
interface added for opt_ignored_db_dirs.
sql/table.cc
MDEV-495 backport --ignore-db-dir.
check if the directory is ignored.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
After pullout item during single row subselect transformation it should be fixed properly.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / /
| | | | |
| | | | | |
- Performed some refactoring and simplification that was enabled and required by the merge.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Analysis:
The queries in question use the [unique | index]_subquery execution methods.
These methods reuse the ref keys constructed by create_ref_for_key(). The
way create_ref_for_key() works is that it doesn't store in ref.key_copy[]
store_key elements that represent constants. In particular it doesn't store
the store_key for NULL constants.
The execution of [unique | index]_subquery calls
subselect_uniquesubquery_engine::copy_ref_key, which in addition to copy
the left IN argument into a index lookup key, is supposed to detect if
the left IN argument contains NULLs. Since the store_key for the NULL
constant is not copied into the key array, the null is not detected, and
execution erroneously proceeds as if it should look for a complete match.
Solution:
The solution (unlike MySQL) is to reuse already computed information about
NULL presence. Item_in_optimizer::val_int already finds out if the left IN
operand contains NULLs. The fix propagates this to the execution methods
subselect_[unique | index]subquery_engine::exec so it knows if there were
NULL values independent of the presence of keys.
In addition the patch siplifies copy_ref_key() and the logic that hanldes
the case of NULLs in the left IN operand.
|
| | |\ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Link view/derived table fields to a real table to check turning the table record to null row.
Item_direct_view_ref wrapper now checks if table is turned to null row.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Autointersections of an object were treated as nodes, so the wrong result.
per-file comments:
mysql-test/r/gis.result
Bug #1043845 st_distance() results are incorrect depending on variable order.
test result updated.
mysql-test/t/gis.test
Bug #1043845 st_distance() results are incorrect depending on variable order.
test case added.
sql/item.cc
small fix to make compilers happy.
sql/item_geofunc.cc
Bug #1043845 st_distance() results are incorrect depending on variable order.
Skip intersection points when calculate distance.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
store the precision in uint, not uint8
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
1. Field_newdate::get_date should refuse to return a date with zeros when
TIME_NO_ZERO_IN_DATE is set, not when TIME_FUZZY_DATE is unset
2. Item_func_to_days and Item_date_add_interval can only work with valid dates,
no zeros allowed.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
and cause troubles
fix Item_func_add_time::get_date() to generate valid dates.
Move the validity check inside get_date_from_daynr()
instead of relying on callers
(5 that had it, and 2 that did not, but should've)
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
The problem was that was_null and null_value variables was reset in each reexecution of IN subquery, but engine rerun only for non-constant subqueries.
Fixed checking constant in Item_equal sort.
Fix constant reporting in Item_subselect.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | |/ / / /
| | |/| | | | |
|
| | | |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | |_|/ /
| | | |/| | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Various places in the server replication code was incorrectly quoting
strings, which could lead to incorrect SQL on the slave/mysqlbinlog.
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | |/ / / / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / / / /
|/| | | / / /
| | |_|/ / /
| |/| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
two tests still fail:
main.innodb_icp and main.range_vs_index_merge_innodb
call records_in_range() with both range ends being open
(which triggers an assert)
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \
| | |/ / / /
| |/| | / /
| | | |/ /
| | |/| | |
increase xtradb verson from 13.0 to 13.01
|
| | | |\ \ \
| | | |/ /
| | |/| /
| | | |/ |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
YEAR(2) type"
Print the warning(note):
YEAR(x) is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Please use YEAR(4) instead
on "CREATE TABLE ... YEAR(x)" or "ALTER TABLE MODIFY ... YEAR(x)", where x != 4
|
| | | | |\ |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
CAUSES RESTORE PROBLEM
Problem Statement:
------------------
mysqldump is not having the dump stmts for general_log and slow_log
tables. That is because of the fix for Bug#26121. Hence, after
dropping the mysql database, and applying the dump by enabling the
logging, "'general_log' table not found" errors are logged into the
server log file.
Analysis:
---------
As part of the fix for Bug#26121, we skipped the dumping of tables
for general_log and slow_log, because the data dump of those tables
are taking LOCKS, which is not allowed for log tables.
Fix:
----
We came up with an approach that instead of taking both meta data
and data dump information for those tables, take only the meta data
dump which doesn't need LOCKS.
As part of fixing the issue we came up with below algorithm.
Design before fix:
1) mysql database is having tables like db, event,... general_log,
... slow_log...
2) Skip general_log and slow_log while preparing the tables list
3) Take the TL_READ lock on tables which are present in the table
list and do 'show create table'.
4) Release the lock.
Design with the fix:
1) mysql database is having tables like db, event,... general_log,
... slow_log...
2) Skip general_log and slow_log while preparing the tables list
3) Explicitly call the 'show create table' for general_log and
slow_log
3) Take the TL_READ lock on tables which are present in the table
list and do 'show create table'.
4) Release the lock.
While taking the meta data dump for general_log and slow_log the
"CREATE TABLE" is replaced with "CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS".
This is because we skipped "DROP TABLE" for those tables,
"DROP TABLE" fails for these tables if logging is enabled.
Customer is applying the dump by enabling logging so, if the dump
has "DROP TABLE" it will fail. Hence, removed the "DROP TABLE"
stmts for those tables.
After the fix we could observe "Table 'mysql.general_log'
doesn't exist" errors initially that is because in the customer
scenario they are dropping the mysql database by enabling the
logging, Hence, those errors are expected. Once we apply the
dump which is taken before the "drop database mysql", the errors
will not be there.
client/mysqldump.c:
In get_table_structure() added code to skip the DROP TABLE stmts for general_log
and slow_log tables, because when logging is enabled those stmts will fail. And
replaced CREATE TABLE with CREATE IF NOT EXISTS for those tables, just to make
sure CREATE stmt for those tables doesn't fail since we removed DROP stmts for
those tables.
In dump_all_tables_in_db() added code to call get_table_structure() for
general_log and slow_log tables.
mysql-test/r/mysqldump.result:
Added a test as part of fix for Bug #11754178
mysql-test/t/mysqldump.test:
Added a test as part of fix for Bug #11754178
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Stored program cache produces wrong result in same THD.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
ORDER BY COUNT(*) LIMIT.
PROBLEM:
With respect to problem in the bug description, we
exhibit different behaviors for the two tables
presented, because innodb statistics (rec_per_key
in this case) are updated for the first table
and not so for the second one. As a result the
query plan gets changed in test_if_skip_sort_order
to use 'index' scan. Hence the difference in the
explain output. (NOTE: We can reproduce the problem
with first table by reducing the number of tuples
and changing the table structure)
The varied output w.r.t the query on the second table
is because of the result in the query plan change.
When a query plan is changed to use 'index' scan,
after the call to test_if_skip_sort_order, we set
keyread to TRUE immedietly. If for some reason
we drop this index scan for a filesort later on,
we fetch only the keys not the entire tuple.
As a result we would see junk values in the result set.
Following is the code flow:
Call test_if_skip_sort_order
-Choose an index to give sorted output
-If this is a covering index, set_keyread to TRUE
-Set the scan to INDEX scan
Call test_if_skip_sort_order second time
-Index is not chosen (note that we do not pass the
actual limit value second time. Hence we do not choose
index scan second time which in itself is a bug fixed
in 5.6 with WL#5558)
-goto filesort
Call filesort
-Create quick range on a different index
-Since keyread is set to TRUE, we fetch only the columns of
the index
-results in the required columns are not fetched
FIX:
Remove the call to set_keyread(TRUE) from
test_if_skip_sort_order. The access function which is
'join_read_first' or 'join_read_last' calls set_keyread anyways.
mysql-test/r/func_group_innodb.result:
Added test result for Bug#12713907
mysql-test/t/func_group_innodb.test:
Added test case for Bug#12713907
sql/sql_select.cc:
Remove the call to set_keyread as we do it from access
functions 'join_read_first' and 'join_read_last'
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
We set correct cmp_context during preparation to avoid changing it later by Item_field::equal_fields_propagator.
(see mysql bugs #57135 #57692 during merging)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
The bug could caused a crash when the server executed a query with
ORDER by and sort_buffer_size was set to a small enough number.
It happened because the small sort buffer did not allow to allocate
all merge buffers in it.
Made sure that the allocated sort buffer would be big enough
to contain all possible merge buffers.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
TABLE_LIST::check_single_table made aware about fact that now if table attached to a merged view it can be (unopened) temporary table
(in 5.2 it was always leaf table or non (in case of several tables)).
|
