| Commit message (Expand) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| * | Updated votes on time types | brianp | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -2/+5 |
| * | Refine my suggested names for both alternatives. | wrowe | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -3/+4 |
| * | I've since been swayed more toward the middle of this debate. I'm of | jwoolley | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -4/+2 |
| * | Add my votes. | dreid | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -4/+4 |
| * | Updated votes on apr_time_t renaming | brianp | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -3/+4 |
| * | whee, better than a vote | fielding | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -8/+12 |
| * | Reformat all votes of the same number with no explanations on the same line | jerenkrantz | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -5/+2 |
| * | Revisit my position, and comments on-point. Off-topic comments to list. | wrowe | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -6/+10 |
| * | add my 2c's | ianh | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -3/+5 |
| * | updated my votes on apr_table_t, added some explanatory notes | brianp | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -2/+13 |
| * | Revert the other significant response to trolling, it didn't belong in | wrowe | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -8/+2 |
| * | more junk | fielding | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -1/+25 |
| * | IMHO, apr_time_t should be treated as an opaque value. The library should be | jerenkrantz | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| * | Grmbl, grmbl, 8 spaces -> tab... squash it. | striker | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| * | Yet another vote... | striker | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -1/+2 |
| * | Fix my misconception, and retract an otherwise combative answer to | wrowe | 2002-07-12 | 1 | -6/+3 |
| * | Split opinion, commentary and aspecific complaints from the statements | wrowe | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -22/+46 |
| * | Comments on the time_t discussion | brianp | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -1/+7 |
| * | wake up | fielding | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -3/+35 |
| * | This seems to be a fairly moot issue at this point. | jwoolley | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -50/+1 |
| * | MHO | jwoolley | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -1/+7 |
| * | noone liked apr_butime_t so eliminate that part of the debate. | wrowe | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -10/+3 |
| * | Drop in my votes on this issue. | striker | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| * | These two questions aren't orthogonal, so the votes don't all make sense. | aaron | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -2/+4 |
| * | Votes passing in the night | jerenkrantz | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| * | Added vote on apr_time_t naming | brianp | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -1/+8 |
| * | FirstBill says longlong integer divisions are near gone. Change the | wrowe | 2002-07-11 | 1 | -13/+13 |
| * | Add my vote | thommay | 2002-06-28 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| * | Casting... | jim | 2002-06-28 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| * | My votes | rbb | 2002-06-28 | 1 | -4/+4 |
| * | *** empty log message *** | brane | 2002-06-28 | 1 | -4/+4 |
| * | mho | jwoolley | 2002-06-28 | 1 | -4/+7 |
| * | Added a call for votes on how to address the apr_time_t 64-bit division | brianp | 2002-06-28 | 1 | -1/+11 |
| * | "I can see down your shirt!" | gstein | 2002-05-31 | 1 | -1/+8 |
| * | Both of these issues have been taken care of. The old locks are gone | aaron | 2002-05-24 | 1 | -8/+1 |
| * | I *think* "polymorphically" is a word... | brianp | 2002-05-07 | 1 | -1/+6 |
| * | Convert apr_pcalloc to a macro to take advantage of compiler | brianp | 2002-05-05 | 1 | -7/+1 |
| * | Don't throw the baby out with the bath water... | stoddard | 2002-05-03 | 1 | -4/+5 |
| * | add my vote about atomics. | gregames | 2002-05-02 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| * | Small reformatting to make the votes easier to see (hopefully). Also | rbb | 2002-05-02 | 1 | -4/+5 |
| * | Missed the most important point of | jim | 2002-05-02 | 1 | -2/+3 |
| * | Cast me vote on atomics... back from | jim | 2002-05-02 | 1 | -1/+8 |
| * | nice & sunny and able to spend time playing outside ! | ianh | 2002-05-01 | 1 | -2/+12 |
| * | temperature's a'risin | jwoolley | 2002-05-01 | 1 | -2/+3 |
| * | My vote on apr_pcalloc. | striker | 2002-05-01 | 1 | -2/+6 |
| * | Well, yeah. | jerenkrantz | 2002-05-01 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| * | Added a call for votes on turning apr_pcalloc into a macro, | brianp | 2002-05-01 | 1 | -2/+17 |
| * | My thoughts on the atomics. I'm on the fence. But, I don't buy the binary | jerenkrantz | 2002-05-01 | 1 | -1/+6 |
| * | I hate calling votes like this, but I think we need a consensus. | aaron | 2002-04-26 | 1 | -1/+14 |
| * | Change wrongly assumed vote. Presented in a different context | striker | 2002-04-13 | 1 | -2/+4 |
