| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Filesort_buffer::alloc_sort_buffer(uint, uint)
Updating result for the group_by_innodb.test
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Filesort_buffer::alloc_sort_buffer(uint, uint)
When JOIN::destroy() is called for a JOIN object that has
- join->tmp_join != NULL
- also has join->table[0]->sort
then the latter was not cleaned up.
This could cause a memory leak and/or asserts in the subsequent queries.
Fixed by adding a cleanup call.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Merged revision 5224 from mysql-5.6 and added a test case.
..
revno: 5224
committer: Sergey Glukhov <sergey.glukhov@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.6
timestamp: Wed 2013-06-19 14:24:08 +0400
message:
Bug#16620047 INCORRECT QUERY RESULT (AFTER SERVER UPGRADE)
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
results (InnoDB/XtraDB)
This only happend when using an ORDER BY on a primary key part, where all other key parts where constant.
Remove of duplicated expressions in ORDER BY (as the old code did this in some strange cases)
mysql-test/r/group_by.result:
Fixed results to take into account that duplicate order by parts are now deleted
mysql-test/r/group_by_innodb.result:
Ensure extended keys are on
mysql-test/r/innodb_ext_key.result:
More tests
mysql-test/r/order_by.result:
More tests
mysql-test/t/group_by.test:
Fixed results to take into account that duplicate order by parts are now deleted
mysql-test/t/group_by_innodb.test:
Ensure extended keys are on
mysql-test/t/innodb_ext_key.test:
More tests
mysql-test/t/order_by.test:
More tests
sql/sql_select.cc:
Fixed bug where we looked at extended key parts when we shouldn't
Remove of duplicated expressions in ORDER BY
sql/table.cc:
Indentation fixes
|
|
|
Analysis:
The crash is a result of incorrect analysis of whether a secondary key
can be extended with a primary in order to compute ORDER BY. The analysis
is done in test_if_order_by_key(). This function doesn't take into account
that the primary key may in fact index the same columns as the secondary
key. For the test query test_if_order_by_key says that there is an extended
key with total 2 keyparts.
At the same time, the condition
if (pkinfo->key_part[i].field->key_start.is_set(nr))
in test_if_cheaper_oredring() becomes true for (i == 0), which results in
an invalid access to rec_per_key[-1].
Solution:
The best solution would be to reuse KEY::ext_key_parts that is already computed
by open_binary_frm(), however after detailed analysis the conclusion is that
the change would be too intrusive for a GA release.
The solution for 5.5 is to add a guard for the case when the 0-th key part is
considered, and to assume that all keys will be scanned in this case.
|
